 |
| |
|
|
binTravkin
|
 |
Lord of Progress of the Council of Lords of Gaia
Jan 2004
time: 07:36
|
|
We should test if we can choose Cyber or at least Optical as the next tech.
I can do it by opening the next turn and checking if I do not have to actually play it later.
quote:
Lord BinTravkin,
As you are able to confirm from our databanks, we will complete research on Presentient Algorythms in 2189, which is one turn after you will have researched Centauri Meditation in 2188. For this reason, we will have a gap of 2 turns, since we are after you in turn order. There is although a solution to this problem:
If Gaian Union in 2188 chooses Cyberethics as the next research technology, after receiving from us:
- Cyberethics
- Presentient Algorythms
forwarded from us in 2189 and received by you in 2190, Gaian Union will be able to switch the research effort without loss of lab points in 2190 to Orbital Spaceflight.
Please confirm our analysis, so there is no error in our plan.
Sincerely,
Data Angels
IT Mart
quote:
IT Mart
The Gaian Union agrees on the deal described in your Cooperation Proposal:
1.Recieving the technologies of:
Cyberethics
Presentient Algorythms
from Data Angels in MY 2188 (is this possible?)
2.Researching Orbital SpaceFlight
3.Exchanging the Orbital SpaceFlight with Data Angels' newly researched Fusion Power technology.
Although the technology of Orbital SpaceFlight alone is extremely valuable, Gaian Union will feel somewhat indebted to Data Angels, which we hope to pay back in future by having further beneficial-to-both-sides deals and good relations.
We are in no position right now to divert energy as a payment for any value difference the deal might have because of need to rapidly expand our infrastructure and catch up with other factions, including Data Angels themselves.
In hope of longtime cooperation,
Lord binTravkin
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
binTravkin
|
|
Lord of Progress of the Council of Lords of Gaia
Jan 2004
time: 07:36
|
|
quote:
To Gaian Union,
Here are some recent finds pertaining to our operation of exchanging the abilities of drop and clean units. It is very important, that we both understand implications.
It appears, that when a drop-militia unit or any other drop scout unit is transferred to a faction for backengineering, it turns out to be just a scout.
I have checked the stuff in scenario editor and the fact is, that it seems to be the regular game feature. I tried two scouts with drop ability, different designs and they turned out to be simple scouts after turning over the control. Then I tried 1^-2-1 unit and it retained its drop ability. Then we have no choice here, but continue with transferring to you, Gaians our drop-AAA unit.
I have more bad news. I further tried to simulate our operation using actual drop-AAA. I was succesful to drop it and transfer control, but when the same unit was transferred back after upgrade to clean,drop it turned out to be again drop-AAA NOT clean!!! I tried with a new unit, and it worked the same, again it became after the transfer an AAA one NOT clean!
I attempted to backengineer the drop-AAA into drop,clean former, worked ok. After transfer the unit retained its capability as clean drop former. So we have no choice, but:
1) We drop to you our "drop-AAA unit"
2) You backengineer it to drop,clean former
2) You make drop,clean former and drop it back to us.
I checked also:
- making drop,clean former takes 5 rows!
upgrading either:
- former
- clean former
to drop,clean former costs 50 EC.
Any proposals on your side how we could proceed with these new findings?
Data Angels
IT Mart |
Asked them how much would 1^-2-1, clean cost
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36.
Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
21-07-2005 17:00
)
)
|