 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:24
|
|
Special mention goes to the battle of Suomussalmi, where Finn ski troops killed 27,000 Russians, losing only 900 in the process...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
How many times should I say that I'm not Serbie?
If you need one more hint, fine- my nick properly should be typed as SerB (like JhonT f.e.)
My name is Sergei. Do you follow the logic?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Fez didn't say they lost the war, Leo. He just said they lost tons of people. |
Some people here including David and Fez consider this a sign of historical shitiness of Russian military.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:24
|
|
Serb, haha good point. Stalin did explain it with self defence and pre-emptive strike of some sort. It was only 60 kilometers (?) from Finnish border to St. Petersburg and he didn't like it and saw it as a threat.
He wanted to push the border in order to make a buffer zone and feel more safe. But Finland didn't want to give any land, so the war broke.
Russians could have literally crushed Finland, but planning was bad and underestimated our forces. They were weak but not stupid. Also fooling the people into believing that they would be welcomed with warm and open hearts didn't do any good in actual combat. Soldiers thought they could walk in and have a nice chat with Finns, but obviously that was not the case. Kind of sad, because many of them believed it was so, and we wanted them to come and 'liberate' us.
They suffered much of not having really thought of winter conditions. People were freezing to death even without combat. No camoflague, so they were easy targets. They did some basic stuff very wrong, like crossing lakes with big troops. Needless to say they were already fixed and blown up and they got into freezing water with no way out. Also with poor equipment, it was easier to surround them in 'motti's', and let them starve and freez to death. Harsh, but that's the way it went.
I also remember the notorius minesweepers, soldiers, that walked hand by hand singing party songs and got blown up. Then they initiated the attack, but spirits were low because they have to run across their dead friends.
They had big army, in a tough terrain, with insufficient equipment (clothing, food) and planning.
Lack of ski troops, and everything else contributed to massive beating.
It was our fortune, that they didn't take it seriously right at hand, maybe we wouldn't be independent today (which is 6.12 btw). Also it had an impact to the whole WW2, Germans were looking close the fight, and thought they could do the same and beat the Russians easy, but that didn't happen, and they made the same mistakes as the Russians did when they came here, so they lost at Stalingrad. They had no right equipment, froze do death, had problems with logistics, underestimated the Russians.. and lost. So in a way we kind of helped the Germans to lose .
With small countries it's pretty much 'break their spirits' tactics, and it was easy since Russian officers scared their soldiers ready for us. For example they managed to freeze up their morphines and didn't know how to keep them usable. Needless to say it created bad spirits during combat. In time they of course caught up these little things and did a lot better, and it was our fortune that peace came.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sprayber
You lost me on your story but It may be kind of like how the Soviet Union declared war on Japan AFTER it was already defeated by the United States and then had the nerve to want to occupy Japan. You do remember that the US was fighting TWO major wars at the same time across two very large oceans? WWII wasn't just about the Soviet Union you know. The US didnt give a damn about Russia and would not have helped if it wasnt for the fact that they were bleeding the Germans.
|
Already defeated? Hmm...then WHY YOP'VE ASKED Stalin to attack Japan? It was one of your (American) conditions for opening of second front in Europe- after defeat of Germany SU should declare war on Japan within 90 days. Sure you have no idea about this and about Yalta's meeting. This is not that kind of thing, they teach you in American schools.
As for Japan and Germany, I like how you describe it, BUT the facts are:
1) Hitler declared war on USSR you've watch how Soviets and nazi killing each other in bloodbath humanity never saw before, untill 1944.You call your actions in Africa vs, nazi a major war? In compare with hell which was here it's childish showdowns in sandbox. Today you shout that you are super-mega warriors and laughting about silly Russkies who don't know how to fight. Great, super warriors my ass.
2) Hitler declared war on USA. Hitler, it was his choice, not yours, after he declared war vs. USA you can't say that you don't care about Germany, that didn't want to be involved, because GERMANY declared war on you.
3) Japan didn't declared war on USSR.
4) It was YOU, YOUR president who forced Stalin to declare war on Japan. (to be honest Stalin didn't mind, because he wanted to return Sakhalin)
quote: This thread is about how Russia attacked Finland BEFORE your ALLIES the Germans attacked you. |
Allies?
WTF?
Are you sure you didn't messed the sides? Finland fought on Germany side in WW2, not SU.
To your knowledge SU fought among with USA, GB, France and others (26 countries overall) against AXIS.
As for Molotov-Ribentrop. You do realize, that non-agression pact and alliance are different things, do you?
quote: The truth is, the SU thought Finland would be easy pickings and insted you had your ass handed to you. In fact, maybe its why Hitler thought he had a chance to begin with. |
Stalin thought so. Big difference. He responsible for this decision and all mistakes. He even didn't ordered to plan this war in central Red Army HQ, instead of this he send HQ general into vacation and ordered to leadership of Leningrad's military district to plan campaign. He tried to make this campaign as silence as possible, to don't provoke GB and France to declare war on SU because of Finland. This war was a good lesson for him. It showed what he done with Red army, HE and his brilliant policy of purges in Red Army. Anyhow he won this war, and gained what he wanted- 1)new territory for protection of Leningrad, which he was trying to trade peacefully before his proposals were refused. 2) GB and France didn't declared war on SU (but were very close to do so)
He didn't care how many soldiers braverly died during attacks on one of the most significient fortifications of that time, esp. under temperatures -40C and below, when tanks just didn't worked. He never cared about Russian lives much.
quote: What is it about the Russians that they can't keep allies? They are almost as bad as the Italians about switching sides. |
Nice joke. It comes from an American a citizen whose country is world's heavy weight champion of hypocrisy and switching sides.
Last edited by Serb on 01-12-2002 at 18:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
ps. we will take Karelia back! |
Come and get it.
You gave good lesson to Russians in 1939. We've returned the favor in 1944.
You want round 3?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|