 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:15
|
|
I propose to the Civ-loving public the following:
If Firaxis does not release a statement saying the MP will be part of a FREE download, CANCEL your pre-order and refuse to buy the game!
From here, I'll just paste what I wrote in another thread:
- No matter if you play MP or don't, the fact that Firaxis kept this under their hats when they KNEW about it as far back as Kelly's 'leaked' e-mail completely ruins Firaxis' credibility on ANY announcements regarding planned patches and future versions of the game. Period.
- I am not necessarily against the decision to delay MP *if* that allows for a better SP and *if* MP is released later for free...however, #1 is so disturbing, that I really don't feel like giving Firaxis any of my money at any point. "Your loss, Yin!" Sure. Whatever.
- But rest assured that if Firaxis is capable of #1, they'll also be capable under their 'evil' publisher (whom THEY signed with) to try to make MP part of another product you have to pay for. I can only hope that if that were to happen that people would see Firaxis in a clear light.
Bottom Line: They used MP to hype up sales of the game. They then willingly kept the truth from us to protect their pre-orders. And still there is no Firaxis statement to address this issue.
Talk about the most piss-poor, stick your head in the sand, screw your public attitude. It sickens me, actually.
Last edited by yin26 on 11-10-2001 at 21:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DonJoel
|
 |
Stockholm, Sweden
Aug 2001 time: 05:15
|
|
Do Firaxis suck?
Yes, they do.
Always have?
No. They used to be cool.
Why do they suck?
They lie, they run away, they abuse peoples loyality.
(These statements only applies if Firaxis charge anything for mp, not if its a free download. But if it was, why wouldnt they say so?)
Last edited by DonJoel on 11-10-2001 at 13:44
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Provost Harrison
|
 |
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000 time: 05:15
|
|
Hang on, let us not count our chickens before they hatch. I am generally quite content to manage with SP alone, as the AI looks promising, and as long as PBEM is implemented, I will be satisfied. But I agree, it would be extremely unscrupulous to have to pay for an MP version *if* this is the case, which I doubt. However, if this was just one thing released in an expansion pack with, lets say, new civs and some new little additions, then I wouldn't have any objection particularly, but it would be nice to make it available as a download to those who don't buy such a pack (I would buy the pack anyway).
But let us hold back with the stern criticism until we figure out what is going on, because if you are wrong, you will end up with egg on your face, and generally looking very silly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozymandous
|
 |
Atlanta, GA
Aug 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
Yin:
You have the right idea on this subject. Firaxis is in the same league (IMHO) with Blizzard, whom I will never pay full price for their products again.
Simple reason in Blizzards case, Diablo2:
They release an expansion pack that causes as many problems as it adds new features, in some cases it breaks the game. They wait SIX weeks to patch the expansion and then, a month after that they sell the D2, the expansion pack and D1 for the SAME price as D2 was a year and a half earlier and only $10 more than the expansion pack was seperately.
Good company money making, sure. Piss a lot of customers off that their expansion pack broke the game and it took 6 weeks to patch it, YES. Game, plus expansion pack has been out for a year and a half after FOUR years in development and they have still issued NINE patches.
Irresponsible, you bet'cha!
I am sure many of the sheep/lemmings here (who have taken this chance to bash you and anyone who doesn't worship at the alter of Sid (get a life!)) will have no problem in being part of the problem of game companies shoddy business practices but some of us do care. As many games and companies that are on the market companies should treat their customers as more than sponges that they can squeeze money out of and release shoddy products for.
I had debated on buying Civ3 even if it didn't have MP, but now I think I'll wait because frankly, I don't like the way the game industry is heading, namely:
1) Releasing shoddy manuals and placing all the info that should have been in the manual in some kind of "strategy guide" so people spend more money.
2) Releasing games with promised features missing and then requiring people to buy an expansion pack that completes the game, fixed broken game designs, etc.
3) Releasing games that require multiple patchs to fix game balance issues, etc. Should a patch be issues to fix a problem with game/machine compatibility and crashes, if needed yes. Should a patch be issued to fix the broken items that weren't fixed in the "beta testing" and "game balancing" phase of the game, HECK NO! This is what you release DEMO's for, or HIRE people from outside to beat the game up so it's BALANCED from the time it's sent as gold. How many patches has Age of Kings had, 3, and the last was simply to disable Warez copies of the game.
It's high time people stop paying game companies for shoddy products. Some people won't care, others will, but the point to remember isn't about the money cost (although for some that is an issue) but the principle of the issue.
Would you pay someone full price for 50% or 75% of the job they promised to do and hen pay them another 25% - 50% to finish the job? If so then you are a moron and I'd like to work for you when I can get paid for more than the effort I expended.
I wonder how Firaxis will feel once the folks here go to all the other message boards across the Internet and talk about how they have acted on this issue. It's a shame because when Firaxis first started I thought they would be *THE* game company, now they are as arrogant as BLizzard whose motto is "We know what the people want better than they do".
Heh, I guess we can all eat cake, eh?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
I am more than willing to pay for multiplayer. I consider it an honor to support Sid's efforts to provide quality game entertainment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ozymandous
|
 |
Atlanta, GA
Aug 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Th0mas
'Tis not us who need the life Ozy.
Fraxis will deliver CIV III. It wont have MP in it. MP comes later. if you don't like it don't buy it - but please keep your theories to yourself. NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO BUY CIV III WITHOUT MP....just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we're lemmings or sheep. It might mean that we are actually happy with what we think Fraxis have delivered in CIV III - you obviously are not! |
What theories? The fact that MP will be released later, that's a fact. The fact that they will likely charge for MP in some weak version of an Xpack that has scenarios posted here and other people that they didn't create? Not a fact, but a very strong possibility based on past history of this game, even when Sid was involved.
Oh, regarding the lemming/sheep comment, well, what do you call folks who blindly take whatever they are given with no questions asked? Even if it has less than promised, even if it is of low quality? What do you call that? I'd call it someone who is a "follower" hence the lemming and/or sheep comment.
Loyalty is a *very* good thing, more people should display it, but BLIND loyalty is not good. If Firxais had come out 2 months ago and confirmed that there would be no MP they'd have people less upset, but they didn't.
quote: How do you know the game is shoddy? (..because it doesn't have MP? Civ is actually, principly, a single player experience)... Oh you don't that must mean your just mouthing off without knowing the facts! |
Oops, you got me. I guess I am mouthing off just like all the folks who think this game will be the next best thing since sliced bread without having played it as well, eh? 
quote: But it is not an unfinished game. If Fraxis decide that they will not include MP in the original release - for whatever reason - then it is not in the original release (can't say it more simply than that) |
It's an unfinished game if they didn't include all they said they would. I have yet to see an official announcement from Firaxis to all the people who preordered more than 3 months ago that MP will not be included. There has been an interview where it was (finally) admitted but what about those people who pre-ordered the game when MP was still advertised as a selling feature? I bet they will be surprised when they get the game...
quote: You can - I'll be playing CIV III |
Heh, and I'll be playing the Gold version og Railroad Tycoon 2, Jagged Alliance 2, Age of Kings & Conquerors, finishing Icewind Dale, finishing Baldurs Gate 2, and maybe even Stronghold. I have plenty to do, and plenty of games to play. I guess that's why my game playing experience doesn't hinge on this one game (so I can wait) as others seem to do. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|