 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Stefu
Stalin wanted to conquer Finland and make it a part of Soviet Union, either de facto or de jure. SU's true goals should have been made abundantly clear by upgrade of "Karelo-Finnish" SSR to a republic status in 1940, clearly in preparation for the Finnish part of the equation to join Karelia, and by Soviet Union's attempt at constructing a puppet regime in form of Otto Wille Kuusinen's Terijoki government. Then there was that marching guide, detailing the pleasant little stroll Russians were supposed to have to Helsinki...
Leningrad protection was a smokescreen at most. If Finland had capitulated on Soviet demands then and there, our fate would have been the same as of the Baltic republics. |
Fine, fine, answer one question then- if so, then why he ordered his forces to stop when they finnaly BROKEN the Manerheim line and the road for comlete occupation was clear? Why he agree to took only territories he wanted to trade before the war?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Fez
Really? They did have many skirmishes... during the war... |
Oh really... Tell us more. It's a new word in historical science.
1938 and 1939 gave good lessons to Japanese. After those two scirmishes they signed non-agression pact and turned in direction of USA as new (MUCH easier as the thought) victim for their attack. Since 1939 Japanese never attacked Soviets, because Zhukov kicked their asses so hard in 1939, that they didn't want to expirience it again, even when Hitler was several kilomiters away from Moscow and many thought that Soviets are history, even then they didn't dare to attack SU.
quote: Well at least the Americans know how to fight a war... because the Russians... hah! They suck. They march off millions of poorly armed men into machine gun fire... it was only when the Germans were overrunned with Russian troops was when they pulled out of Stalingrad. The Russians were probably the most incompetent fighting force at the time. |
You &*&^@#$%@ ***** (*^*&%%#$ ***** (*^(*&% Spanish *@#(*^*^&**** *****ng, **#$**$%*$*, *#$)*&$*, *@&$***$@* and %)@#&%#$*@#$*. Typical: 1) %$#*#^#$%*
2) **$%^*(*#$ 3)
3) Fu@*$# Franco **%$#%$ admier.
4)EDIT: allright I was a bit drunk yesterday and a bit over-agressive. I withdraw this statement as silly and unnecessary.
5) and *%*#&
6) it is you who suck.
This incompetent force destroyed- overall 80% of German manpower and 75 % of tanks, planes, artilery and any other military vihecals. The Wermmach- conquerors of Europe, the guys who crushed France (I guess much more competent military in your eyes) within 40 days.
You just a #*@**$* *!**.(self-censored)
quote: And to even show more incompetence look at Afghanistan. The Russian fought there for ten years using C-grade troops and terrible reserves, and they were finally defeated by a rag-tag militias. And then suddenly, the US goes in there and pushes the taliban out. That is a clear answer for who is more competent. |
1) We weren't defeated
2) When we left because of our internal problems we left pro-Russian government.
3) To owerthrow this government Americans used Taliban, not to mention they spend millions $$$ to ObL PERSONALY, when he fought vs. Soviets.
4) They weren't rag-tag militias, but guys trained by American instructors and supplied by American weapons.
5) We controled this MUCH larger then Vietnam country for ten years and lost less then 14 500 soldiers.
6) Americans lost about 60 000 in Vietnam, and when they withdrawn from there a Communist government was established.
7) Americans didn't conquered Afghanistan. Northern Alliance did it.
8) Without Russian who gave its contacts with Northern Alliance leaders it would be much difficult for USA to did, what they done.
Sure it's news for you, but while Afghanistan was under embargo (initiated by USA iirc, not sure about this) WE supplied Northern Alliance- our former enemies. Because in modern conditions we had common enemy- the Taliban. We started to supply it 2 years before Sept 11. Northern Alliance done the job, Americans just bombed the Taliban- THEY FORMER ALLIES IN WAR VS SOVIETS. Their favorite tactic- to bomb enemy from safe distance and let somebody else to risk their necks (N.A.) and after proxy army lost a lot of people in fight for victory, claim that its American victory. Very honest I bet after 30 years no one will remember about Northern Alliance and how many those people lost, only anout American super-mega-warriors.
