 |
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Whatever.
I agree that they are being rediculous for wanting an apology from Bush for an accident that he had nothing, personally, to do with. However, what I think the really want is apology from the US that the accident occured.
We could say sorry, "Sorry we ran over those girls, it is a big tragedy, and we will regret the incident for the rest of our lives. And, since you are so concernded of US involvement in your country, we will kindly step back from the board and welcom the North Koreans as they walk into your country killing all who will resist. Do you think they will apologize?... Hey, that reminds me, someone needs to apologize to all the families that were killed in the war here. Especially since some died due to "friendly fire". Hey, N. Korea, please apologize for all the killings you did too... Please."
Yet, that is why I am not a polotician.
As a US citizen I am apauld by both the accident and the subsiquent responses from it. I, as a US citizen, will apologize without haste and the upmost of sincerity, and I would like to see Bush (the US representative) do the same. All this because someone has to be the bigger man, turn the other cheek, and be the keeper of peace.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
El León
|
 |
Wisconsin
Sep 2002 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
Whatever.
I agree that they are being rediculous for wanting an apology from Bush for an accident that he had nothing, personally, to do with. |
Um, maybe I am confused, but the apology is asked from Bush not as a person, but as the representative of the country which stationed the troops that ran over the girls.
quote: We could say sorry, "Sorry we ran over those girls, it is a big tragedy, and we will regret the incident for the rest of our lives. And, since you are so concernded of US involvement in your country, we will kindly step back from the board... |
I do not see how these are related in any way. The military can be in Korea and not run over school girls, and apologize when they do so, without that meaning that they shoud not be there. Also, the US cannot change history or make north Korea apologize, but it can set the example.
And DetroitDave brings up something very important - people in the US have no clue as to what Koreans mean when they ask for an apology. It IS a very strong admission of wrongdoing, but also, as DD points out, the kind of act of nobility expected from someone who is a leader.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
Why is humility demanded of the US? We're there for a reason. If they don't agree with that reason, why not just argue against it on that basis?
"If a coule of dilomats drivng around ran over two small girls in the US, and then the two diplomats were sent home and cleared of any negligence there would be plenty of angry people in the US demanding some sort of appology from the government."
We would focus on the negligence. A Georgian diplomat was in this situation a couple of years ago. We asked if we could try him in US court, because his BAC was 3x the legal limit.
IOW, the negligence was real. In this situation, I don't even know if there was any negligence.
Last edited by DanS on 10-12-2002 at 00:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Why is humility demanded of the US? We're there for a reason. If they don't agree with that reason, why not just argue against it on that basis?
We would focus on the negligence. A Georgian diplomat was in this exact situation a couple of years ago. We asked if we could try him in US court, because his BAC was 3x the legal limit.
IOW, the negligence was real. In this situation, I don't even know if there was any negligence. |
This is not an Asian issue. KOreans, just like Okinawans, have to deal with whatever the aggrevations and dangers of having major military based near your home, and they aren't even your own nation's bases, but someone else's, which means you have very little political say about whether they stay in your neighborhood or not anyway. If in any other part of the world major military bases existed so damn close to a foreign military base, you would see this issue come up often aftre ever singe such incident. And that way the s handles incident is much like the police handles incident in the US :clumsily, with not attention to public sentiments or publicity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:24
|
|
" utsde of town" and right inside downtown Megalopolis are two different things. I lived in a city damn close to significant US bases (Panama City Panama) and you did not see that sigificant a US precense, or hear that may overflights even though some of the bigest air-bases in the world at the time were in the Canal Zone. So there is a significan difference.
S.Korea's army is far more powerful than the N.Korean army. We have 37,000 toopr there,. They have an army of 600,000 men, far better equiped and tranied than the 1,000,000 N.Korean army. They have a far greater economy, including making their own equipment, and a signifanclty bigger populartion. And S.Koreans expect N.Korean nukes to be headed for Tokyo, which produces no tears from them. So, No, S, Korea does not need US help to beat N.Korea in a conventional war.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:24
|
|
Further, GePap, South Korea possesses far more significant reserves than does North Korea. If you include all reserves, the figure is something like 4 million for South Korea vs. under 2 million for North Korea.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:24
|
|
I think this has more to do with Confucian concepts of shame and group responsibility that anything else. East Asian societies are much more concerned with hierarchy than American society and tend to see things in terms of groups, not individuals.
In this case, the truck drivers commited a terrible act and are being blamed for it. In America, we would place the blame solely on the truck drivers and leave it at that. East Asians, however, tend to place the blame on the entire group responsible. To them, the truck drivers not only brought shame upon themselves; they brought shame upon their entire group, the U.S. military in this case. Bush, as Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. military, is ultimately responsible for all actions committed by his subordinates, regardless of how far down the chain of command they are. Bush is supposed to feel shamed by the actions of the truck drivers and should want to apologize for their actions.
Of course, this type of thinking is completely foreign to Americans, so the Korean demands seem unreasonable. In their proper cultural context, however, they aren't really so strange.
These concepts also have an effect on the Japanese-Korean tensions mentioned earlier. In the West, such tensions would die off with the men responsible. In Asia, however, the shame for such actions is applied to the group responsible, in this case the Japanese people, and is transmitted from generation to generation.
Even when all of the men responsible for Japanese atrocities are dead, the Koreans and Chinese will still consider the Japanese people responsible for those actions. The Japanese, on the other hand, will not apologize because they do not want to admit that their ancestors were wrong and thereby shame them after death. In the end, it all creates a tinderbox of pent-up tension that could blow up at any minute.
Hope that explains your question. It was a pretty brief explanation, but I don't have the time to go into the intricacies of the concept of shame in Confucian culture. Needless to say, it is a complicated subject. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:24
|
|
It certainly is difficult to understand why the Koreans are upset. Two young girls get run over and killed by an American military vehicle. The driver and commander don't even get a slap on the wrist. Instead the two culprits get transferred out of Korea (where have we heard this before).
Yup, it's just them strange Asians and their wacky culture.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|