 |
|  |
 |
|
Bas
|
 |
Out of step
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
Okay, first off, what exactly do you mean with:
- the centre of the geographic earth
- longest landcontact meridian
- longest land parallel
- an el
And yes, I'm familiar with the terms meridian, parallel, centre, etc. The el you mentioned, is that the Dutch el? If so, I'm quite sure the Egyptians never used that measure of length. As for point 3, I have to check...
Like Kropotkin said, they had considerable experience with building pyramids, and a good amount of slaves to do the heavy physical work for them. Sure, even then it is still a great feat of architecture, but I don't think it's anything superhuman.
And if they were so smart like you seem to believe, how come they haven't left any kind of proof except for a few pyramids, temples and a sphinx?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberShy
neither would they know how to reproduce it.
|
This is not true. The only reason we wouldnt build such a wasteful monstrosity today is because it is utterly useless. We certainly have the know-how to build pyramids, but there is no motivation to do so.
These people were great builders of their times, but they werent that smart to waste so much time and effort on a completely useless structure were they?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CyberShy

|
 |
Delft, The Netherlands
Mar 1999 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: - the centre of the geographic earth |
I *think* they mean the place with exactly as much distance to the most western landmass (Alaska) as to the eastern landmass (East-russia) as to the North (Scandinavia) as to the South (Sout America?)
Well, something like that.
I can *imagine* that that picture comes close.
That means they need to have knowledge of the geography of the entire world.
quote: - longest landcontact meridian |
I think they mean the meridian, that goes over land for the longest distance without crossing any sea. (East See, Black See, Gulf, etc.)
quote: - longest land parallel |
I don't know. I hope one of you guys knows.
quote: Like Kropotkin said, they had considerable experience with building pyramids, and a good amount of slaves to do the heavy physical work for them. Sure, even then it is still a great feat of architecture, but I don't think it's anything superhuman. |
I think there's no problem with the building, indeed with that number of slaves. It's more the architecture that's a problem. Again, I'm no architect, thus if websites claim that, I believe them.
It's not like I know the answer, it's more like I have been visiting much websites who say this. I thought I should put it up here as a topic for discussion.
quote: And if they were so smart like you seem to believe, how come they haven't left any kind of proof except for a few pyramids, temples and a sphinx? |
Stonehenge, some stonehenge thing in Israel,
there must be a city somewhere with gates build out of 500 megaton stones that are perfectly putted against each other.
But indeed, why is there nothing more than that?
But at the other site, these things are pretty good proof already. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberShy
quote: why didn't the Egyptians incorporate this magical number into their solar calendar then? |
|
Perhaps the number was dimensionless so it can't be checked either.
365.whatever WHAT? The Egyptians used cubits and that varies from place to place to place. The casing isn't there anymore so we can't measure it exactly anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberShy
quote: We certainly have the know-how to build pyramids, but there is no motivation to do so. |
I thought so, but that's not what architects and scientists say. |
Which architects and scientists say this?
quote:
quote: These people were great builders of their times, but they werent that smart to waste so much time and effort on a completely useless structure were they? |
com'on, we have:
Tour Eiffel
Statue of Liberty
Millenium Dome
Modern art |
None of these structures took anywhere near the amount of resources and labor to build as the pyramids. We have modern machines to aid us, they did not.
quote:
just to name some.
I think it's not useless. For sure if you concider that it's STILL standing! After around 5000 years!! That's amazing. They putted their footprint in the sand forever, it seems.
The architecture makes sure it won't get destroyed easily. |
Hey, I find them to be amazing structures too, but it doesnt change the fact that they are useless.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberShy
quote: - the centre of the geographic earth |
I *think* they mean the place with exactly as much distance to the most western landmass (Alaska) as to the eastern landmass (East-russia) as to the North (Scandinavia) as to the South (Sout America?) |
Then it would have to be nearer to the equator.
quote:
I think they mean the meridian, that goes over land for the longest distance without crossing any sea. (East See, Black See, Gulf, etc.) |
It passes over the Mediteranean so its wrong. If water counts then the Americas go farther north and farther south. If water stops the projection than its still wrong.
quote:
I think there's no problem with the building, indeed with that number of slaves. It's more the architecture that's a problem. Again, I'm no architect, thus if websites claim that, I believe them. |
And you believer EVERYTHING you see on the internet dodn't you?
quote:
Stonehenge, some stonehenge thing in Israel,
there must be a city somewhere with gates build out of 500 megaton stones that are perfectly putted against each other. |
Uhg. Boy that makes no sense. Stonehenge is in England. The stones aren't perfect in anyway whatsoever.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|