17-05-2005 19:44									#91
	Put an end to popups!

Well, the 8 was a bit arbitrary anyway (the range of our MMI-enhanced cruisers)

I'd be in favor of cutting back to a 6-tile zone. That way it's in range of both our cruisers and foils

That gives us adequate coverage everywhere - east and west coast

Attachment: modo (2).gif
This has been downloaded 69 time(s).

	17-05-2005 20:00									#92
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote: Originally posted by Googlie That gives us adequate coverage everywhere - east and west coast

"Adequate coverage" does not scare people. Neither does it give enough protection by our patrolling vessels. With only 6 tiles, a Cruiser hull (soon to be theirs, whether we like it or not) can come close for a 2-turn approach (get in and hide, then get out of hiding and strike) much easier than with the 8-tile zone. A 6-tile zone would soon make such attacks possible with Foils, and that is not nice at all. I though the idea was to be able to do as we please well before any threat emerges. Well, having anyone make two stops in our waters before an attack is definately something I appreciate.

Why is an agreement for the Morgan coastal waters not acceptable, again?

	17-05-2005 22:41									#93
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Well, IMO there's "reasonable bullying" and "unreasonable intransigence"

And 8 tiles is verging on the unreasoinable (we might as well declare the entire ocean ours - we'll sink any vessel we find anywhere

When we postulated the Doctrine, at that time we were open to negotaition as to its severity - why not now, when we're weaker?

It's not just their coastal waters they want access to and from - they want to send vessels exploring, and if every time they move they run the risk of breaching an exclusion zone that they don't even know about (they still don't have our maps) then the game ceases to be fun and we'll see defections from their team

It's a fine line we play beytween bullying, backing down to give breathing room, and intransigence, and I just feel that 8-tiles is intransigent, arbirtary as it was at the time

Mead PM'd me to express concern that we're stifling the game, and I agree

I'll bow to the wishes of the team in this, but as a past CMN I fully see his point

G.

	17-05-2005 22:56									#94
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by Googlie When we postulated the Doctrine, at that time we were open to negotaition as to its severity - why not now, when we're weaker?

We are not weaker. We still possess about the only credible navy on Chiron, and the strongest air force along with it. But you are right—we were open to negotiations. So, what price shall we ask for making the prohibited zone smaller?

quote: Originally posted by Googlie Mead PM'd me to express concern that we're stifling the game, and I agree

That is sad, and sometimes our motives might indeed seem "unreasonable" in some way. So, as long as it stays Spartan enough, and does not weaken us too much, we can consider negotiations. Just remember that bullying is an important part of overall strategy for us.

A general comment on the status of other teams. Our position has been strong for a while now, and not showing signs of weakening—more like growing more unstoppable with every turn. So, we are the strongest contender for a win, by whatever means. People are beginning to see this, and some leave because of it. Now, your good will is nice, Googlie, and I understand good sportsmanship. But I still prefer winning over good will. If we play too nice, we might still lose the game. So please, let us not do that.

	18-05-2005 02:30									#95
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I don't disagree that we are playing to win, but let's not forget that this is a democracy game, born of the original one.

Some criticized ACDG2 as being too much like a regular individual PBEM (originally Archaic unilaterally made all the University turns and Buster made all the Drone ones), so ACDG3 was conceived as a compromise between the 2 styles - a lot of roleplay like ACDG01 had, but by removing co-operative victory, winning playstyles were rewarded.

For me, winning is almost secondary. The game is fun, and I've learned a ton from it, veteran though I consider myself to be. And I've enjoyed the artwork, the naming conventions, the strategy discussions, etc etc.

And, for the record, I don't think we are now unstoppable. In fact, if any faction is, it might be Morgan. Their airforce now dwarfs ours, and they have better defenders now. As soon as they switch from their 70% economy/0% labs to anything approaching normal research rates they'll outstrip us in research - although they might just stay as they are for as long as it takes them and the Gaians to pincer the Hive into submission. After all, they are only a Neural Grafting trade away from clean reactors, and then they can gear up their offensive machine

And i do agree that bullying is in-game Santiago character. but let's not get too carried away (I assume you did take my point - why not just declare Chiron's oceans off-limits to everyone but Sparta and our allies? - 'cos that'd be unreasonable, as well as almost impossible to enfiorce. So what's so magic about 8, except that it's the number that we first put on the table (and even then, it originally was 8 tiles from our coastline - we soon tempered that back to "8 from any Spartan or Protectorate base"

To me, 6 is just as statement-making, and delivers a lot more fun for everyone.

