 |
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:35
|
|
But PA has a point. Howard is trying to appeal to the mainstream, and so hardline voters might turn to the BNP. It's like Nader and the Dems. I don't think the BNP is the entirely racist organisation that it is somtimes portrayed as, however, as PA says: quote: we probably have enough racists in this country to make a lot of BNP members racists. | Most parties follow their membership, and as such, since a good proportion of the BNP is racist, it's policies will be somewhat racist. The fact so many of them are like that is why I'd never vote for them, even if I agreed with their stance on immigration.
People who don't want to support racism, but do want to end immigration, have nowhere to go, it seems. People who would agree with David Davis, The Sun or The Mail, who usually vote Tory, but who may defect if the Tories try to capture the centre.
The Tories are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If they appeal to these people, while they are numerous, they lose the centre ground, which means Labour win the election. If they go for the centre, they'll lose some support to the BNP and UKIP, and won't get enough of the centre to beat Labour. Unless the Liberals take a lot of out Labour's left, while Howard manages to keep possible BNP voters and capture the centre at once (a big push for public service choice while also pushing for anti-immigration might do it), the Tories will lose the next general election. It's a tall order, but with Iraq going badly, public services being fought over choice, and the Euro-sceptic feeling very much apparent, it's doable.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|