 |
|  |
 |
|
Beta

|
 |
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
Response received from Lux. Looks like we have a glitch. They have ceremonial burial. I suspect they are trading on their continent.
They also mention that we should be able to see on the trade screen what they have available. Can Eli or Diss please check the save and let us know.
And a somewhat more sinister and depressing thought. Maybe they are in touch via PM with GS. Perhaps they know about the current trade tensions between us. Maybe that is affecting their stance. I somehow doubt it - I suspect it is with another civ on their continent. This is early proof that if we get out of the tech trading loop, we may be left behind in a hurry.
Perhaps another reason to say yes to the trade for the wheel. Does Lux have it. Please check the screen. Thanks. Here's their message.
RE: Hello!!!
Unfortunately, we at this time are chasing the same skills. Being a scientifc and industrious civ ourselves, we are looking toward creating a better metal alloy you call, iron. We suspect with such discovery, we can create a formidable army to which we can defend our nation and trade such secret.
You must inquire your controller which techs you posess that we possibly cannot have(or whoever has access to save file). It has been our long tradition of honoring our ancestors and burying them in proper burial grounds. This form of tradition has led us to wonder who our first ancestors were. We concluded that we are all children of light, there for We worship the light, and its giver the sun. Many local villages are gathering in masses to worhip this wonderful deity. I suggest if you do not have a religion, join us~
You must discuss within your own team which techs are available to our disposal that we do not have. Once again, this can be seen on the trade screen. I am quite uncertain of which technology you guys have/don't have, but I assure you, we are very advanced. We have many to offer, so there will always be plenty of reward to do business with Lux Invicta. With natural border securing both of our empire and reducing hostilities, we look foward to pure trades and helping each other's interests.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
more reason to trade with GS
than we can trade with Lux more and be very advanced also
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Beta

|
 |
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
I have posted the proposed letter back to GS on the trade poll thread. Realized I should probably have posted it here. Sorry - can't even follow my own rules.
Nathan Barclay of Gathering Storm,
Greetings my dear sir. My humble apologies for not getting back to you sooner. I acknowledge the pressures that have been placed on you and your leaders by our deliberations.
After considerable discussion - and I think you fully understand and appreciate the magnitude of these early decisions - I am pleased to inform you that I have been directed by the Controller to advise Gathering Storm that the two-tiered technology trade, as previously outlined, is acceptable to Vox Controli.
To this end, we would, at the earliest possible moment, trade bronze working for the wheel. At a prescribed future date, we will trade iron working for alphabet. We acknowldge the need for the two-tiered trade to create equity in the overall beeker costs of the trades involved.
We do have one concern. In the first instance, we are trading a 'military' technology for another military technology, which in our opinion, is of lesser significance, to us, Vox Controli, of Persian lineage. In the second instance we are trading an even more powerful military technology for a peaceful technology. This way of looking at the two-tiered trade was the major stumbling block to its early approval here at home. We, of Vox Controli, are all certain of our own peaceful intentions. However, some of our senators are not so sure of yours. And this trade was seen by some as a major step in strengthening your military position.
We therefore ask that this deal be taken in conjunction with the earlier proposals on peaceful co-existance on the continent, as outlined in my previous letter. One is dependent on the other.
We would also appreciate a "statement of peaceful intent" from Gathering Storm, given that we have stated our such intent several times now.
We also see the need to get past this early stumbling block our relationship has encountered. If we can work towards mutual trust and co-dependence, I feel that together, we will be better prepared to face the rset of the world. Gathering Storm had raised this point in an earlier correspondence. The position has merits, and I can see us both working towards such a goal.
In conclusion, we do trust that we can do business as described above. I look forward to hearing from you, not only in regards to the technology trade, but with respect to the territorial matters discussed earlier. I offer my sincerest regards to you and the leaders of Gathering Storm.
Yours truly,
BetaHound
Voice of Foreign Affairs
Vox Controli
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
see my response in the other thread
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
that is why it would be nice to have the wheel
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Beta

|
 |
Prowling in a PBEM near you!
Nov 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
Response from GS - also went to jon, eli, and diss - this is going to be interesting ...
Greetings BetaHound and Vox Controli,
I regret to inform you that I have contracted a disease known as "real life," and that my physicians will not permit me to put the time into this message and its related issues that I would really like to. I hope you can understand my situation.
I fear that if you want us to reach a consensus to commit to a permanent peace within the time available for this trade deal, you want the impossible. Your earlier actions have stirred up more than a little mistrust, resentment, and even anger among some of our leaders (indeed, probably among all of us to varying degrees), and those wounds will require a combination of time and positive experiences between our peoples before they can fully heal.
That said, however, we of Gathering Storm can guarantee you of two things. First, it is our great hope to avoid even the hint of warfare for a long time to come. We have far too much to do settling cities and building infrastructure to want to waste our resources fighting.
And second, our interest in obtaining Iron Working so early is purely defensive in nature. Were it not for defensive concerns, especially concerns about the power of your immortals, our focus would be entirely on peaceful lines of research. But you do have immortals (or at least the basic technology needed to build them), and in light of the recent tensions, we regard the ability to build swordsmen as an important counterweight.
(If you would feel more comfortable with some specific duration attached to our promise of peace, that could be arranged as long as the duration is reasonable and there are reasonable protections for each side's legitimate interests. But durations imply endings, and I much prefer to view this as merely a beginning.)
We should also point out that contrary to what some among you seem to think, your rejection of our proposal would make little difference in when we learn how to work iron. It is ultimately the peaceful technology, not the military one, that you would cause a major delay to if you reject this proposal. And in the process, you would pass over both a valuable economic opportunity and an opportunity to replace the recent tensions with a clear positive element in our relationship.
In regard to your request that we withdraw our warriors, we would like to propose a different idea. We have long valued the assurances Grog can provide that no Vox Controli army (aside from your two scouts) is anywhere near our territory. If you have any similar concerns regarding us, I imagine you would appreciate similar assurances from the eyes of your own units. We therefore propose that Grog remain where he is for the time being, and that you move Willy "9" and Tim "6-3" (using the Language of the Keys) from their positions as of when we took our turn. Slash can fall back to a less potentially threatening position. That would give each of us early warning should the other attempt a betrayal. (In the words of certain wise men, "Trust, but verify.") We further assure you that this arrangement puts Tim at least as close to our capital as Grog will be to yours, so the warning times on each side will be comparable. The lookouts on both sides would, of course, fall back as the two nations expand.
I know that this does not give you all of the assurances that you might have wanted, but I hope you can recognize that the the tensions caused by your recent actions will require some time to heal. We honestly feel that this trade proposal is in the interest of both our nations, and we hope you can recognize that mutual interest also.
We need to know whether these assurances are sufficient for you to accept our proposal, and we need to know quickly. Otherwise, the opportunity will be lost. (Please send Sir Ralph a copy of your response as well.)
Sincerely,
The People of Gathering Storm
Nathan Barclay, Chief Economist
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|