 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I don't think South Korea, Taiwan, or Thailand do, but I'm willing to be wrong. Also, Thailand ain't a republic, it's a monarchy. Anyway, Taiwan and SK are democratic today, as recently as ten years ago, they weren't or were just barely. The Asian tigers prove that neither democracy nor the free market are necessary to develop a country.
In fact, in the modern era, the free market does more to harm 3rd World countries, since their economy is not developed for their own needs but for the needs of international capitalism. Any country that wants to develop should tell Oerdin, Vel, the IMF, Maggie Thatcher, etc. to shove it, and adopt the Asian method. |
while the asian tigers all had some degree of central planning, they also were open to the market, invited foreign investment, and IIUC, maintained relatively stable currencies. They are counter examples against a libertarian view of free markets - they are NOT counter examples against either IMF policies or globalization in general.
oh and they all had a strong commitment to the rule of law in the ecomic sphere, which is what I think Vel was driving at.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Without a vangaurd organization to take the revolution to its next step, it will not go anwhere. If the current government collapses, and nothing exists to replace it, the old elite will regain and retain power. |
so? even if a vanguard organization DOES take power, and DOES nationalize the energy biz, its still possible the old elites will eventually infiltrate that organization and run the nationalized energy biz. See Mexico, PRI, and Pemex.
BTW, in Venezuala, its the NATIONALIZED oil company thats been resisting Chavez, isnt it? To a great degree elite power in Latin America is INDEPENDENT of capitalism as a form of social organization (and I dont here equate capitalism with the free market, but simply private ownership of the means of production)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:34
|
|
unfortunately its quite serious, aggie. Despite what we've been told here, its not just a tiny handful of La Paz "capitalists" who oppose nationalization. The provinces where the gas is actually found, are mainly non-Indian, and mainly oppose nationalization, and want more autonomy. If the left takes power, especially if, as seems possible, the left takes power by violence, rather than through elections, those provinces can be expected to resist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: unfortunately its quite serious, aggie. Despite what we've been told here, its not just a tiny handful of La Paz "capitalists" who oppose nationalization. The provinces where the gas is actually found, are mainly non-Indian, and mainly oppose nationalization, and want more autonomy. If the left takes power, especially if, as seems possible, the left takes power by violence, rather than through elections, those provinces can be expected to resist. |
You mean that the people in the areas where the gas is found (and mainly richer people in fact) want more, even though their only connection to the gas is the fact they they live there.
I've heard this sort of argument before in Canada. It's just people trying to get more for no good reasons. It's anti-democratic nonsense.
Besides, that appraisal of the situation is false according to the Beeb:
quote: Far away from the highlands of La Paz, in the city of Santa Cruz in the country's south-east, another conflict has been brewing.
This region is home to the gas reserves and here, a powerful business elite mostly of European descent, exasperated by the continuing chaos, has been pushing for far greater regional autonomy and a bigger share of the region's gas and oil wealth.
This movement is largely opposed by the highland protesters - and, indeed, by a sizeable proportion of local indigenous people.
Leaders here have pledged to hold a referendum on increased autonomy on 12 August - with or without the approval of central government, setting the stage for further conflicts in future |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4613993.stm
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:34
|
|
The NYT:
In Bolivia's Elitist Corner, There's Talk of Cutting Loose
By JUAN FORERO
Published: August 27, 2004
SANTA CRUZ, Bolivia - This low-lying city on the edge of the Amazon has long had something of a superiority complex, which was put embarrassingly on display in June at the Miss Universe competition. Bolivia's contestant, Gabriela Oviedo, a strapping Santa Cruz native, told judges that not all her countrymen were "poor people and very short people and Indian people."
"I'm from the other side of the country, from the east, where it's not cold," she added. "It's very hot, and we're tall, and we are white and can speak English."
The comments incensed the government in La Paz, the capital 13,000 feet in the Andes, which has struggled with restive indigenous groups whose uprisings have paralyzed the country in recent years. But Cruceños, as the people of Santa Cruz are called, have been decidedly vociferous in proclaiming their cultural, ethnic and social differences with Bolivian highlanders.
So remote do the troubles of the highlands seem, and so economically burdened do the people of this region rich in natural gas feel, that they have begun talking about autonomy and, in isolated cases, outright secession.
The rift between the highlands and this city and province, also called Santa Cruz, is emblematic of a country riven by regionalism and the centuries-old resentments between Bolivia's highland Indians and its traditional ruling classes.
Santa Cruz feels like another world from the highland's frigid, windswept plains. This city of 1.4 millionpeople is dotted with shining skyscapers. Cafes line busy streets, and broad avenues feature multinational companies, from Goodyear to Petrobras to Kia Motors. The city by itself generates nearly a third of Bolivia's gross domestic product, more than half its exports and most of its tax receipts. The affluent, who speak Portuguese as well as Spanish, look less to La Paz than east to Brazil, 100 miles closer.
"There are people here who do not recognize Bolivia," said Sergio Antelo, a former mayor and leader of a group, Camba Nation, whose members are particularly strident. "They are a nation apart, like a nation without a state."
The secession movement is still on the fringe, driven largely by emotion and, some critics say, racism, since some of its proponents are quick to point out that most inhabitants here are of mixed races, not full-blooded Aymara or Quechua Indians, as are the vast majority in the rest of this nation of eight million people.
But the sentiments underscore the increasingly hard feelings of Cruceños, who feel that President Carlos Mesa has made economically ruinous decisions at their expense as he tries to walk a line between indigenous groups doggedly opposed to globalization and businessmen who favor market reforms and economic ties with Bolivia's neighbors.
Forty years ago, Santa Cruz was a hot and dusty honky-tonk of dirt streets, crumbling colonial-era structures and grizzled frontiersmen. Secluded and poor, it had 50,000 people, many working in a nascent sugar industry.
But as hard-working migrants from across the country moved here, the province's percentage of Bolivia's total population rose from 15 percent in 1976 to 25 percent today. Foreign investment in Santa Cruz has shot up in recent years, while in Bolivia generally it has fallen. Today this city is the engine of Bolivia's economic growth.
Yet many Cruceños believe the city's future is uncertain, particularly since President Mesa held a referendum in July asking Bolivians whether the country should export natural gas while raising taxes and other restrictions on private energy companies.
The measure passed, but people here saw the very fact of a referendum as indicative of what they see as the government's weak-willed leadership in the face of pressure tactics from radical Indian groups.
"Economic issues should not be debated in a referendum," said Óscar Ortiz, general manager of the Cainco industrial group. "We are now in the calm before the storm."
Lorgio Balcázar, general manager of the Pro Santa Cruz Civic Committee, which favors autonomy, added: "We are headed to the abyss. No one wants to invest. There is no certainty."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|