 |
| |
|
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:35
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Agathon
CTV is a joke when it comes to these things and the CBC gave her a hard time, saying that Clarke was basically right. OF course the CBC is about the best you get in North America, but why not just stick to the joke media as usual...
Gotta say it's funny to watch people defending her. But then I suppose people defended Nixon just as vehemently. The funny thing is that Nixon was a powder puff compared to these crooks. |
Actually, the joke here is a Kiwi telling us all how things work over here. That is freeking priceless.
from the Toronto Star:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...ol=968793972154
quote:
Rice, the president's most loyal ally and trusted confidante, has a reputation as intelligent, unflappable and somewhat imperious. She admitted no mistakes and made no apologies today in a hearing considered critical to Bush's electoral fortunes.
The president refused for weeks to allow her to testify. He changed course after explosive allegations two weeks ago from former anti-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, who said top officials "ignored" warnings about the urgent threat of the Al Qaeda terrorist network until it was too late.
Clarke has also accused Bush, who's seeking re-election this fall as a wartime president, of being so dangerously focused on Iraq he's leaving the country exposed to another terrorist attack.
In turn, the White House has painted Clarke, whose new book is a runaway bestseller, as a bitter opportunist who was out of the decision-making loop before he resigned last year after serving four presidents.
But Rice was careful to praise his abilities, while parrying his criticisms.
Bush understood the importance of the Al Qaeda threat before Sept. 11, she said, and wanted to eliminate the network instead of reacting to each attack as it occurred like previous administrations had done.
"He told me he was tired of swatting at flies," said Rice, who unlike Clarke did not offer an apology to victims' families but thanked them for their help to the commission and shook hands with some of them when the hearing ended.
While Al Qaeda was "on the radar screen," said Rice, so were a lot of other issues, like the Middle East, North Korea and the Balkans.
"One doesn't have the luxury of dealing with only one issue."
Rice credited Bush after Sept. 11 with engaging in a broad "bolder course" against terrorism that included the Iraq invasion but she generally tried to stay away from the sensitive topic.
"The president recognizes our work is far from complete," said Rice, who worked for the previous Bush administration under the current president's father and has attracted a lot of notice as the only black woman in his inner circle.
"We're safer but we're not safe ... This is really the generational challenge," she told commission members, who often made their partisanship clear by the tone of their questions and their tussles with Rice. |
Can you show me pilloried in that?
I didn't think so.
Now, why don't you stop trying to speak as a Canadian, cause you don't seem like one to me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Condie goes in front of commission, farlefts say "ooh look at this! Bush is satan!", farrights say "bah, you are El Stupido because bush is da man. you just dont like him because u r jelous", then, everyone who has half a brain left says "I am mrmitchell or someone who agrees with him."
Why is it so easy to apply this to any political action at all?
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002
time: 00:35
|
|
quote:
Losing touch with reality
Leader
Friday April 9, 2004
The Guardian
Shortly before being elected US president, George Bush wasn't able to name the president of Pakistan when asked in a televised interview. Yet, according to his national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, in the months leading up to September 11, President Bush was fully briefed and supported a detailed plan to help General Musharraf cut off support to al-Qaida in Afghanistan. As Groucho Marx once asked: "Who do you believe - me, or the evidence of your own eyes?"
Dr Rice was in a very difficult position in her testimony yesterday to the September 11 commission investigating the attacks. She had to steer very carefully, between accusations of the administration having done nothing to counter al-Qaida, and its having been able to have stopped the hijackers on September 11. The fact that Dr Rice was testifying at all, after weeks of resistance to a public appearance before the commission, was a recognition by the White House of the danger it faces, with an election looming, a resurgent Democrat party and several telling charges from within the administration itself, such as former terrorism advisor Richard Clarke.
Predictably, Dr Rice's first objective was to protect the president from criticism. But she failed to satisfy those watching her testimony that the received image of the pre-9/11 White House - that it barely feigned interest in foreign affairs - was inaccurate. Her exchange with commission member Richard Ben-Veniste was particularly revealing, over if she had told President Bush there were al-Qaida cells in the US, after that information had been passed to her by Mr Clarke. To say - as Dr Rice did - "I really don't remember whether I discussed this with the president," should be called the Reagan defence, after the former president repeatedly used the phrase "I don't recall" in an inquiry into the Iran-Contra scandal. What is questionable is whether that is a credible defence from someone reputed to be the smartest person in the White House.
