 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
What I can't remember is if they were planning on dropping entire conferences if their aggregate attendance wasn't up to par, even if individual schools were. IE, by-by to MAC, despite the large fan bases and relative success of Marshall, Toledo, Western Michigan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
That would make more sense... otherwise, Marshall and Colorado State would dominate the I-AA championship year in and year out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Well, drop the teams that don't have a fan base, and merge the remainders into two or three new conferences, instead of the five "lower tier" ones we have now. (Though, for the life of me, I can not conceive why the ACC is not considered "lower tier" as well.)
If this were done, would some of the "BCS Top 8 Playoffs" supporters come along to my position?
(Incidentially, I wonder if they would drop teams that are in the BCS conferences, i.e. Baylor, Duke, Wake Forest, Temple, Rutgers, Indiana...)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Speaking of Notre Dame, if they get an at-large bid ahead of Southern Cal, it will destroy what little credibility the BCS has left. Good lord, how I'd like that to happen.
Oklahoma also got beaten last night... not a big surprise, OkSt has a pretty good team. That has narrowed the field to Ohio State vs. Miami (if they beat Virginia Tech next week) or Georgia (if Miami loses, they beat Arkansas, and the numbers go their way) or Iowa (if Miami loses, and the numbers go their way) or... USC (if Miami loses, and the numbers go their way).
A shitty way to decide a championship game, but I admit, it is exciting. (Though not as exciting as a playoff...)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|