|
BlackCat
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ted Striker
Man, you are seriously in dreamland.
How could he have complied with requests when he never had any weapons in the first place????????
Two weapons inspectors came back and said there were no weapons. The US team went in and found no weapons. Not even traces. And it wasn't like they found just a couple of weapons laying around.
THEY FOUND NOTHING
He didn't "attract" attention to those weapons, the US pushed the war and that's a fact. Period.
But the original question stands. How has invading Iraq helped the war on terrorism? |
Oh, you mean that those wmd weapons he used against kurds didn't exists and that it just was the imagination of the victims that they were hit by such kind of weapons.
Besides such boring facts, you are right - the inspectors didn't find anything, but you forget one thing. They didn't find anything where they were allowed to search. Ok, you may say, there wasn't neither anything to find where they wasn't allowed to search, but that is the real problem. If the inspectors had got acces to all they wanted, then Saddam and family could have run Iraq as their private property for at least the next 50 years.
|
28-08-2005 02:11
|
|