 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by East Street Trader
Paiktis, you are plainly partisan on this. Do you believe the serbs all to be saints and the ethnic Albanians all to be monsters? |
Far far from that. There have been horryfying attrocities commited by the Serbs. I'm however always ready to point out other parameters of the conflict which are also proven. There's a lot of guilt to go around to everyone and everyone should admit his own part in it and be judged for it. Lest we create only "demon serbs", innocent victims and benevolent international community carricatures.
Reality always makes better paths to solutions and explains the present and the past.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
The only substantial difference I can see between Yugoslavia and Sudan (a place with a higher body count) is that the victims were white. I'm sorry but I don't see that as sufficent reason for getting involved in an internal conflict. |
Maybe for Americans, but for the EU having a civil war ridden country right on your doorstep is not ideal. Considering the US won't let us make our own defense force as it would devalue NATO, the US will automatically be involved if the EU are, as any EU action will run through NATO.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Coming back to the present for a bit, I think this battle actually concerns the future status of Kosovo. Will it be an autonomous province? Will it remain and be returned to Serbia? The absence of a concrete future plan for Kosovo sends the message that it's up for grabs so to speak and everyone will jump on the occasion.
Granted that this absence of future plan for it was done deliberately but maybe it is now producing more problems that it originally was thought to prevent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
If the French have the ability to deal with a civil war in Africa without bothering us, there is more than enough military might sitting in European countries to meddle in the internal affairs of countries residing on thier continent without involving us. |
You wanted to be involved and bomb Serbia that's why US and UK forces were training UCK in terrorist tactics long before there was the erruption of violence in Kosovo.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I thought you said you were not going to respond to me. So get on with it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
After your edit consider my last post non existant.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BeBro
|
 |
of the Krauts
Mar 2000 time: 06:34
|
|
DD:
It does not matter if we see now valid reasons when the public opinion at this time, when confronted with the news about the conflict, demanded a solution. Clinton was free to do something, or to do nothing, but doing nothing wouldn't have been without consequences for him. The thing with the superpower status is that people expect all kind of help, and you can only refuse to act if you can sell that to your public. With a civil war of that dimension within Europe, with actions quickly compared in the press to those of the Nazis, I doubt any President would have looked good when doing nothing....
And of course people have another view of things extensively covered in the media, and the entire conflict on the Balkan was indeed covered much more like other conflicts, say in Africa. it may be sad, but it is also a fact, and if we like that or not - it influences people, and it influences politics.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
As the clash was intensifying Clinton had the perfect opportunity to try and prove NATO was still relevant after the collapse of USSR. This was a golden opportunity which he couldn't pass by. It's amusing that Americans seem to believe they were dragged in on this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
It's not a lie Oerdin. Would you want the sources again?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
And I'm not saying or blaming everything that happened in the US/UK or Europe, that would be absurd. They did have... considerable aid unfortunately by certain... local people eager to crack down revolts as they saw fit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Nor am I leaving out the Greek government's part in supporting the Milosevic regime for trade benefits and feeding crap to the Greek people about what the situation was.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I also agree that some sort of economy must get going in these parts. I think unemployment in Kosovo is extremely high but I may be wrong. Slovenia is free from ethnic tensions and it has flourished. But unfortunately it is "free" because it doesn't have minorities IIRC. If only in the Balkans the concept of homogenity being strength was somehow eradicated it would do wonders to the co-existance of people, who are in fact not that different and need to be less proud.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Why in the world should WE, meaning the UN, decide this issue? As in East Timor, the answer to the question of status should be put to a vote of the poeple concerned, the people of Kosovo.
It seems inevitable that Kosovo will be independent of Serbia. Whether it joins Albania is the real issue.
Why, Why, Why is the UN delaying a vote on this? Why? |
Ideally, I think there should be an agreement between the Albanians and Belgrade about the future status of Kosovo. And then this agreement vigourosly enforced by the whole international community. When can such an agreement come is another question though. I fear not soon.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|