 |
Should A Playoff Replace BCS?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes |
   |
24 |
61.54% |
| No |
   |
9 |
23.08% |
| Not unless there's a new Banana Bowl! |
   |
6 |
15.38% |
| Total: |
39 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Again, I don't see how the importance of the regular season is lessened under my/Ming's proposal. Any loss could knock you out of the conference championship/#12 slot. And, if you make it in with a few losses, and somehow manage to beat four consecutive fellow champs (probably with 1 loss or less), well I'd say that's a pretty compelling argument for being the best overall team in the country...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I like the coin flip idea
at the start of the season the teams are all ranked and analyzed
then some elaborate coin flipping takes place
until only one team is left, who is the winner
we can have 70 or more seasons a year even
and hte coin flipping can be televised, so no one misses the excitement
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tuberski
|
 |
ACK!!! PTHBBPPPTTT!!!!
Feb 2002 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: Then, by the same token, your undefeated team wasn't the best team either. |
How did I say that? Even with one loss, they still would have had a more deserving season than the 8-3 team did. If Nebraska beats Oklahoma in the Big 12 title game, I would still rank OU over NU. One loss teams are more deserving than three loss teams. |
Sure, usually. But a team that lost to, say, ND, Miami, and Ohio State, is still, most likely, better than a team that lost to Utah State.
ACK!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|