 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Oops, double post
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sonic
|
|
Vilnius, Lithuania
Dec 2001 time: 07:22
|
|
Frogger, so in your opinion it is better to murder an innocent person than just to hurt him?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sonic
|
|
Vilnius, Lithuania
Dec 2001 time: 07:22
|
|
A child. You just said killing him would be more justified than hurting it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Ah, but you shoukld take into account that if she was doing crack she very well could be legally culpable for the potential harm to the unborn child. I'm not sure if it's called child endangerment or child abuse.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Ok, we have settled on a new standard for convoluted logic. Its okay to abort a child but criminal to smoke and drink while carrying the same child. That begs the question, if a woman is caught smoking or drinking while pregnant can she beat the rap by doing a quick abortion?
Should we allow a child whose mother smoked or drinked while pregnant to sue its mother for damages?
Perhaps we should require a certificate of good conduct from women who want abortions. Proof that they did not smoke or drink while pregnant. If they have done such things we must not allow the abortion in order to safeguard the unborn baby's potential legal rights to recover damages from her mother.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
Last night I was out watching a couple of football games when I saw a pregnant women smoking and drinking.
Are you pro-choice for the female to do whatever she wants to her body, or do you care that the baby will be suffering and either die or be born with alcohol- and smoking-related defects?
Personally, I think she souldn't be smoking or drinking, and that is consistent with my beliefs about abortion.
However, you ought to think it's her body and can do what she wants, regardless of any ill effects to the baby, in order to be consistent. After all, it isn't a proper human is it? |
BAAAAAACK to the thread author's original topic.
As several others have already said what I agree with, the woman is behaving in ways that I have no respect for, yet we are not legally enabled to force her to stop.
If a mother is engaging in health-detrimental behavior while pregnant, she is engaging in unethical behavior, if she never intended to abort the fetus.
IMO, when a woman is pregnant due to rape, or if her delivering the baby would endanger her life, then an abortion is an ethical, legitimate option -- IMO, the woman's life and/or well-being takes precedence over a fetus.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sonic
|
|
Vilnius, Lithuania
Dec 2001 time: 07:22
|
|
No, semen aren't people, because no person can be born only from semen. However, once semen connects with women's sexual cell (don't know the name in ENglish, sorry), it becomes a person. Yes, it becomes a person exacly then, not when it is born.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
"If a mother is engaging in health-detrimental behavior while pregnant, she is engaging in unethical behavior, if she never intended to abort the fetus."
Of course if she kills the kid then it becomes "ethical". This is one reason why I am not a liberal. How do you twist this so easily? And let me guess, you do not approve of Capital punishment yet you do think that aborting a fetus is a solution to the unhealthy practices of a mother? Correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|