 |
|  |
 |
|
Odin
|
 |
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000 time: 23:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Smiley
Here's an idea - if high school isn't teaching anything and everyone needs a college degree, why not compress the lack of curriculum into 9 years, and have people go to college after junior high? |
I like this idea, athough I don't thing parents, especially overprotective and/or very socially conservative ones, would go along with sending thier kids off to college at age 14. But it may be the only way, because many schools, especially rural ones like my former K-12 school, wouldn't have the resources, or number of students (There were only around 80-90 people total in grades 9-12 in my rural school, as opposed to colleges who have thousands of students) to have the great variety of classes a college or tech school would have.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:37
|
|
Nah, I still approve of teacher-student interaction, and recognize the importance of kids socializing IRL in a controlled enviroment. This sort of stuff kinda lacks it all. My plan for education is to:
a) replace all books and notebooks with a touchscreen writable laptop.
b) introduce the most efficient techniques for the learning of math and science basics, and investing into more research in the area.
c)More general literature education with the emphasis of introducing the kids to more works of art. ( not just literary art, but film, painting and music, classic and contemporary)
d) Introducing general skills teaching ( oldschool shop, some outdoors, manners, and sex ed)
e) more physical education.
In an age of parents who care less and less, a parent-state for kids may be the only way to go. It's the implimentation of the emphasis on quality in the education system conveyor belt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
The problem with that theory is that this same "talent pool" of educated women is now directly competing with the entire labor force, thus squeezing them out of their own fields. So you have people coming out of other fields and into teaching, instead of lifelong teachers.
|
So your theory is that the most talented women who may have otherwise been teachers are now pushing presumably less qualified men into teaching? And this wouldn't effect teaching quality how?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|