 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Is this the Russian version of Fox news?  |
It's the Russian version of Google actually.
Last edited by Serb on 26-11-2004 at 16:26
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Combat Ingrid
Regarding the poisoning issue, it should be fairly easy to determine whether he has been poisoned by dioxin or not. It accumulates in fatty tissues, so a small fat tissue sample should be enough. (of course, he may have been poisoned by a related compound that escapes detection by standard methods)
One of the effects of dioxin is to inhibit the immune system, which could, as Serb pointed out, lead to secondary infections.
I guess we will have to wait for conclusive data.
|
As I've said he already was examinated several times, first by Ukranian medics, then by Austrian medics, then by medical experts of the office of the public presecutor of Ukraine, then by medical experts of special commision of Ukranian parliament and ALL those experts find NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. The last examination of Yushenko (carried out by experts of special commission of Ukranian parliament) included tests on presence of traces of over than 200 various poisons.
Yushenko is a liar and the British doctor who make diagnosis after looking on the photo is a charlatan.
It is not possible to make toxicology diagnosis without any tests. This British doc is bulsh!ter and liar, no more, no less.
quote:
Btw, thanks for the wonderful gift, Serb  |
You are welcome.
May the force be with you.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Saras
A much more reasonable article:
|
Actually it's the fine example of western BS.
quote:
For most Ukrainians, these elections were not about being pro- or anti-Russian. The elections were primarily about ousting a corrupt clique from power in Kiev. It just happened that the clique came from the Russian-speaking east of the country. |
Blah...blah...blah...
Corrupt clique?
Yanukovich is corrupt? Any evidences?
One the other hand, Yushenko was a prime minister of Ukraine in 1999-2001, the memebers of his gang were high-ranked officials of Ukraine and they absolutely f*cked the country, robbed it. They were counterparts of Yeltsin's team of the same period. The second figure of his party miss Timoshenko was searched out by police of several countries for corruption and shady deals, but unfortunately she became a deputy of Ukranian parliament, recieved immunity and thus escpaed responsibility for here crimes (she robbed both Russia and Ukraine for hundrends of millions USD).
Basicaly, Yushenko and his gang are just a band of corrupt motherf*ckers, thieves, who already robbed Ukraine once and want to do it again
.
Now you claim that it is Yanukovich who is corrupt?
quote:
The country is divided between the nationalist west, around Lviv, and the largely Russian-speaking east around Kharkov and the coal-mining Donbass region. Yet the extent of that division can be exaggerated. And it probably has been, precisely because of the heavy-handed Russian intervention. |
BS.
Eastern regions contribute to 80% of Ukranian GDP.
Tot kto platit, to i zakazyvaet muzyku. Ty chto dumaesh, vostochnye ukrainci, kotorie real'no kormyat vse eti zapadnye regiony-donory, vot tak vot vozmut i prosto priznayut gosudarstvennyi perevorot osyshestvlyemyi etim pidorom Yushenko?
Last edited by Serb on 26-11-2004 at 17:01
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001
time: 05:18
|
|
I think it's about time for the Russians amongst us to accept that their days of glory are gone, and that they have the sphere of influence of a small gnat. If you can't even control within your own borders you shouldn't bother trying to project your power outside it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
Oh it's you again, Mr. "I belive in British shamans who can make diagnosis after a short look on the picture of their patient".
What the f*ck are you talking about?
Before the election, Putin made the official statement that Russia will work with ANY president elected by Ukranian people. Looks like Russia is the only rememing democracy in the world who agitate for legal solution of crisis through courts, not through "the voice of angry mob". The west is just pushing the country to the civil war, by to imposing its will - "accept our candidate or face the consequences) to Ukranian electorate. You think you can establish such double standards all around the world?
Who the f*ck do you think are you guys? New Hitlers?
Let them decide their own fate (they already did it actually) and accept their choice.
Last edited by Serb on 26-11-2004 at 17:26
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor
You know, that doesn't mean anything in a democracy, where the rule is "one person, one vote". No matter how wealthy the people are. |
Sure, but the other main point of democracy is to elect the guy who get support of majority of voters. The minority SHOULD accept the will of majority.
Yanukovich get 3% more than his rival, so in a real democracy minory should have accepted their defeat. But in Ukraine, they didn't, they think that their sponsors can help them to take the power in an illegal way, to help them to owerthrow the legaly elected president, elected by majority of Ukranian population (who are, by chance produce 80% of national GDP and feed this western minority. The western regions that supported Yushenko are donor-regions, subsidized by eastern regions).
