 |
|  |
 |
|
Stefu
|
 |
CLOWNS WIT DA DOWNS 4 LIFE YO!
Jan 1970 time: 07:20
|
|
Let's see.
First of all, democracy's always a pretty important thing. Democracy might be flawed, but it's the best we've invented so far. And revolutions are, by themselves, undemocratic. At basis of each of them is an armed mob, or at least an armed faction, willing to use those arms to achieve their agenda. Rule by cartridge box instead of ballot box.
So, one of the biggest qualifications for revolution is that it happens in a situation where aims of the supporters of revolution could have been achieved via other means. Revolution as a last resort, in other words. Popular support of the revolution is also important. Of course, even if the government is undemocratic, revolution can lead to something worse - evil pretender trying to dethrone good king, for example - and there are other things that mark a good revolution, such as minimum bloodshed and so on - but revolution as a last resort would be the dividing line.
Thus, among good revolutions, I'd have to count such revolutions as Velvet Revolution - non-violence, except from the part of the oppressor, naturally, counts as a plus - and assorted changes of power related to fall of Soviet Empire. Non-violent, mostly led to more or less democratic governments, and didn't exactly happen to the nicest bunch of people available. French Revolution was justifiable, although it's results werent. And on the other end of scale, we have military coups, especially ones which happened in democratic nations - though whether coup is much of a revolution is a different question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Blisterz
|
|
The Spanish National Confederation of Labour
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|