 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: I don't really support either of those things DF. That's capitalism. |
Oh, you don't support welfare? Can I also assume that you oppose all other "wealth-transfer" programs?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
Monolith, I like that answer. It has the ring of truth and honesty to it.
It's genuine. 
You're essentially fessing up to the fact that you don't know, and that's a good thing.
That is, I believe, what's at the core of the problem with the vast majority of the folks arguing for Communism on this, and other boards I fight the good fight for Capitalism on.
Yeah yeah, the red desciples have read the book and god but it all sounds so groovy and they get all excited thinking about the day when utopia arrives.....
....but they don't stop to consider exactly what that means, I don't think (and it certainly doesn't seem so). The specific steps required to get to that point.
They talk a good game about a radically altered system of deciding on how goods and services are doled out, without thinking about the infrastructure required to support it (ie - Che's comment that he "wasn't arguing for" a highly centralized apparatus....that's pretty much what a central planning agency IS, and it does require defense, but...anyway...that's veeringn off-topic).
Anyhoo....I appreciate your candor...
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monolith94
Living in a highly centralized, socialized society has nothing to do with not having to think, etc. Indeed, a truly socialist society FREES a person, allowing them to pursue the profession, to pursue whatever allows them to do the most good in the world, by removing the shackles of fiscal burden.
Although it can be argued that fiscal burden has a positive effect on an artist's output, but that's a rather cynical viewpoint.
And the Russians didn't raise slackers and lazy workers. In actuality, I've found from my reading in last semester's Revolutionary Russia class that the average worker worked really hard. What they crushed was political ambition, political independence. A nation of political sycophants. But lazy? No. |
That's because in the Soviet Union people had to work for their pay (sort of). It was basically a giant, monopolistic company.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
quote: We mechanize society to the point where the entire blue-collar worker is superfluous. This will eventually happen. Not for quite a while, but I believe it will. |
And when they become self-aware, they become an underclass. In fact, I wrote a short story about it; they implented Orwellian thought control methods on the robots to keep them from revolting. Except, it used the euphemism "antivirus software", and the hunter-seeker algorithm came to mind.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|