There is no way in hell that majority of Ukranians (who once againe FEED this minority, by producing 80% of their GDP) will accept the candidate of MINORITY (and poor minority, I should remind) as new president.
So, if Yushenko will take the power somehow (and the only way to do this for him is an illegal way, And he is already on this road) there will be bloodbath, a civil war and as probaly the split of the country).
Last edited by Serb on 26-11-2004 at 17:44
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Atahualpa
|
 |
Hawthrone
Mar 1999
time: 06:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Serb
Sure, but the other main point of democracy is to elect the guy who get support of majority of voters. The minority SHOULD accept the will of majority.
Yanukovich get 3% more than his rival, so in real democracy minory should have accept their defeat. But in Ukraine, they didn't, they think that their sponsors can help them to take the power in illegal way, to help them to owerthrow the legaly elected president, elected by majority of Ukranian population (who are, by chance produce 80% of national GDP and feed this western minority. The western regions that supported Yushenko are donor-regions, subsidized by eastern regions).
There is no way in hell that majority of Ukranians (who once againe FEED this minority, bu producing 80% of their GDP) will accept the candidate of MINORITY (and poor minority, I should remind) as new president.
So, if Yushenko will take the power somehow (and the only way to do this for him is an illegal way, And he is already on this road) there will be bloodbath, a civil war. |
This is all based on the assumption that there was no election fraud. Currently this assumption is more than vague.
Don't try to build strong arguments on vague assumptions.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Serb
Sure, but the other main point of democracy is to elect the guy who get support of majority of voters. The minority SHOULD accept the will of majority. |
I completely agree
quote:
There is no way in hell that majority of Ukranians (who once againe FEED this minority, bu producing 80% of their GDP) will accept the candidate of MINORITY (and poor minority, I should remind) as new president. |
Indeed.
quote:
So, if Yushenko will take the power somehow (and the only way to do this for him is an illegal way, And he is already on this road) there will be bloodbath, a civil war. |
This is what I fear most. This is why I hope somebody will emerge than can unite both parts of the country behind him.
If anything, this crisis shows there is a very deep identity problem in Ukraine, as it is severely divided (far more so than the US between its 'Red' and 'Blue' States). To me, it proves the Ukrainian State is either not viable, and should be separated between an independent western part, and a Russian eastern part... or they should strive to find an agreement that give large autonomy to each half, like in Belgium.
It seems that a "winner takes all" political system is something Ukraine definitely can't afford.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001
time: 05:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Serb
Oh it's you again, Mr. "I belive in British shamans who can make diagnosis after a short look on the picture of their patient".
What the f*ck are you talking about?
Before the election, Putin made the official statement that Russia will work with ANY president elected by Ukranian people. Looks like Russia is the only rememing democracy in the world who agitate for legal solution of crisis through courts, not through "the voice of angry mob". The west is just pushing the country to the civil war, by to imposing its will - "accept our candidate or face the consequences) to Ukranian electorate. You think you can establish such double standards all around the world?
Who the f*ck do you think are you guys? New Hitlers?
Let them decide their own fate (they already did it actually) and accept their choice. |
Hook, line, sinker 
The OCSE says the election were truly flawed (and Russia happens to be a member of the OCSE afaik), as were the elections in Russia last year.
Russia is about as far removed from a proper democracy as Saddam era Iraq was. Repression of freedom of press, intimidation of candidates and voters etc etc. Putin is basically another authoritarian nutjob who so far has managed to hide it under a very thin veneer of democracy, but then (as you Godwin'd this thread already) so did Hitler when he started off. There's serious concerns in the EU about the direction Russia is taking. We were hoping after 1991 that you'd take a similar path has Poland has taken, but instead Russia's need for a authoritarian leader has shown through again, just as it has happened through out your history.
