 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
The state is simply fulfilling it's primary function by doing that - I'm happy to pay for police and prisons to lock people up who "rise up and take stuff".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
Sounds like extortion, to me - I'm not going to encourage that behavior, or the threat of it, by paying off would-be thieves. You also overestimate the number of people who would have no recourse other than government welfare - private charity would pick up quite a bit of the slack, and for the remaining people who commit violent crimes, well, that's what prisons are for (and private ownership of firearms, of course).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
che,
quote: Just like the 19th Century, eh? |
There are more options for private charity now than then, with greater technology - or I should say, more ways for those who need charity to find it.
And way to not address my main points - my main point isn't whether or not charity would pick up all or even part of the slack, that isn't really relevant to me.
Gepap,
quote: Or they could decide to arrest people like you and redistribute the wealth. |
Sure, I suppose that's what people with guns could do. Wouldn't be moral, though, nor would it be very intelligent. Getting rid of the haves and giving their wealth to the have nots would result in a breakdown of the country, because to a large degree, the have nots are have nots for a good reason.
Odin,
quote: Oh great, not the Libertarian "tax is extortion" sh!t. |
Actually that wasn't precisely my point. My point was that paying taxes because otherwise people will have a revolution and take your money is sort of like paying protection money to the mafia - it's extortion, and there needs to be a better reason than that.
quote: Where I come from we consider the welfare state moral and proper and believe society should be for the good of all. |
Yeah, the people who do and have nothing should be supported by those who work and make money 
That's just silly - if those who actually earn their money want to help others, then they can and should. If not, and if those who don't have any money can't find any, then that is their sole responsibility. Not mine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
It costs more to police and incarcerate than it does simply to provide charity. . |
That almost seems to imply that charity could reduce the need for policing. I don't see that. Most of the reciepients I see are so strung out or down and out that they are incapable of any real planned appropriation of another's wealth . .. OR are poorer parents for whom crime is not at all a likely method.
Most of the housebreakers and embezzlers do NOT seem to be among the poorest
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|