 |
|  |
 |
|
GhengisFarb
|
 |
I want my HAMBURGERS!!
May 2002 time: 23:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Oh, yes, 500,000 soldeirs.....cause we know a number equivalent to almost the Entire US army votes solely in Florida....RIGHT.
Whe making absurd claims, at least try to keep your numbers within the realm of reason. |
Hello, Mr. Illiteracy, I said 50,000 to 500,000 cause I honestly didn't remember where the digit was. And I was too lazy to look it up. But then you were too lazy to read my post so I guess we're even. 
Still they "banned" far more legitimately cast votes than the Republicans are being accused of doing. 
EDIT: after googling a bit there were 15,000 from one county alone that the State FORCED the county to count later. From what I remember of the CNN reports and other networks at the time the Democratic Party had agreed to let them be "counted" but they would not be added into the totals used to determine the actual outcomes of the elections.
So they would be counted but would not be allowed to affect the tallies? It was pretty weird, it was a major network news story for a few weeks after the election.
Last edited by GhengisFarb on 25-05-2004 at 04:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Didn't Florida state law require a statewide recount anyway? Didn't the SC support that "in principle", i.e. if it could be done in the 2 hours left for recounting?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SpencerH
Yes, lets continue to wallow around in unending regurgitation of the trivial details of hanging chads, absentee ballots, unsubstantiated claims made by minorities, and MrFunisms while the question of who should be allowed to vote remains unanswered. |
Thank you for bringing this back on track, though where you went from there was a little odd.
This is about Florida basically saying, "proove you have a right to vote." What happened to asumption of innosence? What happened to due process?
In other news, a Federal court through out a lawsuit that would have required touch screen systems to produce a paper trail. The judge said that while a similar suit is pending in Florida courts, he hasn't jurisdiction. I don't see why not. The right to vote is a Constitutional matter. If SCOTUS can ursurp a case while its in state court, why can't a lower Federal court?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|