And yes this might jsut be a hyperbolic troll, but the general basis of it is laid in facts 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
Give me a couple of minutes. My English dropped pretty much thanks to a couple of litters of beer. We have a party here deicated to send-off of one of our employee to specnaz. How the hell you can understand me if make so many typos?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001
time: 05:18
|
|
Oh and btw, i didn't say i believed the eminent toxicologist in the Nature article (about the most important peer reviewed scientific journal in the world), I jsut reported because people were wondering what it could've been, and it makes more sesse than a plate of bad sushi or whatever it was you said it was.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Combat Ingrid
|
 |
Satan's Majestic Empire
Nov 2001
time: 06:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Serb
As I've said he already was examinated several times, first by Ukranian medics, then by Austrian medics, then by medical experts of the office of the public presecutor of Ukraine, then by medical experts of special commision of Ukranian parliament and ALL those experts find NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. The last examination of Yushenko (carried out by experts of special commission of Ukranian parliament) included tests on presence of traces of over than 200 various poisons.
Yushenko is a liar and the British doctor who make diagnosis after looking on the photo is a charlatan.
It is not possible to make toxicology diagnosis without any tests. This British doc is bulsh!ter and liar, no more, no less.
|
Is it published what exactly they were looking for? If he indeed was poisoned, it doesn't matter if they look for 100.000 substances, if they don't look for the specific substance that was involved, they will of course find nothing. Being a scientist, I can't accept vague statements such as "we didn't find anything", I want raw data 
But I agree about the British doctor. Sure, you can suspect dioxin poisoning from looking at the picture, but it's bad science to jump into conclusions like that 
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:18
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Atahualpa
1. There is no angry mob in the Ukraine, so far the demonstrations were quite peacefully as I heard.
|
Update your info. One of the leaders of those peacefull demonstrators called upon takeover of state's buildings to paralize the state and to blockade a roads to paralize the economy. And those peacefull demonstrators already captured few state's buildings and blockaded few roads. That's classified as crime in accordance with Ukranian law (article 314).
So they are not as peacefull as you think (according to Ukranian law they are criminals).
Besides, Yushenko proclaimed himself in parliament as the new president, BEFORE the Central Electoral Commision annoced official results of the election.
quote:
2. Russia is the shittiest democracy in the world and Putin has proven more than once how "democratic" he handles political opposition |
So far, Russia is the only country which agitated for resolution of the crisis in accordance with Ukranian consitution and law. Other countries just make threats - "accept Yushenko or dare the consequences".
And if you need an example of really shitty democracies, look at Afghanistan or Kosovo. There your advanced democratic societies find nothing wrong (since their candidate won).
quote:
3. Putin can talk as much as he wants, the way he acts, shows how he is like |
Any evidences?
quote:
All the EU is asking is a recount. |
Fine. I agitate for the same. If the opposition has evidences of unfair election, they should bring them in a court.
But, I have different opinion about EU and US position. I believe they want to make their candidate a president no matter how. THEY NEED HIM VICTOR.
quote:
If that seems to you that we don't let them decide their own fate you must be blinded, because quite obviously all we want is to make sure that exactly they really decide their own fate and Lord God Putin should stay where he belongs: in Russia. |
And Lord God George II and all other Lord Gods of Europe should stay where they belong- in USA and EU.
quote:
If he would have interest in a democratic Ukraine, then he would fully support EU's and US's claims for a recount, because it is more than obvious that there is something fishy. |
There is no anything obvious that something is fishy. You seem to do not understand.
The main role of observers is to OBSERVE and to COLLECT EVIDENCES for the court if there were any irregularities, NOT TO MAKE CONCLUSSIONS ABOUT LEGITIMACY or ILLEGITIMACY of ELECTION.
Only the court can make such conclusions, not US, not EU, not Russia, not any of thier observers, only GODDAMN COURT.
So why the hell the Russian president should support EU and US in their illegal claims about unfair election, considering that neither US nor EU can't make such statements (only Ukranian High Court can) and considering that observers from CIS (several hundreds of observers) said that there were some irregularities (from both sides), but they were minor and couldn't change the outcome?
quote:
Or ofc he is trying to hide something and knows more than we do... |
Sure he does. As president he has access to information that we do not have access.
quote:
If it turns out that Yanukovich was elected rightfully he shall be president, but if it proves that there was election fraud then Yushenko should be declared president and those who committed the fraud be punished. |
1) The victory of Yanukovich is not acceptable for US and EU. Yushenko is their bet, their investment and their whore.
2) You lack the knowledge about Ukranian law, in case if election turns out to be fraud, there will be NEW ELECTION and BOTH Yushenko and Yanukovich COULDN'T participate in this new election. That's their law.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.
Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-11-2004 10:06
|