 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
tanelorn
|
 |
of the deep blue sea
Jun 2001 time: 07:16
|
|
I agree with Case on the simultaneous order thing, however I actually believe that the super etendard/ exocet weapon system has proven its efectiveness in battle. Moreover, we should not forget that US navy crusaders had a better dogfight ratio than contemporary Phantoms in Vietnam,if only because of their guns and better maneuverability.
On the other hand, the Phantoms were used as bombers as well, which meant that most of their losses were due to ground fire over the north (AAA & SAMs) and accidents, when flying low (radars couldn't follow the terrain back then).
Crusaders weren't made to go through that.
Speaking of NAM, a few USAF F104C's fought there.
Here is my second try on the Starfighter, NATO's mainstay fighter/bomber for a quarter of a century
(used by almost all Nato countries as well as Pakistan, Jordan, Taiwan, Japan, Spain before Nato admission etc.)
My previous starfighter looked too fat.
Time to go on a diet.
Attachment: tanelorn f104.gif
This has been downloaded 274 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Catfish
|
|
Wollongong, Australia
Aug 2000 time: 14:16
|
|
Well, this is how a couple of mine came out after loading the Civ2 palette + constrast + brightness:
Hmm, so-so
Edit: Just remembered - I used Fairline's original, so it's got the German insignia.
Attachment: leopards.gif
This has been downloaded 243 time(s).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|