Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > India threatens war
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (5): [ 1   2   3   4     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Lincoln is offline Lincoln
King
TN
Jul 2000
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 07:46 Visit Lincoln's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
India threatens war Get a bigger avatar today!

New Delhi dons warpaint for US envoy
Saurabh Shukla
(New Delhi, May 17)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Home Minister LK Advani's expression of "deep disappointment" with the US in Parliament was matched by tough language to US Ambassador Robert Blackwill behind closed doors.
In meetings on Friday with National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra and Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh, Blackwill was told the US had failed to fulfil promises to restrain Pakistan from supporting terrorism. India, therefore, would take "appropriate action". A similar message was given to US Secretary of State Colin Powell when he spoke to Singh earlier.

Blackwill's assurances that the US saw the fight against Kashmir militancy as part of the global war on terrorism received a sceptical response.

India said Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf had done nothing concrete to rein in terrorists — despite US promises to the contrary. India showed evidence that cross-border terrorism had increased after Pakistan pledged to fight terror.

Blackwill's request for more time to get Pakistan to comply was rejected.

Blackwill expressed US President George W Bush's concerns about tensions escalating into a full-scale war. India, he was told, would not take rash decisions but as a sovereign country it reserved the right to act on its security needs. India was urged not to break diplomatic relations with Pakistan.

Following these exchanges, there was a ratcheting up of diplomatic activity in the city.

Blackwill and senior US embassy officials reviewed the situation late into the night and consulted with Washington. There was speculation that besides Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, expected in South Asia in the next fortnight, Powell may also fly here.


http://www.hindustantimes.com/nonfr...02/detfro01.asp

--------------------------------------------------------------

I hope they keep their nukes under control.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 07:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

My Indian friends would tell you that getting Musharraf to restrain terror is equivalent to getting Arafat to restrain terror. Neither has any credibility. Actions do not match the rhetoric, etc.

Israel took action and ignored Bush. I fully expect India will too unless Powell can get real action out of Musharraf.

Hopefully, the EU will co-operate with the U.S. on this one.

Ned

morb is offline morb
Chieftain
San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Nov 2001
time: 21:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

both sides have been itching for a fight for a long time now. if war breaks out, I'm afraid the whole world will be drawn into it. at worst, they could use nuclear weapons on each other. at the least millions of people will be killed on either side.

OzzyKP is offline OzzyKP
King
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999
time: 00:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:27 Visit OzzyKP's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

Yea, i started working on a Civ2 scenario in which the whole world goes to war. Pakistan vs. India, Israel vs. Arabs, US vs. Iraq & Afganistan. Things are brewing and its looking bad. There will be major wars yet.

Lincoln is offline Lincoln
King
TN
Jul 2000
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:32 Visit Lincoln's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

I think that India and Pakistan are the most likely nations to use nukes first and if that happens a world war is almost inevitable.

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

I hope they make that region glow in the dark.

Pekka is offline Pekka
Chieftain
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002
time: 07:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Lincoln, i agree with you, unfortunately. I believe India and Pakistan are gonna get it on some day in the near future, no matter what. They might cool down, but they'll get it on again for sure. And about that nuke thing.. uh oh..
I hope i'm wrong. Hope the best, fear the worst.

David Floyd is offline David Floyd
King
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:46 Visit David Floyd's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
I think that India and Pakistan are the most likely nations to use nukes first and if that happens a world war is almost inevitable.


Erm, why? Would would the US jump into a India-Pakistan war, just because nukes are used? Why would Europe? Why would Russia?

Lincoln is offline Lincoln
King
TN
Jul 2000
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:50 Visit Lincoln's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Well let's just say that there would be international outrage. Who knows where that would lead. Then you have the Moslem thing involved etc.

David Floyd is offline David Floyd
King
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 08:58 Visit David Floyd's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

I doubt the US would intervene militarily, and Europe certainly wouldn't, and Russia doesn't have the capability. China sorta does, but they have no reason to either.

Outrage, sure. World War 3, no.

Lincoln is offline Lincoln
King
TN
Jul 2000
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:03 Visit Lincoln's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

I guess we will just have to wait and see. I hope someone can prevent them from blowing each other up anyway.

morb is offline morb
Chieftain
San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Nov 2001
time: 21:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd
I doubt the US would intervene militarily, and Europe certainly wouldn't, and Russia doesn't have the capability. China sorta does, but they have no reason to either.

Outrage, sure. World War 3, no.

here's how I figure it. Pakistan is the most likely to throw the nukes into the equation first. They have less of everything as compared to India. They'll want to do as much damage to India as possible before India knows what happend.

Considering the Paki gov't has a hard enough time teaming the masses in peace time, you could see how rouge or non government militias will use this to their advantage to propegate the conflict even more to advance their own causes.

The US and pretty much rest of the world (west) will likely jump in to put a lid on Pakis at the request or maybe even please for help by India. The Arabs/Muslims could get really outraged by this and see it as an opportunity to declare all out war. Things are already tense. They could set off countless terracts all over the world only making the "war on terror" more legitimate and "GO"

Everything is related in the world. If nukes are invloved, you can be sure the major powers will step in if only to make sure that they aren't the next target in all the chaos.

Andrew1999 is offline Andrew1999
Warlord

Aug 2001
time: 23:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd
I doubt the US would intervene militarily, and Europe certainly wouldn't, and Russia doesn't have the capability. China sorta does, but they have no reason to either.

Outrage, sure. World War 3, no.


There's a chance that China would team up with Pakistan against India. China and India have fought before and each still occupies territory claimed by the other. China and Pakistan have been doing a lot of military cooperation.

TCO is offline TCO
Emperor
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970
time: 00:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd


Erm, why? Would would the US jump into a India-Pakistan war, just because nukes are used? Why would Europe? Why would Russia?


