 |
Should I circumcize my son?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes, of course. |
   |
20 |
25.32% |
| No, why would you? |
   |
51 |
64.56% |
| Try it on a banana first. |
   |
8 |
10.13% |
| Total: |
79 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Tom31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I don't care if people do it for religious reasons
|
Don't care if they do WHAT for religious reasons? Millions of people around the world think there's a religious basis for cutting off a girl's clitoral hood, yet all Western countries have outlawed this traditional procedure. Why should we be protecting girls' clitoral hoods but not boys' foreskins?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
I'm just here to be in awe of people about to restart a major flamewar over something so seemingly insignifigant, especially in light of the fact that tandee's decision is already made. |
Oh bah humbug. I don't think its flaming either, but if you don't like it, you're free to not participate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
This whole thing is NOT of primordial importance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tom31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
There are far more serious and obvious medical problems that arise from circumcising girls than boys. Circumcision in boys is mostly cosmetic, the biggest risk is from the potential for the procedure to be botched or infection right afterwards, it's not a very serious medical problem. Circumcision of girls is a different story, which is why it's not allowed. |
Well, female circumcision used to be a recognized medical procedure in the US, and was covered by Blue Shield insurance until 1974. A Dr. W. G. Rathmann, of Inglewood California, wrote in a US magazine in 1959 that female circumcision would improve hygiene and prevent divorce:
http://www.courtchallenge.com/temp/fgm1.gif
As for male circumcision "not being a serious medical problem," it's a helluva serious problem for boys in Africa who either die or lose their penis as a result of tribal circumcision. When done in the same unhygienic conditions, male circumcision is just as dangerous as the female variety.
http://allafrica.com/stories/200208020052.html
"Fourth circumcision initiate dies in Limpopo"
Is this what you call de minimis, Imran?
Last edited by Tom31 on 10-08-2002 at 02:13
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
Please for the love of god, don't listen to a bunch of computer dorks about this. DO IT. seriously...geez....Save the boy the anguish...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tom31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SuperSneak
Maybe Asher should start the "female vs. male" circumcision thread now...this one's had it. |
How about calling it "Should I circumcise my daughter?"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Ah, I have returned from vacation just in time to prolong your misery.
There are risks and benefits with the procedure. In the first year of life circumcision clearly decreases the risk of urinary tract infections in boys, but on the downside the risk of skin infections and permanent disfigurement ( Do you know how small the penis of a baby is? Did you know that the circumcision will be handled by an obstetric resident who has been up all night?) cancels out the benefit. Circumcision also protects against cancer of the foreskin, a condition which is frankly fairly rare in developed countries.
Circumcision may also convey partial protection against acquiring the HIV virus, but the problem is do you want to sell partial protection against a universally fatal infection? Those who believe in the protective value of the procedure may feel that other protective measures are unnecessary and thereby cancel out the protective effect.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|