At least that's my considered position, but as I say, I'll bow out of the discussion if the concensus is to stay with 8

	18-05-2005 04:30									#96
	Put an end to popups!

Mead has inquired about the possibility of a split-zone (equidistant from both our factions)

It'd look like this:

Attachment: morgan modo.gif
This has been downloaded 61 time(s).

	18-05-2005 11:55									#97
	Suffering from ads?

quote: Originally posted by Googlie Mead has inquired about the possibility of a split-zone (equidistant from both our factions) It'd look like this:

This is even less than 6 tiles. This is getting ridiculous!

Did you ask a price, any price for our possible concessions?

Can you either post the PMs, or ask Mead to use the embassy? I feel like we are missing some points here.

	18-05-2005 15:36									#98
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

I won't take position about the 8-tile question but I'm backing Modo on this one.
WHAT? The game's not funny anymore because we enforce the Modo Doctrine? Too bad for them! But it's their job to find a way to turn the corner and find the solution, be it brute force, negociations or alternate strategy.
I remember we said once that we apply the Modo Doctrine because we can enforce it and would be ready to consider others with sea-rights when they'll get a navy.
This game has so many possibilities that I can't even understand what they say: we stifle the game?!?
At the very least, they just have to rush their first satellite and they'll know our borders, and much more. Or ask the Angels for the world map. Or steal it from Lal or God knows what!

Now, there are a lot of negociations options:
-- We give them (for a good price, of course) the coordinates of our shore-tiles and thus they'll know where the Doctrine is applying.
-- Open Seas: we propose (for a ...) that they'll send recon vessels to map our shore (with agreement when and how)
-- we can agree to let them sea-roads (permanent or provisonal) to let their naval convoys pass .
-- As said, we can tighten the 8-tile zone to 6 or something else.

	18-05-2005 20:54									#99
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: originally posted by Modo Can you either post the PMs, or ask Mead to use the embassy? I feel like we are missing some points here

*************************************************

Here's the exchange:

Mead to Googlie

quote: Googlie I've had difficulty getting into the embassy lately. Although I haven't got into the embassy lately and haven't looked at the map lately either, I note that the unmodified Modo doctrine would extend into our territorial waters (and even our landmass). Is that your intention? If so, it'll stifle the game and players will lose interest quickly Please let me or AndId know through PM. Mead

Googlie to Mead:

quote: I have put a proposal to the Junta that we scale back our doctrine to be 6 tiles from a land base. that would give us the protection we think we need as well as giving you clear egress from your ports

Mead to Googlie

quote: Are you going to continue to build or capture towards us? What happens then? Can we have a division line where we divide the distance between our respective bases in half, with each half being the territorial waters of the side closest to it? Mead

Googlie's reply to Mead

(re; the "build or capture" question)

quote: I think it will play out that we'll see a vessel in our "no-go" zone when we open the turn, and will query its intent from the transgressor. If we are satisfied as to its reason for being there, it'll be allowed to proceed unharmed (although some oficers are suggesting a "safety fee" much like the AI does in-game). If we are not satisfied then I guess it will be captured or destroyed (I'm not sure what the Junta would do if a "target of opportunity" presented itself - say a transport with an AA in it) As to the "build" question - we are assessing our chances of winning by Transcendence - although the odds greatly favour you, then the Angels. We'd need to invest heavily in the University (hence our "Protectorate contact"concerns) for us to have a chance And we assume that at some point the Hive will sneak-attack us - he has over 20 units within a couple of tiles of 2 of our bases, albeit in his own territory

(re: the "split-zone" demarcation line between our continents}

quote: I'll put the suggestion to the Junta. Some have already asked what recompense Morgan might offer in exchange for dropping our exclusion zone from 8 to 6 tiles, to allow egress from your westcoast base(s), so I doubt if a 4-tile zone would fly. But you never know.

