 |
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
The problem is that no amount of American body bags wil clean this mess, because Iraq becoming a democracy is something completely out of the hands of Americans. Empires are easy, cause you go in for your own benefit, not someone elses. Saying that you are there to help others means that in the end, unless you are lying, its not you, but the others, that decide the outcome.
The neo-con mistake was thinking that if you go around breaking heads, people will want the US to decide everything for them. They were completely wrong. |
Actually, I think their mistake was thinking that the American population had got over Vietnam, and learned from it (jury is still out, but not looking really good).
I don't think they expected that the American public would be scared off by soldiers doing what soldiers are recruited to do.
Now, as to the wisdom of removing the regime that kept US and British military resources tied down indefinitely, the wisdom of having to maintain bases in KSA indefinitely, the wisdom of ending the regime before one of the two brats could off the old man and take over to the 'delight' of the already terrorised population... the NeoCons made a mistake in the wet dreams of rabid leftists who despise the existance of the US as a world power, let alone when the US actually does something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Here's a clue. You already wrecked the place. By most standards you bought it.
Now it is on you to stick around and fix it. |
You mean, install a minority dictator and leave him armed well enough to crush his people? Cause you know, that was the condition we got it in. If the idea was to "fix", then wouldn't that be it?
That is why your annalogy is dead wrong. The US went in TO BREAK IRAQ, period. The neo-cons thought they would be able to put it back together just to thier liking.
By adovcating "stay the course", or "stay and fix it" you advocate a continuance of this notion. This notion is wrong, cause it does not work that way. That is the point.
quote: That I call gutless, just like it was 30 some years ago the last time your country broke it and then abandoned it. |
South Vietnam was never a real country. IN one way it is a perfect example for iraq. The North Vietnamese wanted a single unified Vietnam more than the South Vietnamese wanted a "south vietnam". guess who won? Yeah, the side that fought for the same aim non-stop for 3 decades.
When we invaded Iraq we destroyed the sad, brutal system that was there. That was fine, but the amdin. failed to provide a sfae blank slate for the inevitable suppressed problems of Iraq to have a "chance" of working themselves out peacefully. Even if the uS had fully secured Iraq, we still would have no guarantee of Iraq ending a democracy, only that far less people would have died up to THIS POINT.
In the end, fixing Iraq is a job only Iraqis can do. The Us at best can help. Sadkly, our help up to now has been crappy.
Personally, I don;t think the US should pull out. BUt I think "stay the course", or "you bought it, you fix it" are both horribly misguided ways of trying to convince the population to back such an expensive and difficult enterprise.
And they are obviously failing.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|