 |
|  |
 |
|
Hercules
|
 |
in Tir Na Og
Sep 2002 time: 05:37
|
|
Well using Maki's end 2119 turn, I called up Mr Yang for a chat. I asked him if he had any other faction comms, and he asked which one I was interested in. I asked for the Gaians. but he didn't have it. Then he had to dash as he hadn't got all day to talk: busy tyrant that he is.
So here's the question.
Is it allowed that my team mates also call up Mr Yang and ask the same question but for a different faction each time.
This way we will learn if Mr Yang has met any other factions (other AI perhaps?).
However if this was not a team MP game, we would only get to ask the question once each turn, before the abrupt sign off. It would take me 5 turns to discover if he has met the Peacekeepers (or whoever) or not. OTOH we are not playing any moves ahead. I chose the Gaians but it could've been any faction and I got lucky.
Lastly we would still need ecs to buy the comm if we wanted it. So at this point it is still just an intelligence gathering exercise.
Note Maki hadn't contacted Yang (unless she did after posting the end turn, but she didn't mention it): I don't believe we discussed it as a play possibility: probably because we thought he might ask for another tech or something vile.
Last edited by Hercules on 27-07-2004 at 02:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mart7x5
|
|
Doc:Flex is very tempting.
The same question from the other side:
Can releasing our current map harm our faction very much? Sooner or later others will get the map. Having Doc:Flex early will speed up contact with others - technology trading is a good thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mart7x5
|
|
I would say - Friendly. We need friends now for faster rise to power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mart7x5
|
|
How about the last paragraf this way:
quote: We politely request that you withdraw your units from our territory and refrain from opening any starship "Unity" pods within our borders. Due to our current relations, presence of your units in our territory causes difficulties in using our communication trails. Opening starship "Unity" pods endangers our bases and non-military units in the field by exposing them to native planet life attacks. In return we offer to respect Gaian territorial borders in the same way. |
Maybe let's resign from indicating missing pod. They did it when not aware of our borders.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mart7x5
|
|
Trade Doc:Mobility and Doc:Flex
for Ind Auto and hive commlink
I think it's worth it. Any other bets?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mart7x5
|
|
After some thoughts, why not just to write:
quote: We politely request that you withdraw your units from our territory and refrain from opening any starship "Unity" pods within our borders. Due to our current relations, presence of your units in our territory causes difficulties in using our communication trails. Opening starship "Unity" pods endangers our bases and non-military units in the field by exposing them to native planet life attacks. We have already noticed missing pod within our borders. In return we offer to respect Gaian territorial borders in the same way. |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|