 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:23
|
|
@Mods: I think the other EU-constitution thread is specific to France. The debate in the Netherlands is a completely different beast to the French one. So, please don't merge the threads 
From the BBC:
quote: Dutch vote on Europe constitution
People in the Netherlands are voting on the European Union constitution, just three days after a "No" vote plunged France into crisis.
Early reports suggest voting has been brisk so far among the country's 11.6 million voters.
The Dutch prime minister appealed to the nation to back the treaty but polls predict 60% of voters will oppose it.
Many who intend to vote "No" share their European neighbour's fears about EU expansion and a loss of identity.
The result is non-binding, but PM Jan Peter Balkenende has agreed to abide by it.
'Not democratic enough'
Voting began at 0730 local time (0530 GMT) on Wednesday. Results are expected two hours after polls close at 2100.
DUTCH REFERENDUM
"Yes" camp
Christian Democrats (CDA), largest government party, plus coalition partners VVD and D66
Labour (PVDA) and Green Left opposition parties
"No" camp
Right-wing Pim Fortuyn party
Socialist Party
ChristienUnie and SGP, Christian parties
The BBC News website's Stephen Mulvey in Amsterdam says he saw large numbers of people voting early, and a steady trickle throughout the morning.
The mood has been generally calm, with little evidence of political activity outside polling stations, he says.
"I voted 'No'. I believe the current treaty is not democratic enough," Amsterdam voter Joris Kampmeijer, 28, told AFP news agency.
"I think it's a good thing if there's a strong Europe," "Yes" voter Jaena Padberg told AP at a community school in the city. "It's good that our rights will be secured."
Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende voted at his local polling station near Rotterdam.
"The future of the Netherlands is in Europe," he said on Dutch television late on Tuesday.
"I believe a 'No' vote is not in the interest of the Netherlands, not of Europe."
Discontent
Correspondents say that a second vote against the constitution could create a snowball effect throughout the bloc.
The treaty - which aims to streamline EU institutions following the admission of 10 new members - has to be approved by all 25 member states before it can take effect.
In France, the decisive rejection of the document forced President Jacques Chirac to remove his prime minister.
He replaced Jean-Pierre Raffarin with Dominique de Villepin in a bid to prove he had listened and responded to voters' discontent.
In the Netherlands, any rejection of the constitution is unlikely to have the same impact as the Dutch vote is non-binding.
Interference
But the BBC's Geraldine Coughlan in The Hague says voters are unhappy about higher prices since the euro and discontented with the centre-right government.
Many also feel threatened by what they see as a superstate that will interfere with liberal policies such as those on gay marriage and euthanasia.
Others disagree with the swift enlargement of the EU, and oppose the possible inclusion of Turkey.
However, government and major opposition parties, making up 80% of the country's MPs, support the draft constitution in the belief that it will enhance Dutch influence in Europe. |
Looks like a massive "Nee" will happen in Netherlands.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:23
|
|
I think the idea of a European superstate is never going to happen. It feels like more and more the EU will turn more into what countries like the UK or Poland want from it, i.e. a free trade zone with free movement of goods and to a certain extent people.
My main gripe with EU is the CAP. I think they should get rid of it as a show of goodwill to the world. It encourages dumping of cheap produce on the 3rd World, and it eats up too much of the budget. France won't like it but, they're now in the slow lane of a multispeed europe as well and they have lost an awful lot of power due to the NON vote. Time to take advantage and get rid of that bloated thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:23
|
|
Yup
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:23
|
|
Well it's what was the original idea behind the whole thing really. More integration would be nice, but the economies and social policies of all the member state are too radically different for it to work just by writing a fat constitution that noone has read, and fewer people understand. If you have referendums about these things make the constitution a legible document to lay people, and back it up with legislation, instead of sticking all the legislation in the constitution itself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CyberShy

|
 |
Delft, The Netherlands
Mar 1999 time: 06:23
|
|
I think it's a little surrealistic to expect the biggest nations of europe not act like the biggest nations of europe. That's democracy.
Overhere in The Netherlands Noord Holland, Zuid Holland, Noord Brabant and Utrecht are most important. Drente isn't happy with that.
But it's very very very logical that the biggest countries are most important in the EU. That's something we, inhabitants of the small Netherlands, have to learn to deal with.
Of course another option is listening to the pope, stop using condoms and the pill and breed much children.  
No, not 3 childeren or 4. Breed 10 children per familie.
Of course the men should stop listening to the pope ('stop'  ) and start to breed with every single woman overhere to make sure that even the single women will breed AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE children.
And then, when there are over 80 million dutch people stuffed in this small little country, and our dikes will stay up for a little, WE WILL RULE EUROPE AND BE ALLMIGHTY AND IMPORTANT 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|