 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:17
|
|
Vel:
As I have maintained from the start, the main failing of your position is the complete and total lack of recognition that the people who apply capital to a given project create value by doing so. Compensatable value.
Ag:
How do they create value? Surely if someone donates land to a housing project, he does not create the value that the land has. Sure, he can add value to the land by clearing it and grading it himself, but that is effected by labour.
Two specific examples of the application of capital creating value:
1) The two homes I purchased above. They were for sale by folks who had been holding them for one-year plus. They were, for all intents and purposes, abandoned and sitting empty, and falling apart because of it. By assuming the responsibility of the mortgages (applying sufficient capital, I opened the door that *allowed* further capital to be spent (and labor applied) to make the needed improvements to make them livable again. A thing which previously was not happening, and there was no expectation that it would BE happening under the watch of the former owners.
2) (your example) A wealthy individual sells or donates land, and arranges a loan (both capital) to an enterprising young man to build a factory and start a business. Without the money and land to get started, the labor has nothing to DO. No focus. No land or machinery to work ON, no building to work IN. Without these, the project never gets off the ground.
In both of these examples, the layout of capital preceeds the need for physical labor. It lays the groundwork and foundation which makes the labor down the road possible. Without it, the enterprise would never have even drawn its first breath.
That seems....fairly valuable to me.
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
Wow, I missed quite a ruckuss. 
Vel, you slumlord, you! 
...
I can think of many reasons people might prefer renting over home ownership. Not forever, of course! My friend, Tom, is trying to get his PhD. He's been out in Chicago for a year + now, working at UChicago (in a Masters program), and is currently applying to numerous universities for his PhD. Thus, he will have been in Chicago for ~2 yrs, and will be moving on to ?? for the next, what, 6 years? Prior to this he was in Boston teaching & trying to get into PhD programs.
While in Boston, he and his wife purchased a Condo. When it came time to leave for Chicago, they had to sell. In the time inbetween, the housing market had fallen somewhat, and they ended up taking a $15,000 loss on the condo. Doh!
In Chicago, they rented. I expect that this time when they move, they will look to buy.
People's needs are variable depending on their personal situation, Kid. Just because YOU want to own a home doesn't mean that everyone does (right now).
The way I read it, Vel put down 15% of the value of these houses, borrowed the rest from the bank, and then spent his labor (and more money) fixing them up. He now receives rent a useage fee from those who live there. I see no exploitation.
That's not to say there aren't bad landlords. As Che's recent experience with trying to find a new apartment illustrates, it can be tough if you're strapped for cash and have to move to where the jobs are.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
I call bullshit. You don't own three houses by working even if you are a doctor. You aren't telling us something. |
And why not?? I only own 1 but I could easily own 2 or 3 but they would be mortgaged and with the renters providing an income to cover the mortgage. I actually have not done this because I wasn't willing to take the risk of such an investment and also because I didn't have the time to perform the necessary LABOR. I can make more money I figure by working more at my job.
I haven't done it but I know many people that do do this even with only moderate incomes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
I think people deserve compensation for:
- labor (to me, this includes thinking/managing, not just manual labor)
- assumption of risk
- ingenuity/invention
I think that about covers it...
-Arrian |
How about for an increase of value in something they purchased using cash gained through labor or innovation? Or is that part of the assumption if risk element
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
Kid
There are places with actual surplus houses.
Take rural Newfoundland as an example. There are isolated communities where every time a family leaves or a preson living alone passes away, there is another empty house.
If a family wants to vacation there for a few months or a novellist wanted to go there for inspiration, shouldn't they be allowed to RENT. People are unlikely to want to buy since there is no guarantee that they could EVER resell
More generally Kid you miss out on some basic things
1. There are people who prefer to rent for any number of reasons even if they could afford to buy.
2. Whether a home is owner-occupied or rented is irrelevant to the issue of scarcity of homes in an area. In California I don't see home prices abating at all even if there was no "speculative ownership" .. . you still have the exact same number of people wanting a place to live
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:17
|
|
My uncle, who was one of 7 children who grew up in the house his mothers family had built for themselves became a doctor, and ow he has 4 properties, One huge 8 room house, a beach house, a house in the hills, an apartment in the City, none of which he rents.
Anyways, what does renting a property have to do with capitalism?
Capitalism =/ free markets, or even markets. Its a much more complicated relation, and of course, making money a commodity in itself. A Landlord is not a capitalist, since a feudal lord or a Mercantalist might as well be a landlord.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|