 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Can you demonstrate to me that we live in an objective reality? Can you show me that we aren't simply a construct of someone? Or that we are force fed to believe a line of reality? Can you prove to me any of it? Decartes' "I think therefore I am" is nice, but doesn't answer it. |
Which is why "correct" cannot be used in the fairy world of social sciences, but only in rigidly defined constructs like mathematics.
quote: In that case, if there is no proof of objective reality, how can anything be objective within it? It's simply subjective based on what you percieve and what you think you know. |
Yep. 
quote: Likewise, flaws or errors are determined by our perception of things. A prime example of a variability of 'correct' is a traffic accident. An officer can talk to 15 different people and they'll say 15 different things. How do you come up with a 'correct' answer of what happened? |
You can't ever come up with a "correct" answer of what happened, only the most plausible which can be dealt with as being the consensus, and therefore the acceptable answer, or if you prefer, effectively correct.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Which is, as you said, a construct. And thus, since there is no objective reality, it must be a subjective terminology which is fenced in by the defined construct. That doesn't make it any less subjective in the whole scheme of things. Even if you look at the world mathamatics, there is still an entire world just outside of it... it doesn't exist in a vacuum. |
For all intents and purposes, mathematics does exists in a vacuum. It was developed to help us understand our world, but it is not dependant on it. It has its own rules, and as long as it stays in the sandbox of mathematics, it is isolated from the subjective real world.
That's not guaranteeing there's always a perfect mapping from mathematics to the real world, because the real world IS subjective. But inside the isolated world of mathematics, we can deal with objectiveness: 1+1=2 is objectively true for real numbers, and this is determined using mathematics entirely.
It is not objectively true to say 1 person +1 person = 2 persons, because that then maps to the outside world, which is subjective.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|