 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:19
|
|
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...763#post3478763
It's relevant to all, I think, so it's better to post here probably:
quote:
I think I understand what our gracious Emperor is trying to say, Modo and Joncnunn, and want to spell it out for you.
The purpose of the Senate, and the DG as a whole, is to make decisions on major issues as a group.
The Senate should never, ever micromanage the Emperor. It's a succession game, still - the emperor has control over day-to-day affairs, and I would include in that the specific builds of specific cities, the specific uses of specific units (leaders/armies aside), and the specific build queues.
The Senate should encourage the Emperor in major issues - for example, stating that we should build more Legion IIIs, for example, but not necessarily *where*; that we should attack Carthage, and even attack Carthago Nova or Carthago (old), but not the specific unit moves to do so. Anything else is silly - we'd argue for months about it, and it's unreasonable. Assume the other emperors are competent. Just because they don't have the strengths of you, doesn't mean you should belittle them or be allowed to tell them what to do - go play SP if that's what you are into. Each of us has strengths and weaknesses, some more than others, but that's what is fun about DemoGames and particularly Succession Games- we get to see other people play other ways.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ormuzd
|
|
I disagree with Rasputin - e should keep the senate separated from the tavern. Otherwise our glorious empire will be swept out...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|