 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:34
|
|
quote:
I wasnt thinking of the electorate so much as the politicos. Would Dawa, SCIRI etc have been the same months earlier - or the independents on the UIA slate?
I'm not sure what you mean by that..? |
The moderation shown by the UIA slate - i think its part of a process of political maturing that was far from complete under the IGC.
quote:
Heck, would the election have been the same before Sadr was neutered in Najaf in August? And once youre that far along, your well into the period when the insurgency is at its height
Well before April, Sadr was a nonissue. And by what metric do you say that the insurgency was at its height? It seems to me that the insurgency picked up around April when we went into Fallujah (the first time) and after Sadr.. |
Im saying that if we had gone to elections in March 2004, we'd have had a major Sadr problem, and a Fallujah problem - they would have made their moves ealier than they in fact did.
quote:
You also certainly wouldnt have had as strong Iraqi security forces available on election day as happened - it would have had a much more American face
As for the face of election security, I don't think it matters much anyways since it's crappy guerilla tactics to attack during high security; as we've seen, there was very little election violence.. |
Yes, there was little violence, cause there was high security. If we wanted an election in March 2004, wed have needed high security then, to ward off violence Given the sorry state of Iraqi forces then (if you want to blame the Bushies for THAT id have a hard time disagreeing) that would have meant all American forces, mostly. And the shot in the arm to Iraqi pride that the Feb 2005 elections have meant wouldnt have taken place. It would have been "an election unde occupation" when almost reverything was under US control - it would have had very different implciations than the election that took place - it would have been less "owned" by the Iraqis.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:34
|
|
quote:
The moderation shown by the UIA slate - i think its part of a process of political maturing that was far from complete under the IGC. |
You believe that SCIRI, Da'wa, etc. would've been more Islamist? Or would've taken a harsher stance towards the Sunnis? Why'd you say that?
quote:
Im saying that if we had gone to elections in March 2004, we'd have had a major Sadr problem, and a Fallujah problem - they would have made their moves ealier than they in fact did. |
But we made the first move in both cases. Especially in Sadr's case, where we triggered the revolt by going after that Sadrist paper. He was a young punk rejected by the Najaf establishment with only daddy's name going for him, and we made him into a hero for poor Shia by having the hubris to think we could break a movement that survived right under Saddam's nose.
quote:
Yes, there was little violence, cause there was high security. If we wanted an election in March 2004, wed have needed high security then, to ward off violence Given the sorry state of Iraqi forces then (if you want to blame the Bushies for THAT id have a hard time disagreeing) that would have meant all American forces, mostly. And the shot in the arm to Iraqi pride that the Feb 2005 elections have meant wouldnt have taken place. It would have been "an election unde occupation" when almost reverything was under US control - it would have had very different implciations than the election that took place - it would have been less "owned" by the Iraqis. |
Fair point, but I really see that as a reason to delay elections. I mean, surely an elected gov't, even with an election generally under the auspices of American protection, would've given the Iraqis a far greater sense of ownership of their gov't than simply anointing a new gov't. And that elected gov't could've organized Iraqi security forces, etc.
quote:
Interesting Ramo - you accept Zbig's statement that the US could have propped up the Shah longer but chose not to - ive quoted that myself in support of US moderation, but Ive been told that Zbig was full of it, that there was no prospect of a counter-rvoultionary coup (oddly, those who consider Zbig full of it on Iran, consider him gospel on "the bear trap" in afghanistan) |
Sullivan (Amb. to Iran) seemed to think that Brzezinski was full of ****, but I don't know. Even if domestic support was limited, there was always Iraq to help crush the revolutionaries. Besides, Iran was an important client state, one of the lynchpins of the ME policy, so one'd expect strong support for the Peacock throne just out of inertia.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34.
Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-03-2005 08:17
.
|