 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sandman
That's a strawman argument. The destruction of Israel does not necessarily entail a single death. |
It does so long as there is one single Israeli willing to defend it with his life. And I think there are a lot more than one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
are they benefitting from the US without giving much of anything back to us? they are as close to an arab friend as we have and that counts for something...more than having the freak of the nations as a friend.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
On Egypt:
quote: Originally posted by MRT144
are they benefitting from the US without giving much of anything back to us? |
About the only thing they give back to us is not attacking Israel or us outright (which they wouldn't do anyway cause they don't have the power to).
They still have lots of anti-american propoganda, and hate the US.
Heck, they've even threatened to close the suez canal to any military ships (though I don't know if they've since backed down).
Just how are we benefiting from our relationship with them? Even our relationships with the Jordanians and the Kuwaitis have given us more in return than our relationship with Egypt. Jordan has been much more moderate and helpful, and Kuwait has oil and agreed to take part in any military operation. Just what have the Egyptians given us?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
if israel had gone under this wouldnt be an issue...
i dont know ned. i think its the arabs right to attack israel if they wish and its israels right to defend themselves. its possible you are right ned. i hope you are right. i just hope we havent dug a hole for ourselves that we wont be able to get out of for generations to come.
for egypt, dont they control the suez?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MRT144
if israel had gone under this wouldnt be an issue...
|
Because the Arabs would turn over and love us if Israel were gone? 
With Israel gone, they'd still be in the same horrible situation they have now, with dictatorial governments who, in order to maintain power, divert the attention of their people by attacking other countries and the west, both verbally and physically.
Back at the end of Israel's war of independence, Nasser, who later became the leader of Egypt and led to the 1967 war, and Rabin met each other in a ceasefire negotiation. Nasser told Rabin something along the lines of "we shouldn't be fighting between us, we should be fighting against the imperialist powers" (refering to France and Britain). Arabs don't hate the west because we help Israel. They hate Israel because they see it as the closest instance of the west.
And it's hardly as if all conflicts in the world in muslims are associated with have anything to do with Israel. The Iraq-Iran war? The India-Pakistan tension? Russia v. Chechyens? The Gulf War? etc., etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
they wouldnt love us...but they wouldnt be alienated by us.
and please, you really believe that there would be attacks on western targets if there wasnt a "western power" in the middle east? they would just randomly lash out against say parisians and san franciscans alike?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MRT144
and please, you really believe that there would be attacks on western targets if there wasnt a "western power" in the middle east? they would just randomly lash out against say parisians and san franciscans alike? |
Given that Al Qaedas reason for attacking us is our troops in Saudi Arabia (there to protect it from Iraq), and not Israel, I'd say, yes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
are our troops really there to protect them from iraq? can you find a source for that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MRT144
are our troops really there to protect them from iraq? can you find a source for that? |
Well, that and keeping the leadership in power, and not being overthrown by an even more radical element (like Bin Laden)
Take a look here
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
i dont think it would be better, but i think that you cant ignore the fact that what we are doing is giving justification to many people to condone terrorism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MRT144
i dont think it would be better, but i think that you cant ignore the fact that what we are doing is giving justification to many people to condone terrorism. |
Yes, and not doing so would give Bin Laden a far more powerful base of operations than Afghanistan was - which would mean more attacks. Or in the case of Iraq, more power over the region.
Geopolitics is complicated and sometimes there aren't any good solutions, just the best of a bad lot of solutions.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|