 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
No, Kid seems to be taking a more post-modernist approach here, saying that at some point or another, we take something at faith for the begining of our belief systems. I take it as a matter of faith that my senses reliably send data to me. I do so because I'm able to predict the results of my actions, reasonably well. In cases where I fail, it's generally due to a misinterpretation of the data or because I my reasoning was faulty. And it's reproducable.
But! I could be a brain in a jar ala The Matrix, with inputs being fed into me. I take it on faith that I actually exist in a physical world, though if it weren't. I'd still be forced to act as though it were real, and thus for all practical purposes, it would be real.
Now, as far as evolution goes, the only reasonable interpretation that fist the existing data is the Theory of Evolution. I take it as a given that this explanation is an accurate description of the rise of life and other things. The data's not complete, and new evidence could appear that completely destroys our notion of how life arose (for example, God reveals itself to us and tells us it planted false evidence-though I put this rather low on the list of probability).
Given that's the case, it means we take it on faith that our conception of how life arose and took the shapes it has, if our concept of faith is that it means believing something without complete certainty. If we describe faith as belief in the absence of evidence, which is how most of us describe it, then no, we do not take the ToE on faith, for there is overwhelming evidence that this is the way things happened.
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 16-08-2005 at 02:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:37
|
|
I'll admit that I didn't really read all of his posts, nor most of the thread. It is, after all, tl, which leads to dr.
On the other hand, what I have read, doesn't reflect well on Kid. While personally, I tend to lean on the side of there being two faiths, one in science, the other in religion, and while I personally lean more towards science (religion tends to get in the way of technological evolution and progress, whereas science does not), I'm amazed that anybody could think that there's no evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
I believe in both. Evolution is just one aspect of Deus ex machina. Many creationists see evolution as demeaning to mankind as God's special creation. My feeling is that the very idea that we're part of the awsome complexity and diversity of the entire biome, even it's apparent end point is as actually elevating. I mean, I have difficulty just making a string of paper dolls come out right, but for God to give a little proto-matter a little shove and come up with us demonstrates some mad skills at organizing..... and it's flattering too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Monkspider was a Christian Commie
hasn't posted in a while..
JM
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|