 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Capitalism must be regulated, otherwise it descends into chaos and violence. As for the morality of capitalism, I think that can only be measured by the collective morality of those who participate in capitalist systems. In any case, capitalism is far more moral than the alternative - legalised theft. Capitalism is not perfect, but its the best humankind can manage right now. In a few thousand years when our collective sense of morality has evolved to higher levels, things will seem a lot less capitalist. But that will only be because we will choose to co-operate with each other, not because we forced each other to.
Competition is good, but co-operation is better.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ogie Oglethorpe
|
 |
Marietta, GA
Dec 1999 time: 05:23
|
|
Monk,
We are mixing and matching. Gov's are not eco systems.
Capitalism is not necessarily a governmental system.
OTOH communism is both an economic and governmental system. And whilst capitalism may be akin to the lenders Jesus threw out of the temple, communism is very explicit in that the precepts stated that the state first. Organized religion the opiate of the masses and all that drivel. I would naturally assume that goes against "Have no other Gods before me".
Of the two Jesus threw the money lenders out. God eradicated empires for having graven images. You decide which one He was more pissed off about.
But hey I'm just human (flaws and all) what do I know in comparison to the Almighty.
Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on 19-10-2002 at 02:17
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monkspider
|
 |
banned
Aug 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
Oggie- Communism is no more inherently a governmental than capitalism. For example, the United States is Democratic and Capitalist. It could just as easily be Democratic and Communism. That is, democratic with a Communist system of distribution of wealth in place.
You have a valid point that in Communist despotisms have typically shunned religion, and in many cases the old religions were replaced with worship of the state. In fact Marx himself hasn't had too many good things to say about religion.
But the fact remains there is nothing intristically atheist about the economic system of Communism. In fact, on the contrary, a system of sharing and brotherhood is much more in sync with Christ's teachings than the system that capitalism creates, with it's greed, exploitation, violence, swallowing up the weak, and so forth. So we can support a system that mandates, unchristian teachings, such a capitalism, or one that mandates a system closely in sync with the teachings of the lord.
I know which one I will support, and I highly urge you to do the same, Oggie. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
Go to sleep for two hours and two pages of thread to come back to. Bah!
I love some of the comments, unless I'm an anthropologist, unless I'm two million years old. Ming, I take you're a creationist then? Mankind's been on this planet for 3 million years. As for the other comments, we have this really fascinating field of study known as ... archeology. Y'all should check it out some time, you learn interesting things like how people didn't always live like you do.
You see, sadly for you, Marxism isn't founded on some ideas in some old krumudgeon's head, like say, Libertarianism is. Marx and Engles actually spent decades studying economics, anthropolgy, archeology, evolution, chemistry, and so. If you look through Engles notes, The Dialectics of Nature, you will see the first exposition on Chaos theory, a theory which didn't even begin to be forumlated by the mainstream scientific community for another hundred years. Many of Marx and Engles writings are standards in sciology, anthropology, and archeology.
So when we commies talk about human nature, and how human societies have evolved, we aren't just talking out of our collective asses. We actually know what we're talking about.
You can talk all about how greed is normal under all conditions, but for the most part pre-civilized society, food was rather plentiful. Greed is meaningless in a society where if you want another apple, all you have to do is pick it. It is not until the development of agricultre that you begin to see hoarding, that's not that long ago in terms of human history, a blink of an eye.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote: Greed is meaningless in a society where if you want another apple, all you have to do is pick it. |
The lack of greed depends on a society with plentiful resources. With scarce resources, greed manifests itself in amazing numbers. |
That's one my of points!
In a society of abundence (however that is defined, as societies have evolved, our needs have grown), greed is not only pointless, it can be couter-productive.
The big problem with the greed argument is that it pretends that greed is the only or chief motivator in human existence. Are you greedy all day? In your relations with other people, are you thinking about how you can take everything? Of course, you can redfine greed into simple want, but want isn't greed any more than love means you're a stalker.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: That's one my of points!
In a society of abundence (however that is defined, as societies have evolved, our needs have grown), greed is not only pointless, it can be couter-productive. |
But your point is flawed. There ISN'T a society of abundance and there never will in our lifetimes. Therefor to talk about it assuming it will happen is silly.
quote: The big problem with the greed argument is that it pretends that greed is the only or chief motivator in human existence. Are you greedy all day? In your relations with other people, are you thinking about how you can take everything? Of course, you can redfine greed into simple want, but want isn't greed any more than love means you're a stalker. |
Actually every relation with another person involves a cost-benefit analysis, and people wish for the most greedy outcome. Greed doesn't have to apply JUST to money, but can include greed of good feeling.
quote: People are obligated to accept at least one employer's contract. |
When there are hundreds of employer's offers to accept, I don't feel that that is immoral in any way.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|