Prevent global warming? move engineers in place?

Pekka is offline Pekka
Chieftain
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002
time: 07:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

I put them both on Axis of Evil then. They have wom, and are threatning using them.

The Mad Monk is offline The Mad Monk
Emperor
of Ice Cream
Mar 2000
time: 23:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd


Erm, why? Would would the US jump into a India-Pakistan war, just because nukes are used? Why would Europe? Why would Russia?


How about because some of our best forces are already in Pakistan?

I think it's quite possible that, in the event of a nuclear exchange, any carrier groups we have in the region will also be on the receiving end.

Urban Ranger is offline Urban Ranger
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic

Donate to the Red Cross
The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
May 1999
time: 13:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 09:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Saber rattling. I don't see India is in any shape to launch an attack right now.

Gatekeeper is offline Gatekeeper
King
United States of America
Feb 2000
time: 23:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 12:59 Visit Gatekeeper's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Everyone:

The first power to initiate the use of nuclear weapons will be the real loser at the end of the day, IMHO.

I wouldn't be surprised if China would come in on Pakistan's side, should things go through the roof. China could take advantage of the confusion following a Pakistani first strike and wreak havoc in northern India. Well, provided they had the military power nearby ... how many troops does China have in Tibet?

Seems like I read somewhere that Pakistan came close to hitting an Indian city with a nuclear warhead in 1999.

If that part of the world does go up in flames, I don't think it'd lead to a world war in the "traditional" sense. It might lead to a war that devastates not on the subcontinent area, but the Middle East as well. Perhaps part of the Caucusus region as well?

Gatekeeper

Eli is offline Eli
Emperor
Israel
Jul 2000
time: 07:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 14:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

quote:
Originally posted by morb

here's how I figure it. Pakistan is the most likely to throw the nukes into the equation first. They have less of everything as compared to India. They'll want to do as much damage to India as possible before India knows what happend.


If i'm not mistaken in every "mini-battle" between the two in the last year or so, India losed much more troops than Pakistan. Maybe India has more resources and manpower, but it seems that the the Pakistani soldiers are trained much better.

Or they're downplaying their casualty numbers. Typical for totalitarian Muslim states.

Mr. President is offline Mr. President
Emperor
The leaves that are green turn to brown
Jul 2001
time: 15:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 14:29 Visit Mr. President's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

You've gotta blame India for failing to conclusively win its wars with Pakistan up to now. They have two or three times the military capacity and ten times the population. They should have been able to crush Pakistan without even thinking of nuclear weapons.

Sandman is offline Sandman
Prince
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001
time: 05:19
Thumbs down  Old Post 18-05-2002 14:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I would consider a war between India and Pakistan to be a world war, since WW1 was concentrated mainly in Europe, and WW2 in Europe and the Far East.

The casualty figures of an India Pakistan war would likely dwarf both those wars put together.

Ecthy is offline Ecthy
Emperor
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000
time: 06:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 14:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

Doesn't make it a world war though

There's that nice "mad max" scenairo for Civ2, playing after 223 and all. Apparently, that one started when India and Pakistan started a nuclear war against each other, and then, big sensation, the UK joined on the side of India ... in order to help its former colony. Apart from the fact that today's Pakistan was a part of the same colony of India ( enough), the whole idea is silly, but what the heck. The world map had some nice changes

I'm afraid they'll nuke each other, and that will be it, for the military aspect. Noone but possibly China is going to join in, and the biggest problem won't be the dead down there but rather the environmental consequences.

Skanky Burns is offline Skanky Burns
Deity
Skanky Bastard Quartermaster
Aug 2001
time: 14:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 14:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Especially considering how close that region is to Australia

Case is offline Case

King
The backlash starts here
Feb 2000
time: 15:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 15:13 Visit Case<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/supporter-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Especially considering how close that region is to Australia


Check your map - Western Australia is about 3500 Km from the southern tip of India

Skanky Burns is offline Skanky Burns
Deity
Skanky Bastard Quartermaster
Aug 2001
time: 14:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 15:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Wind can move that radiation around, especially if both countries use their entire arsenal against each other.

Sandman is offline Sandman
Prince
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 16:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Doesn't make it a world war though


Well what does then?

C0ckney is offline C0ckney
Prince
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 16:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

UR is right, India doesn't have the capability to launch a (conventional) war at this stage, China could overrun the whole Manipur/Arunachal Pradesh region in a matter of weeks, Indian forces on the border are no match for them.

I think it's all sabre rattling btw

Saint Marcus is offline Saint Marcus
King
Scio Me Nihil Scire
Jan 1970
time: 06:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 17:28 Visit Saint Marcus's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#28 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Should a war start, who will the US back? India has been a long time ally, but since sept.11th Bush has gotten very cozy with Musharaf.

Evil Knevil is offline Evil Knevil
Prince
St Andrews, Scotland.
Dec 1999
time: 05:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 17:34 Visit Evil Knevil's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#29 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

Sorry I can't add anything serious.

In a Simpsons set about 30 years in the future, a load of ancient comedians are working on a project, when a decrepit Krusty comes up with this:

K: Whats the different between a pancake and Pakistan?

K: I don't know any pancakes that were nuked by India!



K: What? Too soon?

panag is offline panag
Emperor
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:19
  Old Post 18-05-2002 17:52 Visit panag's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#30 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

hi ,

anyone thought about a pact between Israel and India , .........
they allready do their missile drill's together ,.............
and , ahem , make their missile's land in the Med , a few yards from a US carrier , who did not saw them coming , ......

have a nice day

 
Pages (5): [ 1   2   3   4     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.
Apolyton Time is 00:19.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0529 seconds (92.46% PHP - 7.54% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net