 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
Why was bilingual education seen as worse?? I know that here, the students in Frnch immersion almost always come from the top students and in fact I know some programs where students have to maintain pretty high averages in order to stay in the program
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
I agree with Mrs. Tubs
Separating kids based on their gpa or the like is stupid. The cream will always rise to the top, no matter how strong the coffee. |
NIce saying and I agree that the best will be the best no matter how you line them up.
But
-- will the best be bored when the schooling is catering to the middle child
-- will the weaker student be lost if the teacher goes at a middle pace
Or does the whole class lag while trying to help the weakest? The practical reality is that a teacher cannot teach at 30 or 10 or even 3 different speeds at the same time.
I see some benefits to separation by ability . . . I also see some benefits to classes of mixed ability . . . So why not have both? You can separate by ability for some classes and more randomly for others. Students get some teaching at their level but aren't totally segregated.
I went to school that graduated 30 students a year so none of this was possible except for some voluntary segregation by subject in high school. The result was that better students were usually bored although I did spend a fair bit of time tutoring a friend of mine in math ( he was university caliber in anything non-mathematical)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:17
|
|
Teachers tend to design lesson plans based around the lowest common demonator, and that does suck. However, a student that is able to prove that they are above that demonator will eventually move into advance course (AP and the like) or get better grades that will eventually lead to a better education.
The HS I went to was very heavily competitive amongst students and peers, and I thought that while this is good, it can also be bad. Your "get out of my way you are slowing me down" is not only selfish but derives the student from other lessons that school teaches besides what the teacher puts on that lesson plan.
Like I said the cream eventually rises to the top. That is why there are AP courses, that is why some HS allow students to forgo classes to attend Unis nearby, that is why when teachers identify students who need more attention they get it.
One of the guys that was in my classes during HS was probably the smartest person I know. He got a full ride to Harvard, got a BS in Chemical Engineer in 3 years, than a Masters in 1, and then a medical degree... And now, he is a teacher. He didn't know he wanted to be a teacher until he was doing field work in some 3rd world country as a doctor. Had he been segregated from his clients, or shielded from the world, we wouldn't have such a well educated and inspired teacher in our systems.
Defining walls encourages the creation of castes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
Why do some people here see some separation by ability to be screwing the poorer students? My dad taught for 30 years at a junior high level and his opinion was that more of the weaker students did better and learned more when it was paced a little slower and they weren't intimidated so much . He thought that the end result was a BETTER education for everyone.
Why is it so wrong to acknowledge that people have different abilities?? We do it in sports at an early age.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mrs. Tuberski
Ill say because You are pointing out the students weaknesses and alienation isnt the answer. This i believes give the student the excuse of hell I can be lazy I dont have to try anymore. Hell everybody already knows Im dumb so I will be dumb. |
What is more alienating?? Being completely lost for year after year with the regular pace of instruction or getting ther sense of accomplishment from success in a class where you can succeed.
** Note that I did not support total segregation but was seeing it more as something for harder subjects. If the kids were mixed differently for each subject I don't see how there would be that much alienantion anyway ( lets figure 5 of 7 subjects are mixed randomly and for 2 subjects they are done on ability-- )
I just don't see any negative consequnce ovverriding the fact that you can at least challenge the good students better while instructing the weaker students at a pace where they can cope better. Do it in a couple of the tough subjects and you will see a lot less boredom among the top students.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|