 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Timexwatch
Why not? I said his postpresidency activties not withstanding, he was, at most, impotent as a President. |
Carter was naive when he became president, and suffered for it right through the 1980 election even though he was a fast learner and set the country on a good foreign and military policy path. A lot of the groundwork for the rebuilding of the U.S. military, the resumption of U.S. activity in the Cold War, and U.S. policy in the Arabian Gulf were laid by the Carter administration, even though they were played out under his successors to a much more generally realized degree. His sucess with the Camp David accords was a masterstroke, not only generating a lot of good press for Carter and the U.S., but also strategically in reigning in hostile states like Lybia and Syria.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
how the heck was carter naive? |
Carter thought that by playing nice, the world would pay respect to the US. Well, under his admin, the US got fvcked around by every little thug out there. He eventually recognized the mistake, restarted the military buildup such as the Peacekeeper missle program. But it was too late for him to win back voters.
He should not have become the President, the post of the American President is not meant for good/nice people.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: Most misinterpreted photo of all time. The shooter was a general and the shootee was a spy. The general had to shoot the spy because he was in front of his troops and couldn't just let the spy go! That would have provided a bad example. |
I'm not sure how that justifies summary executions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: Treason by a person in your unit.
In a state of war, that justifies it to me. Cannot have a lack of discipline on the lines. There is no right to a 'fair trial' a. while you are on the front and b. in a country without that right proscribed. |
I agree with you, if by treason you mean the person trying to kill you or somehow cause your death. That's legitimate self defense under any circumstances. If by treason you mean betraying the country, I don't think that's a valid excuse for execution (summary or otherwise).
Further, if he was drafted or forced into the military (I'm actually not sure what specific instance we're talking about, I'm just talking about summary executions and treason in general), a summary execution would be invalid under any circumstances - if someone forced me into the military, I'd see no problem with shooting my way out of it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:23
|
|
I've been avoiding making this post, but I'm stuck on my paper right now, so I might as well get this done. 
quote: Also anyone who says that Washington, |
The Whiskey Tax, crushing the Whiskey Rebellion, the Fugitive Slave Act, the Bank of the US, taking Amerindian lands (particularly in Indiana and North Carolina), etc.
Giving France the go-ahead to conquer Haiti and streaching the Constitution, continuing Washington's Amerindian policies, etc..
Taking tons of Amerindian lands in the War of 1812 and starting the First Seminole War.
Ditto with the Trail of Tears, and the Second Seminole War. Also, refusing to allow South Carolina to nullify the tariff of abominations.
The draft, the suspension of habeas corpus, tons of corporate welfare to railroads and canal companies, the Homestead Act, the Morrell Tariffs, the use of federal troops in the breaking of strikes, the massacre of amerindians, and the lack of will to do anything substancial for black liberty.
Huge amounts of corruption, high protective tariffs, and lots of corporate welfare.
A protectionist, one of the most imperialistic presidents; it fought a nasty war in the Philippines (where the US had concentration camps), the take-over of the Panama Canal, helping Mexico crush a bunch of strikers, intervened in Cuba, Honduras, the Dominican Republic, and later Panama again, he criminalized dissenting opinions on the home front (anarchism), etc.
quote: Wilson,[/qutoe]
Another big imperialist; he intervened in Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Haiti, Guatemala, and Honduras (many of these multiple times or a continuous occupation), and the intervention in the Russian counter-revolution, he helped to popularize the KKK, and did nothing as their power reached dangerous heights, the Espionage Act, the Draft, and the mismanagement of Versailles, more strike-breaking with the army - this time in Colorado.
[quote]FDR, |
Lots of crazy authoritarian stuff with regards to labor relations (good thing a lot of it was struck down by SCOTUS), large increases in government authority, the Smith Act, the Draft, and large numbers of nasty things done in WW II (firebombing civilian cities, for instance).
Bay of Pigs, Laos, Vietnam... And he was a civil rights reacionary, big authoritarian, ****ed up the Cuban Missile Crisis, ranted about the missile gap when he knew it didn't exist, lots of corporate welfare, etc. I completely agree with what Sikander wrote about him.
quote: or Reagan will need strong proof to convince me that they were generally bad presidents. |
A number of bloody imperialistic interventions including Nicaragua and El Salvador, big authoritarian, crushed labor, had big increases in regressive taxes (social security taxes), lots of corporate welfare, deficit spending on crap, etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Six Thousand Year Old Man
|
 |
Ad Rock
Aug 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sikander
As my knowledge of 19th century U.S. presidents is not the best, I'll have to give a qualified vote to JFK. Drug-addicted, sex-addicted, brought the use of assassination as a tool of U.S. Foreign policy into the arsenal (and used it more than any other president), started down the road to Vietnam, slept with a known Soviet spy, brought the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. to the brink of nuclear war over a trifle, which ultimately led to the downfall of the relatively moderate Khruschev regime and the return of Stalinist leadership in the Soviet Union for another 25 years. In addition he brought the notion of a president as a television personality and even a sex symbol into being, assuring that the general decline in literacy and civic awareness and the increase in triviality brought on by television would be extended into politics with a vengeance. Also, he was lukewarm on civil rights, and corrupt. Definitely the worst president in my lifetime. |
Couldn't agree more (except for the 'in my lifetime' part )
Nuclear brinksmanship alone would earn him my vote.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
I've been avoiding making this post, but I'm stuck on my paper right now, so I might as well get this done. 
The Whiskey Tax, crushing the Whiskey Rebellion, the Fugitive Slave Act, the Bank of the US, taking Amerindian lands (particularly in Indiana and North Carolina), etc.
Giving France the go-ahead to conquer Haiti and streaching the Constitution, continuing Washington's Amerindian policies, etc..
|
Because power corrupts and Government is inherently evil, (Jefferson said this) I will agree with most of these premises......
However-
Only Person killed in the Whiskey Rebellion was a federal officer. Two rebels were charged with treason, but Washington pardoned them.
Also, the bank of the U.S. was something my personal favorite president, Thomas Jefferson, fought hard to beat. Hamilton and his Federalists got their way.
Jefferson IMO was the greatest President, and
I am not an apologist for conquering American Indian "lands". The USA made a much more efficient use of the land, and fed more people than the Indians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
As always, peole put their political beliefs in front of everything else.
Being a good or Bad leader has to do with ones accomplisments or failures of policy; not wether you agree or disagree with the policy. In that sense, lincoln,TR, FRD, Truman, Jefferson, jackson, so on are great presidents, as their policy successes greaty outnumber their policy failures.
Stalin was an evil man, but a great leader (he got what he wanted to see done done)
I dislike Reagan policies much, and I despise Bush with an incredible passion, but both were successful at getting their policies passed and incorporated into the American system: thus they were, or for now have been, successful.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saint Marcus
why are Adams and Adams up there? |
John the Alien and Sedition Acts; Quincy always flew into the teeth of political opposition.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|