 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zulu Elephant
|
|
I really dont see this thing about Blair being pursuaded by Bush to go to war.
He's ALWAYS been an international interventionist - even when Clinton was in power. As i said before - HE was the one pushing the Americans for action in Kosovo.
He has never been the sort of leader that needed to be convinced into using the military to stop oppression. Thats why i cant understand the lap dog thing. Im CERTAIN that he was, probably for very different reasons to Bush, always in favour of taking out Saddam.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
The main issue is that he did not use the moral reasons for action in Iraq, but went with the (later found to be exaggarated and spin doctored to hell) WMD reason. TBH if you're going to be doing it for the "ooh he's big bad dictator who oppresses his people" reason, then be consistent and at least slap embargos/sanctions on ones like Saudi, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, Myanmar etc etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zulu Elephant
|
|
We had slapped sanctions on him for years and they hadnt done any good - just hurt the wrong people
|
|
|  |
 |
|
child of Thor
|
|
Zulu, i'm aware of all those arguements. I'm also aware of the other options that could have been used to go the UN route and get a true international ruleing.
But Bush(and maybe Blair?) had already decided(it is becoming quite clear)when the war would happen, and needed the right window of opportunity for military action, which was the whole real reason for war(as that leaked memo from the pentagon proved - it was about oil).
Disgusting behaviour all round i think, and from two countries that should be using their positions in a much more positive way to effect real good change in the world.
And as lightblue mentioned, consistancy is really important in the fight for real justice in the world.
Taking peoples lives for the sake of you and your friends all ready huge bank balances, is not what i call decent behaviour.
Last edited by child of Thor on 05-05-2005 at 18:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zulu Elephant
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
Probably the type of schmuck who believe in Progressive taxation based on income |
This is what tax credits do. Give tax back to those at the bottom.
quote: state ownership of essential utilities and services, |
If you want to renationalise coal, steel, water and gas and things like that I'll have to disagree with you. The world doesnt work like that anymore and its just a waste of money. Far too many arguments to go into here.
quote: Universal free education |
I assume you're talking mainly about tuition fees. The tuition fees policy invests much needed money for the growing number of university students (surely a progressive ideal) without burdening students with up-front fees and only makes them pay when they're earning (and therefore not poor anymore). Also poorer students get grants and dont have to pay anything back.
Is your talking about private money in education...so what? Blair visited a school that, in 1997 had only a 7% GCSE pass rate. Now its 25% thanks to private investment...surely a good thing?
quote: and in silly ideas like having Police Officers rather than CSOs. |
Why only have one type of policeman? We have different types of doctors for different things.
quote: And perhaps even a party that would have a second elected house to balance the Commons rather than an appointee chamber? |
Fair point but i think there's going to be moves on this (and a free vote) after the election
quote: I want a real labour party ZE - one that represents the working class. These pseudo Tories that Tony leads spend far too much time pandering to the middle classes. Sod the middle classes - they are not the foundation of this country - gain a majority this time then hammer the ingrates with taxation. |
If the Labour party only won working class votes (even if they won every Working class vote) they would permenantly be in opposition. Plus, the middle class contribute a lot to the country and to needlessly malign them shows a lack of compassion for hard worksing people who are just trying to get by.
Yes there are a lot of horrible selfish middle class people who dont care about the working class. But there are plenty of working class people who go out and vote BNP. They're all worthy of compassion and help. The government should be there for EVERYONE not just single sections of society - otherwise we're no better than the tories.
quote: Wishful thinking - it will take a brave party to abandon what is called the centre right these days. |
Labour is on the centre-left
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Immortal Wombat
|
 |
in perpetuity
Dec 2000 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lightblue
Problem with a lot of students is that they're registered in their home seats, not Cambridge Central. Even then, the vote would probably be split Tory/Lib Dem anyway, it's not like say Manchester Univ where you could guarantee a 90% Labour vote. |
Every undergrad at least gets registered to vote in Cambridge. They can apply for a postal vote as well, but if they don't use it, they can vote in Cambridge.
quote:
I assume you're talking mainly about tuition fees. The tuition fees policy invests much needed money for the growing number of university students (surely a progressive ideal) without burdening students with up-front fees and only makes them pay when they're earning (and therefore not poor anymore). |
No, a growing number of university students is a stupid ideal. It devalues degrees, it practically forces people to go to university to get any sort of decent job, and it means that all the practical trades have massive trouble getting skilled workers. Plus, tuition fees don't even come close to covering the university's expenses for the student, so they still can't afford to keep the increased numbers anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
Think the first seat might start declaring around midnight BST, the winner should be known by 4am or so, all the results in by late afternoon tomorrow I guess.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
I know Laz. Still inconsistent though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
who are the basic contenters in the UK?
blair who's labour
that keneddy for liberals
and someone for conservatives?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|