 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
orange
|
 |
It doesn't matter what your name is!
Feb 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Carver
Italian-American societies are fine, Irish-American societies are fine, German-American societies are fine...but African-American? No, when it comes to African-American hyphenated terms are bad, that's when we're all supposed to just be American.
Right. |
Absolutely not.
You're trying to turn this into a racist's rant, and it is no such thing.
And besides, it's just the opposite...Black student unions are a norm, white student unions are racist and unheard of.
I don't feel there should be either, why not just a student union, or student unions based on common interests...
You can have a student union of people who enjoy rap music, and that wouldn't be racist, or a student union of people who like to debate, and that wouldn't be racist, or a student union of people who like playing computer games, and that wouldn't be racist...
...but WHY base a student union on race? It implies all black people share the same interests and all like each other, but how can that be since all people are PEOPLE.
On a somewhat related note, why is everything "African American" yet there are "Black" fraternities and "Black" Student Unions? 
Also - why would any non-black join a 'black student union'? Doesn't the name REPRESENT all that is racial segregation??
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
You know...
Next year, I think I'm going to do just that. Becuase I'll be honest - I don't KNOW what they discuss. I don't know what the purpose of the student union is. So I'm going to do just that, I'm going to find out...even though I think it contributes to segregation. |
Most likely they discuss the same things you do. Although I sure feel out of place around my sister-in-laws male relatives. They like football and I don't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
I was only saying what is a likely topic of discussion.
Other topics are likely as well. It depends on how political the group is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
What obstacles have white men overcome due to discrimination because of their race in the last 500 years??
NONE |
Not into sports are you?
White men can't jump.
White men can't sprint.
I had a coach tell me that blacks were faster because they had a longer leg muscle. At the same time that an Italian had the 200 meter sprint record and shortly after a Russian won the Olympic Gold in the 100 meters.
Well you asked.
quote:
What obstacles have heterosexuals overcome due to discrimination because of their sexual orientation??
NONE |
Nerves.
quote:
So, my question is this -- what do white men have reasons to celebrate their identity? What do heterosexuals have reasons to celebrate their identity? |
Mostly because they are feeling put upon but thats only for the non-racists. Last I saw white pride is mostly just another way to say Nazi.
Still white men really can jump and sprint but the American coaches have racist thinking clogging up their minds.
quote:
This is where I do not understand white pride or straight pride. To me, it just seems that these were started out of spiteful mockery of acknowledgement of black culture, and affirmation of gay identity. That all it seems to me --- spiteful mockery of the legitimate groups, communities, and organizations for MINORITY groups. |
People feel left out. That you should understand.
Not that I understand white pride organizations. We can always join the Masons or if you are Catholic the Knights of Columbus which my dad belonged too.
I never a saw a black Mason. Does anyone know if that has changed?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
orange
|
 |
It doesn't matter what your name is!
Feb 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
What obstacles have white men overcome due to discrimination because of their race in the last 500 years??
NONE |
Jews are white. Arabs are white. Latvians, Lithuanians, Estonians are white. Fins are white. Norweigans are white. Danes are white.
I would argue that all of these groups have gone under oppression in the past. So, it's ok to have Jewish pride, but not white pride. Well then, shall we say that it's ok to have Nigerian pride, but not black pride? How about a Malian student union, or a cameroonian sorority.
You're absolutely off your nut. You think that the only people that can be oppressed are American minorities, and that's a load of bullshit. Every race has gone through hardships, some worse than others, but that does NOT justify having some pride good and some pride bad. If Africans can be proud of their heritage, than so can I damnit. No one choses who they are or where their ancestors came from, but if you're going to set a standard for one that standard better apply on a universal scale.
quote: What obstacles have heterosexuals overcome due to discrimination because of their sexual orientation??
NONE |
You don't know that for a fact. I'm sure there are cases of a heterosexual being shunned from being friends with a homosexual by other homosexuals. Just because it's not something you hear about doesn't mean it hasn't happened. And I STILL don't see why you can be proud of something you supposedly don't have any control over anyway. And if you think for one second that Homosexuals have gone through major oppression, comprable to African Americans, you're severely mistaken.
quote: So, my question is this -- what do white men have reasons to celebrate their identity? What do heterosexuals have reasons to celebrate their identity? |
Hey pal, I'm proud of my parents and who they are, I'm proud of my grandparents and who they are, and I'm damn proud of what they've had to go through. Was it because they're white - no. But that doesn't mean i can't have pride in my heritage. Just because it's the norm doesn't make it any less worthy of pride.
I'm sure there are plenty of black families that have been well off for a good long time, generations upon generations, and they have every right to celebrate pride in their heritage if they want too. But according to you, only those that have met the mark of suffering in your eyes deserve to be proud.
quote: This is where I do not understand white pride or straight pride. To me, it just seems that these were started out of spiteful mockery of acknowledgement of black culture, and affirmation of gay identity. That all it seems to me --- spiteful mockery of the legitimate groups, communities, and organizations for MINORITY groups. |
So white pride in south Africa is ok then right? And black pride should be condemed...right?
No one's mocking anything. What I'm specifically saying is that segregating yourselves into groups which BY NAME signify that only a certain 'race' or even 'sexuality' of people should join only does THEIR race or sexuality harm, and destroys the bridges that THEIR ANCESTORS have built to connect the dots between aspects of society that were once separate.
If they want Black Student Unions, then we should not be surprised to find campuses where blacks hang out with blacks and whites hang out with whites.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
orange
|
 |
It doesn't matter what your name is!
Feb 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
Celebrations of various white cultures is legitimate -- festivals that celebrate German heritage, for instance.
An advocacy organization for whites, such as the NAAWP is not legitimate. |
but an advocacy group for blacks is legitimate because...why? Blacks have equal rights as Whites...
and what if the NAAWP or similar org. is against Affirmative Action and sees it as racist against whites? I know I do. And I don't feel I'm a racist for thinking that way.
Quite honestly I think both organizations are pointless, but I'd rather have both be legitimate than one be legitimate and one be illegitimate.
quote: By all means, white Americans should definitely be proud of their cultural heritage. |
Apparently not. It's ok to be proud that you're black, but not ok to be proud that you're white.
quote: But advocacy groups for whites?? |
Affirmative Action
quote: And I never said that suppression of homosexuals was/is on the par that blacks have suffered.
Yet to this day, homosexuals are still suppressed -- but in the face of increasing social acceptance.
One more thing -- heterosexuals already celebrate their identity in a legitimate way -- legal, and social recognition of their marriages and relationships as being legitimate. |
no, we don't "celebrate" our identity. That's part of life. It's not a celebration of our sexuality. It's something people do. I agree that any two humans that want to get married should be able to, by law...and if a group's goals were to lobby/protest/etc. for that to happen I'd be all for it, but not if they called themselves "Union of Gay/Lesbian Americans" or something to that tone.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|