 |
|  |
 |
|
bipolarbear
|
 |
of Persia and the Communist Party of Apolyton
Feb 2004 time: 22:36
|
|
So should abortion be legal? Is it morally justifiable?
We have been "talking"(being pummelled with the Catholic view) about this in my "Moral Theology"(Catholic Brainwashing via "unbiased" propaganda) class. It got me thinking. I'm pro-choice personally (Anti-Life as the Catholic Mafia of my school would brand me).
I've been seeking an informed and mostly unbiased conversation, or at the very least information on the subject, but my friends aren'tthe most informed, and my school has already proven itslef ot be a failure, my mom watches Fox News and that's enough said there, nad the internet hasn't really been that great either, up til now.
So, in my moment of confusion, I turn to you the masses of Apolyton, to discuss, flame, post, and hopefully not destroy my chase for information with karmic spam.
With that said, let the posting begin! Orn ot in which case this, like most of my threads will sink like something thta has a much higher density than water.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bipolarbear
|
 |
of Persia and the Communist Party of Apolyton
Feb 2004 time: 22:36
|
|
quote: Why? Just 'cause you like rebelling? |
Please do not degrade my opinion, no matter how worthless it may seem all the time, to that of pure rebeliion, it is not. I constructed that post poorly anways, that wasn't what I mena t at all.
I have struggled with the issue of abortion for a while before my class, and I came to the conclusion, that a fetus isn't really human life til it is born. While it may display may qualities of a human, it is not true human life.
I personally only support abortion to the second trimester. Partial birth abortions are bull***. If you waited that long to have a baby, then just have it and put it up for adoption.
I am pro abortion, more b/c I don't like back alley with a hanger abortions, and I think that a woman has a right to her reproductive rights. Basically that a woman has the right to abort a fetus should she so choose to.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:36
|
|
bipolarbear:
No prob. Just trying to sift things out.
quote:
While it may display may qualities of a human, it is not true human life.
|
That's an interesting perspective. What qualifies something as true human life?
If the unborn child is not human life, than what is it?
quote:
I personally only support abortion to the second trimester. Partial birth abortions are bull***. If you waited that long to have a baby, then just have it and put it up for adoption.
|
Okay. So at what point does the unborn child become, as you put it, true human life?
quote:
I am pro abortion, more b/c I don't like back alley with a hanger abortions, and I think that a woman has a right to her reproductive rights.
|
We've had people up here in Canada argue that abortions could be done safely without a physician. Even if abortion were made illegal, they would be done safely with the equipment available today.
Even Mary Calderone said this back in the fifties, that abortions, even illegal ones were safely done by qualified physicians.
So there is no basis in history, nor in the present day for back-alley butchers.
Secondly, you have the dubious claim, that just because people hurt themselves trying to kill someone else, means we ought to make it safer for them to do so. Back-alleys are a side-issue that deflects things from the central issue, what is the unborn?
quote:
Basically that a woman has the right to abort a fetus should she so choose to.
|
Why does she have this right? Has she always had this right?
Unborn children have not changed. If women were to gain this right, you are now arguing that something fundamental has changed in the status of the unborn child.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bipolarbear
|
 |
of Persia and the Communist Party of Apolyton
Feb 2004 time: 22:36
|
|
quote: Okay. So at what point does the unborn child become, as you put it, true human life? |
Basically around the third trimester, I think abortions shouldn't be allowed as to when life begins, that is a very tricky question, that I have yet to come up with an answer for, yet I still have an opinion.
I used ot go by sentiency, but then that would mena that a majority of the human race, especially those who live in the malls of Amerca, would be ripe for the kill.
I think once hte baby is out of the mother, its rights begin, but until then, it is still in development.
quote: Why does she have this right? Has she always had this right?
Unborn children have not changed. If women were to gain this right, you are now arguing that something fundamental has changed in the status of the unborn child. |
In my mind, they have always had this right, so women aren't gaining a right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:36
|
|
quote:
that I have yet to come up with an answer for, yet I still have an opinion.
|
The best answer, from a scientific, and philosophical standpoint is conception.
At conception, a new individual forms from the sperm and egg of the mother. Your genetic code forms here, making you distinct from your parents.
Life then, can be seen as a continuum from conception onwards. Sure we grow and develop inside the womb, but we continue to develop outside the womb.
Are you not more capable than you were when you were younger? Yet are you not the same person you were earlier? Therefore, what counts is not your current capacities, but rather your innate capacity to grow and develop. This forms at conception.
quote:
I think once hte baby is out of the mother, its rights begin, but until then, it is still in development.
|
But then you are left supporting partial birth abortion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|