	18-05-2005 21:17									#100
	Remove this text

quote: Originally posted by Googlie Mead PM'd me to express concern that we're stifling the game, and I agree

IIRC factions also complained we were stifling the game back when we weren't generous in tech trades. Yet now they have achieved technological parity with us by other means. So I don't fully understand their concern. It's not like they're a dog half-beaten to death with nowhere to go or nothing to do. As you say yourself, the Corporation still is in the running. And Mead's comment here "The game is not over yet" might be interpreted they're just waiting their time to get back at us at the earliest opportunity. (Spartan paranoia here )


For the record though, personally I don't have a strong opinion regarding the Modo Doctrine.

For a possible compromise that allows the Corporation breathing room and us security, how about making a difference between zones where ships are allowed. and zones where aircraft are allowed? We could each have an exclusion zone where the other one's ships are not allowed. And besides that also a zone where both factions' aircraft can fly over to patrol.

As a possible compensation, how about an official Corporate promise that they're not allowed to build non-SAM aircraft? That limits their offensive capability, and gives us security.

	18-05-2005 21:27									#101
	Support Apolyton

quote: Originally posted by Googlie It's not just their coastal waters they want access to and from - they want to send vessels exploring, and if every time they move they run the risk of breaching an exclusion zone that they don't even know about (they still don't have our maps) then the game ceases to be fun and we'll see defections from their team

Oh bugger. They don't have our map? Are you sure?

I thought the Corporation had it, based on some comment made in the Planetary Conference thread. After all, they have been pacted with the University for a year.
I included that election map showing our continents in the last Phalanx, thinking that it was a nice graphical addition, and thinking that I wasn't giving away anything important. Only the Gaians would learn something new, and who cares about them anyway?


Btw, on this screenshot you show our exclusion zone not to include the Styx Straits. May I suggest to change that? The Corporation has no business in the Arcadian Ocean aka Mare Nostrum.

	18-05-2005 22:26									#102
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

Not to worry:

Actually, I'm not sure that they don't have our maps - after all, we did find the Hunter hiding in the fungus just outside GH, so they knew that base was there

And based on Mead's comments, it looks as though they have some knowledge of our western shoreline, if not our actual base locations (as we do with the Angels)

So the balance of probability is that they do have our map

	18-05-2005 22:30									#103
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Sooo... do we have a price for making the no-swim zone smaller (6 tiles flat, everywhere)? Do you think they will agree to build defensive aircraft only? It would be nice of them, but I believe it is too much (think about their other problem—Yang). Maybe we need to come up with a fallback possibility? A small yearly fee, perhaps?

	18-05-2005 22:54									#104
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Or maybe their support for our run at Governor next election?

in fact, we could throw that in as well with any Plan Econ deal to the A's, G's as well as Morgan

	19-05-2005 02:19									#105
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Hmm - this properly belongs here (posted by mistake in the Angels thread):

quote: Proposed Bilateral amendment to the MoDo Doctrine between the Federation and the Corporation WHEREAS: The Corporation agrees to pay to the Federation the sum of 250 energy credits and the Corporation undertakes not to trade Planetary Economics to any third party and The Corporation agrees not to build the Secret project, the Cyborg Factory and the Corporation acknowledges the right of the Federation to be the sole means of the Corporation contacting the Unibversity, however such contact is initiated then in recognition of these undertakings: The Federation agrees to a sea border between the Federation and the Corporation, and the University and the Corporation equidistant between the two respective continents in question and The Federation will transmit the technology of Planetary Economics to the Corporation and The Federation undertakes not to build the Secret Project the Ascetic Virtues

	19-05-2005 05:54									#106
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Posted it to the Embassy

I'm thinking - why don't we tell all 3 that we've offered similar deals to all 3 factions, and start a bidding process for Planetary Economics.

we are duty bound not to build the AV, but that doesn't mean that we can't extract the highest price for the tech.

After all, we are not obliged to trade the tech itself to the Angels, just that we won't build the AV

	19-05-2005 07:55									#107
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Yes making them aware that the tech is up for grabs by all other factions and that we will only give one of them the tech is a good move. Probably increases the chance of someone taking our offer.

