 |
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:19
|
|
Well? This was noted over a year ago during a drug legalization debate in which one forumer remarked that a year before that the topic would've sparked a huge debate but now it was just Albert Speer against all. This was a year ago and the ever-leftist trend of former conservative apolytoners is continuing.
Imran Siddiqui, Connorkimbro, Black Dragon, Dave Floyd...
Where's the old conservatism? I'm not saying you should be Maestrobtos and Jeszenkas but why are you all libertarians now? Where's your conservative idealism? You don't care about the improvement of society?
thanks
(I wouldnt be surprised if Lincoln has turned libertarian or centrist too... and Giancarlo is an athiest? What's Apolyton coming too?)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:19
|
|
Newsmax is too extreme for my tastes... I just want to kno why the Apolyton Old Guard has turned libertarian...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
spartak
|
|
This is avery poor troll. Please desist from posting here and giving it the oxygen of publicity.
There is a point for anyone who can identify the source of the quote and the context it was made in.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:19
|
|
Imran:
And little Albie Speer still is dumb and misguided?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
Depends on what you mean by conservative.
I believe that the U.S. governmental structure is the best ever developed, a perfected Roman Empire.
I believe in Free Markets - but I also believe in the Anti-trust laws to muzzle abusers like Gates.
I believe the family unit is the best for society and should be promoted and protected.
I believe that the level of civilization can be measured by the level of equality it gives women.
I believe that "all men are created equal." (From the Declaration of Independence.) This thought leads to equal civil rights for all, no slavery, no abortion and no death penalty.
I believe in freedom of expression and its corollary, the right to obtain information.
I believe in freedom of religion from state control. I also believe that government should not be anti-religious. The U.S. government today is anti-religious in many overt and subtle ways.
When it comes to vice: gambling, prostitution, drugs and the like, I am of two minds. Mostly, I believe that the government should regulate rather than criminalize these. Governments have never been able to stamp out vice, but the attempt itself has lead to a criminal element in society that supplies vice to those who want it. The criminal element is arguably more destructive to society than the vice itself.
I believe laws, particularly tax laws, should not favor one group over another depending on status. I am particularly offended by progressive taxes.
I am strongly against Socialism. However, I do believe in the social safety-net, but not as a way of life.
I don’t know what the above adds up to. I suspect that most Americans subscribe to most of the above.
Ned
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
I am a conservative but not a Republican. There is a big difference. Conservatism means essentially to conserve that which works instead of throwing it out the window and subjecting societies to endless experimentation. If something is not broken then there is no need to fix it. Of course there is a lot of things broken now but we ought to conserve that which works and study history for some ideas on what has been tried and what has failed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:19
|
|
Fun:
quote: For the most part, I try to respect moderate conservatives who are not racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semetic, or worshipful of the upper class. |
Not racist... not sexist (I have an extremely high opinion of women)... homophobic in that I feel extreme, in your face gays ruin it for all homosexuals and note that I have defended homosexuality on apolyton... not anti-semetic... DEFINENTLY not worshipful of the damn immoral bourgeious.
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
Again, unless we all agree to what these terms mean, we are not communicating. I suspect people who call themselves liberals or conservative will have quite a few things they will agree on leaving only a few areas of disagreement. However, the areas of disagreement will vary from person to person. Typically, one of the two will be defending the status quo - a conservative stance - while the other will be advocating change - a liberal stance. Am I wrong?
For example, person A may believe in a highly progressive tax structure. Person B may not. Which is the "conservative" given that today’s' tax structures are generally progressive and person B is asking for change?
In another example, suppose that a fundamentalist believes that women should be denied the right to vote. Since most women today have the right to vote, the people who want to maintain the right to vote for women are conservatives.
As to U.S. parties, I believe the Republican Party is generally comprised of people who share a common economic philosophy that can be expressed as pro-business. Social issues are less important. In contrast, the Democratic Party is generally anti-business (read, Socialist) and believes in the importance of social issues.
Other U.S. parties, I believe, are extreme versions of either the Republican or Democratic Parties.
However, recent presidents of both parties have "moved to the center." Clinton was a strong advocate of free trade. Bush, in contrast, imposed steel tariffs. If this were the "only" issue dividing Bush and Clinton, I would vote for Clinton.
Ned
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|