*throw-up*
Have a nice ****ing day
I'm out of here.
Last edited by Serb on 02-12-2002 at 14:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sprayber
Feb. 20, 1938 - Hitler announces support for Japan
August 1938 - Korean border skirmish between Japan and Soviet troops
Aug. 20 - Zhukov defeats Japan at Nomonhan on Mongolian border
Aug. 23 - Nazi-Soviet Pact
1939
Sep. 17 - Russia invades Poland, Baltics, (Finland on Nov. 30)
Sep. 29 - German-Russian treaty partitions Poland
1941
June 22. Operation BARBAROSSA begins.
Dec 7 US attacked by Japan
Dec 11 Germany declares War on US
1945
Aug. 6 - Hiroshima - 20 kiloton Little Boy killed 80,000
Aug. 8 - Russia declared war on Japan
Aug. 9 - Nagasaki - 22 kiloton Fat Man kills 70,000
Aug. 15 - Emperor surrender broadcast - VJ Day
Japanese Occupation
Stalin kept 376,000 Japan soldiers of Kwantung army, put in Siberian gulags
Stalin refused to return 4 islands in the Kuriles that he called the Northern Territories, seized from Japan in the closing days of the war - no peace treaty signed between USSR and Japan
Fact it Serb. The Soviet Union collaborated with the Nazis until they turned on the SU and invaded. You go around calling everyone Nazis when your own country signed treaties with them. And about the Japanese, how brave of the Soviet Union to declare war on an enemy that had just been bombed with an atomic weapon. |
Excuse me, are you nuts?
Do you think army could be teleported from Europe to Far East within TWO DAYS?
We ahd an agreement with USA, after the war vs. Germany will be over, SU should declare war vs. Japan within 90 days. All this time since end of war in Europe Soviets re-located their forces to Far-East, considring how much was done, how many people and machines were re-located in less then 90 I'm really surprised. You think Soviets could defeat 900 000 Quantun army using forces of Far East district?
You are damn ignorant people Americans, first you sign agreement and demand, D E M A N D help, then when we fullfill terms of agreement you call as cowards. Nice.
quote: Fact it Serb. The Soviet Union collaborated with
the Nazis until they turned on the SU and invaded. |
Every majore power in Europe collaborated with
the nazis, at the same scale then. Read about foreign policy of GB and France in 30s more, then we'll talk. Stalin was the winner of this diplomatic match, but far not the single player.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lefty Scaevola
|
 |
San Antonio TX USA
Oct 2000 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sultan Bhargash
In my opinion the Suomi are the purest kindest wisest folk in the world. |
Purest I rather doubt. After centuries of being alternately the a** b***h for Sweden and Russia/USSR. I suspect they are as ruthless, Machiavellian, and clever in international politics as any. And more power to them for that. They sure as hell needed those characteristics in that neck of the woods.
Last edited by Lefty Scaevola on 02-12-2002 at 02:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rasbelin

|
 |
Tampere (Tammerfors), Finland
Nov 1999 time: 07:24
|
|
Anyway, what's the clue with this thread? 
Bash the USSR for attacking Finland? Well, let's say that the real reason for capturing Finland can be explained in many ways.
First of all Stalin wanted to gain control in the region of the Baltic Sea as it was agreed in the secret Ribbentropp-Molotov treaty. The Germans would take most of Poland, while the Russians would take Estonia, Latvia and Lithunia, plus Finland as agreed in the secret additional paragraph. The other reason for taking Finland was that it would allow access through Lappland and by that you could capture the Swedish Lappland with it's iron reserves. Well, they didn't succeed so Germany got the chance to get iron from the Swedes by trade.
Regarding the Russian troops I have to stress that they were indeed well armed and trained, but the Finns were more comfort with the winter conditions and the Russian tactics of taking over Finland in 2 weeks as Stalin claimed was too unrealistic. Of course this has to do with that the Red Army had lost good officers as Stalin has excuted or sent to Siberia many of them, because of very various reasons, so that hampered the Red Army in general. Overall the Russians should also have tried to keep up a better morale and reinforced more heavily.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|