 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Actually, about 10% of the victims of rape are men. Mostly by other men, but that is not what Doc was discussing with some others.
So maybe those 10% don't matter. |
I never said that it was utterly impossible for a woman to rape a man, but it is rare and much more difficult to carry out than for a man to rape a woman.
Men being raped by men does matter, but I was responding first to Che's rumbling about the possiblity of being raped while asleep, then to Urban Ranger's and Alinestra Covelia's postings about women rapeing men.
IIRC about half of the victims of childhood sexual abuse are male.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Gibsie
So... if you're "making out" (a really stupid term btw) with a girl, and she says no, you have to stop. Okay, but what if she then takes her clothes off and initiates sex- is that rape? What if the guy says "You said no, so I can't do this. No." at some point as well, but it keeps going... does it mean that each person raped the other? |
If you're making out with a girl and you indicate the desire for intercourse, to which she replies "no", but she continues with the making out then you need to ask yourself whether you are comfortable with the situation. If you are OK with continuing things indefinitely at the level she desires then go ahead. If you are going nuts with the desire to consumate the evening then you ought to back away from the situation.
I'm sure that at some point in your life you've encountered a girl who was very interested in you, but whom you wouldn't have been caught dead with. Would it be alright for this girl to have been allowed to "have her way" with you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SirTweek
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I'm sure that at some point in your life you've encountered a girl who was very interested in you, but whom you wouldn't have been caught dead with. Would it be alright for this girl to have been allowed to "have her way" with you? |
If I met a girl that was very intrested in me but that I wouldn't be caught dead with I sure as hell wouldn't lead her on. I definitely wouldn't tease her sexually. Neither would I continue to 'make out' with her all the while saying no. That would just be cruel. Yet millions of women do it everyday all across this great country.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SirTweek
If I met a girl that was very intrested in me but that I wouldn't be caught dead with I sure as hell wouldn't lead her on. I definitely wouldn't tease her sexually. Neither would I continue to 'make out' with her all the while saying no. That would just be cruel. Yet millions of women do it everyday all across this great country. |
I was merely trying to illustrate the concept that both parties have the right to determine the nature of their involvement with the other.
Why are girls more finicky about intercourse? Maybe it has something to do with who is lilkely to get "stuck" woth the consequences of the act.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SirTweek
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I was merely trying to illustrate the concept that both parties have the right to determine the nature of their involvement with the other.
Why are girls more finicky about intercourse? Maybe it has something to do with who is lilkely to get "stuck" woth the consequences of the act. |
Hmmm...stuck with the consequences like how I've become a walking wallet to a women that has been unemployed since the child was born or would that be like how I only can get 2 hour visits once a week to see my firstborn child. Or would those be the consequences she gets like eighteen years of welfare, child support, yearly tax breaks, and a 'baby bonus' cheque every month. Can't forget the power to manipulate me at every oppurtunity with my own daughter. Yeah she has it hard in life.
Personally I think they are more finicky because men let them get away with it, rather then walking away and telling them to get lost when they tease.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Maybe North Americans are more rational than Europeans, but I can insure you that here, "no" can be a tool in the seduction process, and "no" can be said when the girl is more than willing to accept (according to several female friends).
I don't think it is any patronizing to say women use words in a different ways than men. Some women, at the contrary, are quite proud of it. |
You missed my point entirely. I was trying to say that regardless of the syllable uttered, women are capable of letting men know what they want. The idea of some women that "say no when they mean yes" does occurr as part of "coy " behaviour anywhere in the world I imagine. But any non-idiot should err on the side of caution if there is any doubt. Respect her wishes if you are in doubt as to what she wants.
I have never been any doubt as to a woman's expressed intention and if you never use force or are so idiotic to think that "rough is how she likes it" ( unless she has let you know this explicitly) you would be in a consensual situation until you are told otherwise
So bottom line for me is that I take NO aseriously but all "no's" are not created equally. Consider that you are caressing a woman in a special way and she murmurs " no no no no " all while removing your shirt and trousers. Later without any force whatsoever and the woman being a full participant in every way, intercourse occurs. Words have a context and anyone who would call this situation a "rape" is a moron.
I'm a married guy and I know that words like " Not tonight", "I'm tired" or even "Lets go to the grocery store" mean NO in the proper context
Last edited by Flubber on 09-02-2003 at 22:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Imran Siddiqui: What you are saying is terribly black and white. As if men should run away in terror every time a woman says 'no'. A vast majority of men don't stop immediately when women say no, yet they still aren't rapists. And a many women don't want men to stop even if they said no. Your "no means no" is an utopy which is not and cannot be true, because people don't want it to be so. |
It is not utopia, it is THE LAW! Go right ahead and continue to attempt to initiate sex after the woman says no, but then don't be suprised if she charges you with sexual assault.
Like che said, it ain't hard. When she says no, you stop, or else you are proceeding without consent and that makes you a criminal if she presses charges.
If you want to play Russian Roulette, go right ahead. Don't act shocked if it doesn't turn out the way you want it to.
quote: The truth of the matter is if a woman says no then you can go to jail if you continue. So don't play the game, don't risk your own butt. As soon as she says no, get the hell out of there. Go out and find a woman that doesn't play the game. Find one that isn't going to tease you then leave you cold or pretend she doesn't want to do it so you have to work harder to get it (or buy a nice shiny rock for her to give it to you). Don't fall prey to sexual and emotional manipulation. |
Bingo. No means no, because if you continue, and she REALLY meant no, then you can be guilty of sexual assualt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:25
|
|
Frogger
I thought the same thing-- It was blackice or a name like that IIRC
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Actually, about 10% of the victims of rape are men. Mostly by other men, but that is not what Doc was discussing with some others.
So maybe those 10% don't matter. |
So does 90% not make "most?" How did your post invalidate mine?
Last edited by Urban Ranger on 10-02-2003 at 07:58
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
It is not utopia, it is THE LAW! Go right ahead and continue to attempt to initiate sex after the woman says no, but then don't be suprised if she charges you with sexual assault. |
Well imran I think the point that many of us were trying to make is that the mere fact that the syllable " no" is uttered at some point does not necessarily make sex afterwards a "rape". Absent force, threat of force or severe inebriation, a subsequent verbal affirmative or positive actions would override the "no". A woman can change her mind.
As for playing with fire, anytime you sleep with a stranger there are so many dangers thay are almost uncountable. One is the false allegation of rape (even if the word "no " was never uttered). These situations are pretty rare but if you have no idea as to the mental state of your bed partner, watch out.
If a person is not mature enough or just don't feel comfortable about discussing sexual boundaries (don't want to break the mood) there are playful ways to do things. Assuming you are at a stage where you are comfortable giving her a massage , you could play the up/down/right left game. You tell her that she is the boss and as your hands move you teasingly seek direction. It can be a very fun and playful way for her to allow or not allow as much or as little contact as she wants. Since you obey her "directions", she feels more and more comfortable.
Bottom line . . . ascertain what your partners limits are and respect them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|