 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jac de Molay
Curfews do have legitimate and valid uses. In neighborhoods rife with drugs and gangs, I think the cops have every right to keep minors off the street after a certain time. For their safety, and the safety of the neighborhood as a whole. |
Why then set the limit at 18 ? If it was set to say 40 or 50, maybe 60 it would have a greater impact on crime.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
It was a response to BlackCat not you. |
Actually, I agree with Combat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jac de Molay
Because they're minors, and standards of legal protection, prosecution, and enforcement are almost universally applied differently than for adults, almost always in a more conservative direction. They're kids, after all.
|
If I'm not wrong, then the age limit in many states for a driving license is 16 - meaning that they are allowed to take control of two tons of steel, glass and rubber, but they are not allowed to take a walk in their neighbourhood after 10 ? In another thread it is discussed that NY is making a proposal that also should have the right to vote, but still risk arrest if they are out after 10.
It seems that in some perspectives 16-18 years are children - in others thay isn't. And when do they really stop being children ? At least not before they become 21 and legally can drink a beer.
quote:
It's also an issue of risk management. Keeping minors off the street in specific drug/gang neighborhoods not only keeps young thugs off the streets, but protects other children. It's not like the cops are bearing down on some kid who's coming home from his shift at McDonald. They apply the policy in known high-risk neighborhoods as a precaution to protect all children.
In high-risk neighborhoods( at least here), drugs and gangs are ubiquitous- the cops can't readily ascertain who's rollin' and who isn't. So they apply a curfew for the safety and benefit of all children. |
My guess is that the curfew are making more damage than good. My recollection of that age is that the forbidden thing was much more interesting than the nonforbidden.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:35
|
|
I think I'm gonna have to agree with Donegael, the cops are just doing their job, enforcing laws that higher up have passed. You have to realise that the cops don't know any of you from a bar of concrete and thus don't know if you are a crim or not. Its not like you have a barcode on your forehead that says innocent or guilty (though give it enough time it might be reality).
So basically lighten up, its only a cop, if you have nothing to fear from your id being shown or bag searched then who cares? Much more important things to care about than that.
Though I must admit curfews are rather an interesting idea. It just seems so wrong, especially because they're state induced ones, parents yeah fine but state???
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|