 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Thread Police,
The aftereffects of that story are just as important, and it is important to understand WHY they happened. |
Are you saying that it is impossible to discuss quality of journalism as an seperate issue ?
Of course bad journalism has aftereffects, that is one of the serious problems about it, but to drown the discussion in these aftereffects doesn't really do anything good about preventing bad journalism.
You have a very weak point about the environment that allowed an unchecked story go public, but is that an excuse for newsweek to print a nonverified story ?
What really intererest me is what mechanisms was shortcut in this case. They knew that it was a story that would make headlines; they knew that their information wasn't confirmed, but still they printed it. Why ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by atawa
Couldnt be bothered to read through the whole thread...your point? |
You don't have to - page one should be enough (evene without reading the OP).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Nope, I already addressed it
|
Actually, you have done anything else than that (ok, almost).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
No, just as it is not impossible to add in the effects of the story. You're just being anal.
|
Ouch, we are getting desperate aren't we ? No arguments ? well just pull out the good ole weapon - personal insults.
quote:
You're completely missing the relationship between them publishing a story and the effects of it. And no it's not an excuse and never once have I made excuses for Newsweek. Maybe you missed the part where I said they should be brought up on charges.
|
Where has I ever stated that there are no relationship between the story and the effects ?
quote:
The reason what they did was so severe was the effects that their story had ON AN ALREADY TENSE SITUATION. The situation was already tense because of what I have pointed out, which were the past abuses of the US. Get it?
|
If you really think that the effects of the story was so bad, why are you then trying so hard to change the subject from the false story to something about torture ?
quote:
What interests YOU is not what everybody is else is interested in. Is that a hard concept to grasp?
|
Oh, very nice of you to tell me that I'm not allowed to have an opinion different than yours and that you are representative for all others. If you want to discuss torture, fine with me, but that isn't the topic of this thread.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
I can't help it if you can't read. Torture is directly related to the topic at hand, because of past incidents. Other people seemed to have voluntarily joined in to the discussion, by the way. If you can't grasp the interrelationship of it and how it complements the subject, that's your own fault. The silly Framing game is getting played out though.
|
Nope, the topic is journalists release unconfirmed story - what are the impacts of this - why did they do it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Yes, what are the impacts, a bunch of people died, why were they so angry.
|
Try stand up in Kansas and say that you use the bible as toilet paper.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
You don't have to go through step 1 and 2 to get the reaction - it's religion and thereby defies any kind of logic or prehistory.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|