 |
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: What is not needed is a monolithic, highly centralized power to tell you when to stand, when to sit, what to think, and when to $hit. |
And how many communists on this board actually argue for that?
In fact what you've described sounds like a lot of schools and many places of employment.
quote: How would you implement it? How would you deal with dissenters and folks who really didn't appreciate the sublime logic of strongarming all their posessions "for the good of the state" (which of course, magically translates to "for their own good"). |
The same way capitalism deals with dissenters, by ignoring them. There's a reason that radical anarchists, libertarians and communists can't get much traction in contemporary politics: most people are reasonably satisfied with welfare state capitalism and the very structure of the system makes it hard to dissent effectively (radical anarchists and poor people tend not to own media empires, and even if they did other interests would make sure they failed).
And we already get strongarmed by the state every day - for our own good.
Jesus, most left wing people I know are not calling for an immediate communist revolution (maybe Che is, but I'm not). Rather they are calling for specific reforms within the welfare state capitalist system to deal with specific problems like pollution and unemployment.
Arguments about the validity of a communist utopia are interesting theoretical arguments, but they have little practical applicability at this very moment in time. Like almost everything in human affairs, we will cross that bridge when we come to it.
quote: How would you implement it? |
That's a nonsensical question. Who implemented capitalism? Nobody - it implemented itself. It just happened as a response to social and technological developments.
If you want to ignore the most fundamental aspect of Marxism (its radical historicity) then go ahead. Unless you argue against that, you aren't addressing the point.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:33
|
|
I think he's saying that he wishes "someone" would, but he's not gonna be the one to do it, and since he's not gonna be that person, he doesn't have to have a rational plan for implementation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monolith94
|
 |
New England
Jan 1970 time: 00:33
|
|
Living in a highly centralized, socialized society has nothing to do with not having to think, etc. Indeed, a truly socialist society FREES a person, allowing them to pursue the profession, to pursue whatever allows them to do the most good in the world, by removing the shackles of fiscal burden.
Although it can be argued that fiscal burden has a positive effect on an artist's output, but that's a rather cynical viewpoint.
And the Russians didn't raise slackers and lazy workers. In actuality, I've found from my reading in last semester's Revolutionary Russia class that the average worker worked really hard. What they crushed was political ambition, political independence. A nation of political sycophants. But lazy? No.
Velocyrix - all of this stuff about crushing thoughts outside the party line... That's Stalinist, even Leninist communism. Admittedly, the sort of Communism that doesn't work - at all. What offers a better solution is an intellectually liberated socialist state.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|