 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Apocalypse
|
 |
Lexington, VA: College - Houston, TX: Home
Aug 2005 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: Is there anything that isn't a video? |
Um... it's a freaking video game for God's sake. You can't judge one without a video or it running on the screen right in front of you. Screenshots don't do any game justice. |
Well then I'll only be able to go on what you say. At least until August 25th when I'm back at my normal college.
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: Meh. Those goals aren't even that big. Ooooo do something without getting hit. Again, they better have it so there is a chance of it not working since it's incredibly easy to never get hit in Morrowind, or even games like Jagged Alliance if you are good enough. |
You are such a hater because this is an X-Box RPG. If it was Fallout 3 which boasted this, you'd be jumping up and down and declaring it to be the be all and end all. Admit it. 
And I'd think doing a quest without getting a hit, doing a quest with no weapons, doing a quest with no armor are pretty big goals. |
I am not a hater. If this was Fallout 3 I'd be wondering why they were adding in this stuff and would be worrying Bethesda was going to **** it up. Just like I eventually was going with some of Fallout: Tactics gimmicks.
Without getting hit?
Again: Morrowind, JA
Without weapons?
Well, spells are pretty powerful
Armor?
Monks never use armor. And ranged attacks can make it quite easy. Heck, in BG1 you could kill Ankhegs at level one if you had an archer and just kept running away.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Apocalypse
|
 |
Lexington, VA: College - Houston, TX: Home
Aug 2005 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: If this was Fallout 3 I'd be wondering why they were adding in this stuff and would be worrying Bethesda was going to **** it up. |
Uh huh... and if it is was Troika, you'd be sucking their ****, like you have been doing (even though Arcanum wasn't that great of a game and you treat it like it was God's gift). |
I don't really see Troika doing this. And lets take another PC game. I was really interesting in Republic for a while until I decided a lot of it's **** was gimmicky and wouldn't be implimented well.
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: Without getting hit?
Again: Morrowind, JA
Without weapons?
Well, spells are pretty powerful
Armor?
Monks never use armor. And ranged attacks can make it quite easy. Heck, in BG1 you could kill Ankhegs at level one if you had an archer and just kept running away. |
You are really something. So because in some games you could do some quests without getting hit, or without weapons, or without armor, that means it should be easy to win boasts in Fable too? 
Of course all those games had the threat of losing gold for not finishing the boast either? Oh, but you'll find something utterly unrelated to attempt to lie your way into saying they did. |
I didn't say this was definitely going to happen with Fable, just that they better make it not a sure thing. And who really cares about losing gold? In what game was gold a serious problem and you didn't end up having more than you knew what to do with at the end of the game?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
quote: Again, what ideas in the game are really that new? I'll admit some of them might be the next step in some areas if they are implimented well, but what is truly new? |
you're just stonewalling, you're plugging your eyes and saying "****, ****, ****, its just ****, ****, ****".
Every game is just a new spin off of an old idea. The thing that really makes me excited about Fable is that if everything is how they say it is it will begin a whole new era for RPG's. The player will really start to be the avatar and not just the person controlling a cartoon character, it will be like a second life. It will be one step closer to the holo-decks on Star Trek. Thats every gamers wet dream is to have a holo-deck to play games in, is it not?
quote: And in that shot where one cuts the other's head off - how was that possible, given where the defender's sword is? |
you're missing the point. he cut the dudes head off. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Apocalypse
|
 |
Lexington, VA: College - Houston, TX: Home
Aug 2005 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Space05us
quote: Again, what ideas in the game are really that new? I'll admit some of them might be the next step in some areas if they are implimented well, but what is truly new? |
you're just stonewalling, you're plugging your eyes and saying "****, ****, ****, its just ****, ****, ****".
Every game is just a new spin off of an old idea. The thing that really makes me excited about Fable is that if everything is how they say it is it will begin a whole new era for RPG's. The player will really start to be the avatar and not just the person controlling a cartoon character, it will be like a second life. It will be one step closer to the holo-decks on Star Trek. Thats every gamers wet dream is to have a holo-deck to play games in, is it not? |
Well, some things are really innovative. Like some of the stuff in RoN. And the thing is, this game is running on "new" ideas that aren't new. Fallout and Arcanum ran on story and atmosphere. Dungeon Siege ran on combat. Diablo ran on a dress-up game. You know? They were good on what they advertised. If there was more to it than them saying they have new **** that isn't that new, then maybe it'd come off better. I'm not saying the avatar won't be fun, and I might buy this game, but I don't see why everyone is spluging everywhere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
Those graphics are good enough imho, they could be far far worse. They may be a bit cartoony as a sacrafice to increase framerate, a problem that Morrowind on X-box suffered from greatly was a bad frame rate. How would you guys want them to look anyway?
quote: Again with the gimmicks. That's all they care to talk about. But not a word about the story. Compared to the story, you'll have to admit that your character's appearance is pretty secondary. Makes me wonder.... I'm sure there's a story (I was joking earlier), but either they want to keep it secret, or they're not working that hard on it, or they worked mainly on the bells and whistles up until now. |
The story is; you are an orphaned teenager who takes on the quest for vengence, you will kill the mother ****ers who nailed your dog to the door. As you go through life you do heroic deeds and (Id assume) as you go along you find hints about who is responsible, and eventualy you find the megolomaniac-mad-would-be-destroyer of peoples pet dogs and put an end to him/her/it and save the world. The End. The most cliche RPG story of all time. Thats what I understand the main storyline to be, nothing great (as with all RPGs) but enough to hold your attention while you adventure through an amazing world with tons of kick-ass gimmicks and good [enough] graphics.
Im sure everyone who buys this game will start posting on Apolyton about thier life story, and who they are, how they married a princess and hold the title "kicker of a million chickens". How they killed all of the bandits on such and such road while on thier way battle king koopa and the mini bowsers... .... how they slept with 20 women in one night and raided an entire village afterward in celebration.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
quote: Ok, then what's the point? |
We'll all enjoy it, and share our adventures with our fellow 'Polytubbies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Felch
A fresh X-box is cheaper than a new graphics card. Consoles are far less expensive than PCs even if you buy a whole new one every two or three years.
|
economics of consoles vs PCs really gets into personal situations to a considerable degree. Ive seen lots of arguments for consoles that assumes that once you own a PC you will never buy a new one except for games, and assume that if you game on PC, you will play FPS and other graphics intensive games, and then proceed to compare the cycle PC purchase and Video card upgrade cycle to the console cycle.
An unscientific survey here suggests that plenty of new PC's are purchased because of A. A change in family structure - a young person moving out, a family deciding to have more PCs, etc B. PC ceases to have specs required for non-game software, or desire to have other new features C. Physical breakdown of old PC.
Really, how many NON-gamers still have 486 or earlier PCs, and no other? Sooner or later everyones gonna replace anyway. And if you DO game on PCs and mainly play genres that are NOT particularly graphics intensive, youre replacement/upgrade cycle will look very different, and you will save very little on hardware by switching all your gameplaying to Consoles, even if your choice of games allowed that. There are of course other considerations in both directions.
If, like myself you mainly play TBS, historical wargames, citybuilders, and only dabble with RPGs and other genres, theres really no good reason to get a console, that i can see. IF you are a serious RPG player, this new game Fable, MAY, together with other factors, sway you toward an Xbox, but that will depend on everyones individual situation.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|