 |
|  |
 |
|
Victor Galis
|
 |
in exile
Jul 1999 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by General Ludd
I think that the semantics game is tiring and really just side-steps the issues completely. People can spend all their time arguing about what's human without adressing the actual issues of abortion at all. |
Um... no, if the fetus is just a bag of cells within the mother, then what place does the government have telling her what to do with it? If it's a person, then yes, it would be murder.
quote: If the unborn child is not human life, than what is it? |
Something that is human and can survive on its own (or in the case of some terminally ill patients/accident victims, etc., someone who once could survive on his own.)
quote: So there is no basis in history, nor in the present day for back-alley butchers. |
Ah, you are fortunate enough not to know the megalomania of Ceausescu. He wanted to rule over more people so he banned abortion and contraception. Needless to say, some still tried to get abortions.
quote: Regardless of wether or not you want to think of an unborn child as a human or a lump of flesh, I do not think any sane person can think of abortion as a desirable or 'un-noteworthy' procedure. It's nasty buisness, and is usually a very traumatic event . The semantics argument is mostly just created to ignore this fact. |
The semantics issue basically is the basis for whether or not the government has an obligation to stop the proceedure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|