As for the Modo doc I was thinking that they'd pay us a (yearly?) fee for a negotiated sea border.

	26-05-2005 19:19									#108
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Any progress on our territorial differences, possible trades and a peace treaty?

	26-05-2005 22:53									#109
	Tired of ads?

No - a big "yawn" from Morgan - I e-mailed 3 of their officers when I first posted our offer in the Embassy, but nothing in reply

	09-07-2005 02:33									#110
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I suggest that we propose a "normalization' of relations with Morgan - a Treaty, with no strings attached.

We'd have 22 paired bases (they have 22, we have 25) which would represent prolly 24 credits per for us, and 44 for them (being Morgan, 1 extra per base, but no large multiple credit bases such as we have)

If we agree to go ahead, I'll try to resuscitate the "profit sharing" arrangement we had whereby we get 1/3rd of the excess that they earn through the treaty

	09-07-2005 07:03									#111
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

I'm thinking "maybe" regarding the normalization of relations with Morgan. Right now they aren't as huge of a threat. Even if, with such a deal, they get x2 the benefits, we still get x1, which is better than what the Angels and Gaians get with such a deal (no benefit). Then again, Morgan will be going up against us soon...it's hard for me to say.

	09-07-2005 11:23									#112
	Got spare money?

Do you think to:

• Ask for a Treaty.
  
• Make them declare war over something silly.
  
• Destroy some bases in righteous retaliation.

?

Worked once already...

But seriously, what is the next target? If not Morgan, I think we can look nice for a while.

	09-07-2005 18:33									#113
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

It's really a question of what our mid-term strategy is to be.

One possibility would be to have a period of peace & prosperity and grow ourselves to, say, ten size-14 bases, 20 size-7 bases and another 20 new bases anywhere from 2 to 6 citizens. Forested, mined and boreholed to the max. We still have some expansion room on our homeland continent.

Arcadia is largely empty in the middle and around the perimeters (we must leave Zak a little room to grow, and Lal, if he ever becomes our submissive) and after AU and Fort Sup reach size 14 they prolly can run a +2 nut surplus and churn out a colony pod every turn with no sweat

So this approach would be a combination of pop-booming and IVS'ing

	10-07-2005 00:15									#114
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

I guess it all depends on how long we can count on things remaining peaceful with the Angels. How long will they want to stay in builder mode? But it sounds like an excellent idea.

	26-07-2005 00:44									#115
	Suffering from ads?

Still no reply from Morgan about the Bio-engineering / Planetary Economics deal ? One week later!

It's one thing not wanting to negociate or share with us, it's another one not to reply. It borders on unpoliteness: they could at least write a witty rebuffal.

Someone should post something on the public forum! They complain about the game losing its appeal and people not participating, and they don't even make any effort to roleplay.
We could as well be playing against 5 AIs,it would be the same...

	26-07-2005 01:17									#116
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote: Originally posted by vishniac We could as well be playing against 5 AIs,it would be the same...

We have to start kicking them again. That is guaranteed to provoke some answers.

	26-07-2005 01:25									#117
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote: Originally posted by Modo44 We have to start kicking them again. That is guaranteed to provoke some answers.

Yeah, Man!
With upgraded X-needlejets, we're sure to get some interesting ones...such as "Aaaaaarrrgggghhhh!"

	26-07-2005 01:41									#118
	Got spare money?

Since we not have conducted diplomacy with them for a long time, my bet is that they don't check the embassy anymore, and sending them a PM alerting them of the offer would be the best way to get a reply.

	26-07-2005 06:36									#119
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

with both Morgan and the Angels, I've e-mailed some 2 to 3 players each time I posted in the Embassy

At least with the Angels it drew a response "It'll be discussed"

	26-07-2005 07:43									#120
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Hmm, in that case, perhaps a "reconnaissance" flight with X-needlejets or probe teams isn't such a bad idea after all...

Or perhaps a Phalanx article "Total silence on the comm frequencies over the Buster Ocean - Junta considers sending expedition force to check out if nothing bad happened."