 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
Sir Ralph, I believe the US should only support UNSC actions, or actions taken by permanent member on behalf of the UN, that advance democracy or human rights, or that in some clear fashion restores order.
If China were to invade Iraq on behalf of the UNSC, I would be concerned because I do not trust China to bring democracy to Iraq. I rather think they would impose communism.
However, if China were to act in the Korean situation where there already was a pre-existing communist government, I would have lesser concerns due to the fact that Korea already was communist.
Back to 1441, I think the US and Britain, who were the major complaining parties wrt 1441, had full rights to enforce it without a second resolution.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
optimus2861
|
|
Halifax, NS
Nov 2000 time: 01:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by OliverFA
Terorism attack Spain ---> Spanish vote a government that do everything terrorist demands without even asking anything in return. |
You missed the part in the middle where the Spanish government lied about who was responsible for the attack. Why is it that everyone who parrots out this "Spanish gave in to the terrorists!" line never takes this into account? Do you really think a government that so brazenly lies to its people over something as serious as a terrorist attack deserves to be reelected?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|