 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
This, however, is why modern capitalist societies provide some form of safety net...
-Arrian |
Actually, they do it to preserve capitalism. The existence USSR, with all its problems, forced the capitalists to throw some crumbs to the poor. The fact that workers could seize and hold power in the world's largest country meant that if they had to do it here, they could do it here. Social reforms are a palliative to forestall revolution, nothing more. That's why as soon as the wall came down, the capitalists began attacking the social safety nets, not just in the U.S., but in the European social democracies as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kuciwalker
You think the workers seized and held power in the SU? |
Yes, and no. I was trying to keep the explanation simple. Imagine the USSR as basically a country run by the Teamsters Union. The union is a working class organization, so the workers have power, even if they don't have power over their union leaders. In order to maintain power, even just for its own benefit, the union bureaucracy still must rule in the interests of the rank and file, even as it exploits them. After all, without the union, there are no union bureaucrats.
You also have to remember that there's perception to deal with. In the 1930s, a lot of people considered the USSR to be a proletarian democracy. It seems silly to us today, but millions looked to the Soviet Union as an example, and the capitalists of the West knew it. They knew they could be replaced, and so sought to soften the sharp edges of capitalism. If you aren't in danger of starving or becomming homeless, revolution seems a lot less necessary.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:18
|
|
Ifind it amusing how dogged kid is in his assertion that he could simply take things created solely from Bezerker's labour, OR he could take it at a price that KID deems fair.
Since one of the base principle of Kid's theories is that labour creates all wealth then obviously any wealth that Bezerker has on their island (prior to any dealings between them) is solely a result of Bezerker's labour. Then ANY attempt by kid to appropriate Bezerker's MUST be exploitation
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:18
|
|
Che
while I can agree that the existence of communism may have helped soften the hard edges of capitalism in the past, I now see it as an ideology of decreasing relevance. Americans do not see communism as a real threat and most people view it as a discared failed form of government.
Frankly I don't see the threat of communist revolution even being a minor factor in determining social policy. Instead I see capitalist democracies that are for the most part comfortable with funding a pretty decent social safety net. .. . The US does this less well than most places.
As for any current attack on social programs, I see that as the normal pendulum effect within the spectrum of US policies. The US has moved right in the face of a "war" and I fully expect that a shift leftward will follow within the next 10 years. Social programs will be degraded for a time and then improved . .. its a pretty normal evolution.
Also I was wondering if you see the degradation of social programs in places other than the US. Here in Canada there are now talks of a pharmacare program and even some talks about a national daycare program (unlikely to happen but just the fact it is discussed is hardly an indicator that social programs are under attack)--
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
[W]hile I can agree that the existence of communism may have helped soften the hard edges of capitalism in the past, I now see it as an ideology of decreasing relevance. |
Well, we may not be setting agenda's today, but my point is that we are where we are today because of the existence of the USSR and the communist "threat." Previous to our dubious sucess in the USSR, the capitalists prefered method of dealing with working class demands was the billy club and the machine gun. Once they say that we could do away with them, they decided another option was called for.
quote: Frankly I don't see the threat of communist revolution even being a minor factor in determining social policy. |
Not so much today. Where we (I'm using a broad we here) have enough support to constitute a mass movement, they've pretty much watered down their message to social democracy (France, Italy, etc.).
quote: Instead I see capitalist democracies that are for the most part comfortable with funding a pretty decent social safety net.
Also I was wondering if you see the degradation of social programs in places other than the US. Here in Canada there are now talks of a pharmacare program and even some talks about a national daycare program (unlikely to happen but just the fact it is discussed is hardly an indicator that social programs are under attack)-- |
They've been underfunding healthcare for almost a decade now, haven't they? In Germany, they've decreased the length of the holiday. In France, they're trying to take back the decrease in the work week, in the U.S., welfare "reform," etc.
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 03-12-2004 at 21:12
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
Just to clarify. You think its OK to take the possessions of another if in your judgement they are "equally well off without them"?
|
If I pay him for something that doesn't cost him anything then how can that be fair?
quote:
Oh and what did Bezerker do at your expense. You are on the same island with the same resources. He worked and created stuff and now you say its ok to take it?? |
Did he buy the island to make a profit from me? Of maybe he didn't but now sees an opportunity to do so. Of course it's at my expense. If neither of us owned the island then there would be no question about me just eating the bananas.
Last edited by Kidicious on 03-12-2004 at 21:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
They've been underfunding healthcare for almost a decade now, haven't they? In Germany, they've decreased the length of the holiday. In France, they're trying to take back the decrease in the work week, in the U.S., welfare "reform," etc. |
I don't have the numbers at my fingertips but healthcare funding has skyrocketed IIRC but it NEVER seems to meet the demands for more and more funding. Its a constant fight since there seems to be no amount of money that quenches the appetite of the health care monster. My recollection is that health care funding has been increasing in most provinces even against inflation but I will check it out
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:18
|
|
If something happend to Berz's farm, then yes, I absolutely would employ him too, and both of you would recieve similar deals.
It is not in my self-interest to leave you entirely beholden to me, and why you would think so is completely alien to me.
If you are completely beholden to me, then I am REQUIRED to take care of you. That is a job I do not want.
Much preferable, IMO, would be to make use of your labor to better my own life, help you two get back on your feet, and trade with you as you do, so that we all become wealthier.
See, while you and berz are working my farm, I'll be using my free time to make the farm more efficient. Thus, when you and Berz go back to farming your own land, I'll STILL retain my free time, even in your absence. This will free me up to continue to innovate in the future, and I can trade the fruits of my innovative labor for stuff you guys are growing.
Heck, if I'm good enough at that, I might even get out of farming altogether.
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|