The idea that President Bush was fully briefed about al-Qaida, and that the White House understood that it "posed a serious threat to the United States", simply does not ring true. That feeling is supported by the fact that both the administration and Dr Rice were more interested in pushing for a pointless missile defence shield in the months before September 11. To say that a memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States" did not warn of an impending attack, according to Dr Rice, suggests the administration has begun to lose touch with reality. |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september...1188852,00.html
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Mad Monk
|
 |
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000
time: 23:35
|
|
quote:
April 9, 2004
TV WATCH
Testimony Provides Breath of Racial Reality for TV
By ALESSANDRA STANLEY
here was absolutely nothing in Condoleezza Rice's neutral-toned suit, primly folded hands or calm demeanor to draw attention to her sex or race. Her answers, guarded, prosaic and a bit pedantic, were typical of any high-level Washington official.
But the last time the major networks interrupted regular programming to provide live coverage of a black woman testifying under oath in Washington was years ago when Anita Hill spoke out against Clarence Thomas in 1991.
And at least one former senator intent on confronting Ms. Rice seemed sensitive to her background.
"Let me say at the beginning I'm very impressed, indeed, I'd go so far as to say moved by your story, the story of your life and what you've accomplished," Bob Kerrey, a commission member and former Democratic senator from Nebraska, told Ms. Rice, referring to her early childhood in segregated Birmingham, Ala. "It's quite extraordinary."
Actually, Ms. Rice has said in interviews that there is nothing unusual about her success given her upbringing by parents and grandparents who were college educated and who prodded her to excel.
It was Mr. Kerrey who brought a touch of the extraordinary to a mostly tepid, inconclusive televised hearing. His wild-card questioning and difficulty remembering Ms. Rice's name gave the starchy national security adviser a chance to show, live on every network and cable news show, a flash of personality so often missing from her public persona. "I don't think I look like Dick Clarke," she said with a patient smile after Mr. Kerrey repeatedly called her "Dr. Clarke." Richard A. Clarke, the former counterterrorism chief, testified before the panel last month.
CNN and other news outlets had hyped her appearance as a kind of showdown, but as it turned out, Ms. Rice's much-anticipated moment in the spotlight did not shed new light on the administration's handling of terrorist threats before Sept. 11. If anything, her measured performance brought a breath of reality to a television universe too often clotted with distorted images of black women, most notably the angry Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth making her vengeful comeback on the NBC show "The Apprentice."
The fact that Ms. Rice is a black woman is rarely mentioned in Washington — she is so much a part of the establishment and blends so smoothly into the buttoned-down Bush White House that her heritage is usually invisible.
As the administration's national security policy has come under fierce scrutiny, however, it has been raised along the margins.
The liberal political satirist Garry Trudeau had Mr. Bush calling her "Brown Sugar," in a Doonesbury cartoon strip this week. On "Crossfire" last month, the conservative columnist Robert Novak asked whether Mr. Clarke might have had "a problem with this African-American woman, Condoleezza Rice."
And after her testimony, Lee H. Hamilton, a commissioner and a former Democratic House member from Indiana, told reporters that he found Ms. Rice "articulate," an adjective that even she has dismissed as condescending.
Mostly, Ms. Rice spoke as fast as she could to throw a protective cordon around the president. In an administration in which the president is rarely described as "articulate" and the taciturn vice president spends much time in undisclosed locations, Ms. Rice is one of the most familiar faces on television.
Yet even the camera-savvy Ms. Rice looked a little nervous while reading her opening statement, a text that steered clear of any apology or admission of error. She smiled a little too often, perhaps to avoid looking angry or defensive, but her geniality was at times jarring in the context of Sept. 11. She also looked small and unprotected, seated alone at a conference table with roaming photographers shooting at her back.
And Ms. Rice looked most uncomfortable when Richard Ben-Veniste, a Washington lawyer and commissioner, asked her the title of the Aug. 6 document that she said carried no warning about an imminent terrorist attack in the United States. "I believe the title was 'Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States,' " she replied stonily.
She got her groove back after a bracing exchange with Mr. Kerrey.
Mr. Kerrey scored a sound bite by challenging a Bush comment about "swatting flies," but his reference to the bombing of the destroyer Cole in 2000 gave Ms. Rice a chance to swat back. "I'm aware, Mr. Kerrey, of a speech that you gave at that time that said that perhaps the best thing that we could do to respond to the Cole and to the memories was to do something about the threat of Saddam Hussein. That's a strategic view," she said slyly as some in the room applauded and laughed. "And we took the strategic view."
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/09/p...print&position=
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35.
Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-04-2004 08:27
.
|