 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
quote: for a day would come crawling back to Windows rather quickly.
|
That is your assumption.
quote: Lots of people try Linux, very few dual boot it, and a pathetically small amount of people have it as their only OS. That should tell people something. |
Assumption, again!
quote: and you still haven't answered my distro question. |
Sorry. It was?
quote: fat32 is the only thing that both windows and linux can access safely |
You can replace io.sys with an "upgraded" one that allows you to access reiserfs filesystems, IIRC. There are also a lot of applications allowing to use reiserfs from Windows. FAT32 is horrible....
quote: Now you're up to 5 year old Windows games |
So? It is a most glorious game. American Conquest from CDV, actually, also runs.
quote: ood God, I once made the mistake of trying to install Quake 3 for Linux. It never did work, after about 3 hours of f*cking around. |
What you tried to install it via rpm?
Quake 3 took 2 mins to uncompress, 3 mins to install. Yes. WineX games take a minimal amount of configuration. For optimality, you can link it against winelib.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
Not a lot of truth in it. Generally, most of my classmates which I have advocated it to, have no problems.
quote: Linux on the desktop makes progress when it emulates the most successful parts of Windows. Unfortunatley by the time it catches up, Windows has already moved ahead again. |
Wrong. It started behind, but it is catching up. The tortoise and the hare. Linux on the desktop is moving at a tad faster speed. It'll take some time to catch up yes, but there the disparity is closing. If you hadn't looked at Novell's and SuSE's new products...
quote: It illustrates how Linux itself is 5 years behind when it comes to the desktop. |
American Conquest came out last year.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
How do you know? They really have no problems. I come over often.
When not occupied with homework, obviously.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Natalinasmpf
Not a lot of truth in it. Generally, most of my classmates which I have advocated it to, have no problems. |
I work at a large company that's pumping up Linux like no tomorrow, and you wouldn't believe the stories I hear at lunch about people's Linux installs.
You wouldn't believe the service cases I've had to deal with for Linux installs. 99% of the time it's a weird dependency error, or incompatible version of an obscure library that they didn't even know was installed. Linux is hell...
quote: Wrong. It started behind, but it is catching up. The tortoise and the hare. Linux on the desktop is moving at a tad faster speed. It'll take some time to catch up yes, but there the disparity is closing. If you hadn't looked at Novell's and SuSE's new products... |
How is it moving faster? What kind of advancements has Linux's desktop environments made in the past, say, 3 years? Every new version of Gnome, people ***** about it more than they praise it. Many people hate the new Gtk filepicker because you can't even type in a frickin' filename.
Linux on the desktop now is comparable to somewhere between Win3.1/Win95 -- it's inconsistent, it's kludgey, it's under-responsive, and it's limited.
Linux is about 4 years from being on the level of quality, polish, and consistency of XP, and about 10 years from the technology of Longhorn.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Whoahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Any notable ones worth mentioning? |
They've all been public, just a lot of "no name" companies that do a lot for like business modelling software. Most of the companies were smaller ones with < 70 employees that IBM was one of the primary venture capitalists for, and then once they turned out a good product, IBM buys them up.
It was 17 since 2001, btw: http://news.com.com/IBM+buys+into+a..._3-5288470.html
quote: The purchase of Cyanea, which represents the 17th company that IBM's software group has bought since 2001, is consistent with IBM's plan to build out a broad set of tools for building, running and managing business applications, said John Swainson, IBM's vice president of worldwide software sales. Swainson recently took on the head software sales job after leading the WebSphere division.
"We are always making buy vs. build decisions about how we can extend our portfolio," said Swainson.
Swainson noted that application management--a market with several smaller, niche providers--is an area where IBM wants a full set of offerings that span older CICS and IMS mainframe-based transaction systems, along with WebSphere, which runs on Windows, Linux and Unix operating systems.
Earlier this year IBM acquired Candle, an 18-year-old company that also sells application management tools. Chong and the Cyanea team have been given the task of consolidating the Cyanea tools with those from Candle and the Tivoli monitoring tools, Swainson said. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
So Asher, when 2008 rolls around, you'd agree to install that Orwellian motherboard that on a hardware level restricts and redirects your information flow, in integration with Longhorn, possibly with wide range for both corporate and government abuse it in conjunction with the Patriot Act right?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natalinasmpf
|
|
Its not slashdot. Seems a rather reputable source to me.
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html
Large space for corporate abuse, locking out small programmers, protecting the large corporate base, restricting innovation from smaller companie, an Orwellian scheme....
Oh sure, it protects data, but only the current data they want to protect, Microsoft's, but smaller companies' software won't be allowed to run, later on, a huge capacity for that.
quote: easy for Microsoft and the music industry to control what players will work at all with new releases, it will be harder for you to escape. Control of media player software is so important that the EU antitrust authorities are proposing to penalise Microsoft for its anticompetitive behaviour by compelling it to unbundle Media Player, or include competing players in Windows. TC will greatly increase the depth and scope of media control. |
"We don't like this new competitor. Lets lock him out!"
They don't exactly say that, but mass room for abuse.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|